INTRODUCTION: More than one-third of U.S. adults are obese, which greatly increases their risks for type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and some types of cancer. Busy healthcare professionals need effective tools and strategies to facilitate healthy eating and increase physical activity, thus promoting weight loss in their patients. Communication technologies such as the Internet and mobile devices offer potentially powerful methodologies to deliver behavioral weight loss interventions, and researchers have studied a variety of technology-assisted approaches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The literature from 2002 to 2012 was systematically reviewed by examining clinical trials of technology-assisted interventions for weight loss or weight maintenance among overweight and obese adults. RESULTS: In total, 2,011 citations from electronic databases were identified; 39 articles were eligible for inclusion. Findings suggest that the use of technology-assisted behavioral interventions, particularly those that incorporate text messaging or e-mail, may be effective for producing weight loss among overweight and obese adults. CONCLUSIONS: Only a small percentage of the 39 studies reviewed used mobile platforms such as Android(®) (Google, Mountain View, CA) phones or the iPhone(®) (Apple, Cupertino, CA), only two studies incorporated cost analysis, none was able to identify which features were most responsible for changes in outcomes, and few reported long-term outcomes. All of these areas are important foci for future research.
INTRODUCTION: More than one-third of U.S. adults are obese, which greatly increases their risks for type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and some types of cancer. Busy healthcare professionals need effective tools and strategies to facilitate healthy eating and increase physical activity, thus promoting weight loss in their patients. Communication technologies such as the Internet and mobile devices offer potentially powerful methodologies to deliver behavioral weight loss interventions, and researchers have studied a variety of technology-assisted approaches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The literature from 2002 to 2012 was systematically reviewed by examining clinical trials of technology-assisted interventions for weight loss or weight maintenance among overweight and obese adults. RESULTS: In total, 2,011 citations from electronic databases were identified; 39 articles were eligible for inclusion. Findings suggest that the use of technology-assisted behavioral interventions, particularly those that incorporate text messaging or e-mail, may be effective for producing weight loss among overweight and obese adults. CONCLUSIONS: Only a small percentage of the 39 studies reviewed used mobile platforms such as Android(®) (Google, Mountain View, CA) phones or the iPhone(®) (Apple, Cupertino, CA), only two studies incorporated cost analysis, none was able to identify which features were most responsible for changes in outcomes, and few reported long-term outcomes. All of these areas are important foci for future research.
Entities:
Keywords:
randomized trial; technology; weight loss
Authors: Ellen C Cussler; Pedro J Teixeira; Scott B Going; Linda B Houtkooper; Lauve L Metcalfe; Robert M Blew; Jennifer R Ricketts; J'Fleur Lohman; Vanessa A Stanford; Timothy G Lohman Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2008-02-28 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Lawrence J Appel; Catherine M Champagne; David W Harsha; Lawton S Cooper; Eva Obarzanek; Patricia J Elmer; Victor J Stevens; William M Vollmer; Pao-Hwa Lin; Laura P Svetkey; Sarah W Stedman; Deborah R Young Journal: JAMA Date: 2003 Apr 23-30 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Jennifer L Kraschnewski; Heather L Stuckey; Liza S Rovniak; Erik B Lehman; Madhu Reddy; Jennifer M Poger; Donna K Kephart; Elliot J Coups; Christopher N Sciamanna Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Bonnie Spring; Jennifer M Duncan; E Amy Janke; Andrea T Kozak; H Gene McFadden; Andrew DeMott; Alex Pictor; Leonard H Epstein; Juned Siddique; Christine A Pellegrini; Joanna Buscemi; Donald Hedeker Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2013-01-28 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Clare E Collins; Philip J Morgan; Penelope Jones; Kate Fletcher; Julia Martin; Elroy J Aguiar; Ashlee Lucas; Melinda J Neve; Robin Callister Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2012-04-25 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Marieke F van Wier; Geertje A M Ariëns; J Caroline Dekkers; Ingrid J M Hendriksen; Tjabe Smid; Willem van Mechelen Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2009-01-09 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Francisco I Salgado García; Karen J Derefinko; Zoran Bursac; Robert C Klesges; Jon O Ebbert; Catherine R Womack; Rebecca A Krukowski Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2018-11-13 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Natalie Gold; Amy Yau; Benjamin Rigby; Chris Dyke; Elizabeth Alice Remfry; Tim Chadborn Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2021-05-14 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Christine Delisle; Sven Sandin; Elisabet Forsum; Hanna Henriksson; Ylva Trolle-Lagerros; Christel Larsson; Ralph Maddison; Francisco B Ortega; Jonatan R Ruiz; Kristin Silfvernagel; Toomas Timpka; Marie Löf Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2015-02-07 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Kristen M J Azar; Suneil Koliwad; Tak Poon; Lan Xiao; Nan Lv; Robert Griggs; Jun Ma Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2016-05-27 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Bonnie Spring; Christine A Pellegrini; Angela Pfammatter; Jennifer M Duncan; Alex Pictor; H Gene McFadden; Juned Siddique; Donald Hedeker Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2017-05-11 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Sarianne Wiklund Axelsson; Åsa Wikberg-Nilsson; Anita Melander Wikman Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2016-12-16 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Gladys Block; Kristen Mj Azar; Robert J Romanelli; Torin J Block; Donald Hopkins; Heather A Carpenter; Marina S Dolginsky; Mark L Hudes; Latha P Palaniappan; Clifford H Block Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2015-10-23 Impact factor: 7.076