Literature DB >> 21299702

Equity of colorectal cancer screening: cross-sectional analysis of National Bowel Cancer Screening Program data for South Australia.

Paul R Ward1, Sara Javanparast, Michelle Ah Matt, Angelita Martini, George Tsourtos, Stephen Cole, Tiffany Gill, Paul Aylward, Genevieve Baratiny, Moyez Jiwa, Gary Misan, Carlene Wilson, Graeme Young.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The National Bowel Cancer Screening Program (NBCSP) is a population-based screening program based on a mailed screening invitation and immunochemical faecal occult blood test. Initial published evidence from the NBCSP concurs with international evidence on similar colorectal cancer screening programs about the unequal participation by different population sub-groups. The aim of the paper is to present an analysis of the equity of the NBCSP for South Australia, using the concept of horizontal equity, in order to identify geographical areas and population groups which may benefit from targeted approaches to increase participation rates in colorectal cancer screening.
METHOD: De-identified data from the NBCSP (February 2007 to July 2008) were provided by Medicare Australia. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were undertaken in order to identify the predictors of participation rates in the NBCSP.
RESULTS: The overall participation rate was 46.1%, although this was statistically significantly different (p<0.001) by gender (42.6% for males and 49.5% for females), socioeconomic status (40% in most deprived quintile through to 48.1% in most affluent quintile) and remoteness (45.6% for metropolitan, 46% for remote and 48.6% for rural areas). These findings were confirmed in multivariate analyses. Of the NBCSP participants, 0.24% (CI 95% 0.20-0.30) identified themselves as Indigenous and 8% (CI 95% 7.7-8.3) reported speaking a language other than English at home.
CONCLUSION: Findings from this study suggest inequities in participation in the NBCSP on the basis of gender, geographical location, Indigenous status and language spoken at home.
© 2011 The Authors. ANZJPH © 2010 Public Health Association of Australia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21299702     DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2010.00637.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health        ISSN: 1326-0200            Impact factor:   2.939


  12 in total

1.  Birthplace is not a determinant of colorectal adenomas.

Authors:  Fiona Tran; Jenn Hian Koo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Institutional (mis)trust in colorectal cancer screening: a qualitative study with Greek, Iranian, Anglo-Australian and Indigenous groups.

Authors:  Paul R Ward; Cushla Coffey; Sara Javanparast; Carlene Wilson; Samantha B Meyer
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  The distribution of lung cancer across sectors of society in the United Kingdom: a study using national primary care data.

Authors:  Barbara Iyen-Omofoman; Richard B Hubbard; Chris J P Smith; Emily Sparks; Emma Bradley; Alison Bourke; Laila J Tata
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Socio-demographic and other patient characteristics associated with time between colonoscopy and surgery, and choice of treatment centre for colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  David Goldsbury; Mark Fort Harris; Shane Pascoe; Ian Olver; Michael Barton; Allan Spigelman; Dianne O'Connell
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Cancer Screening among immigrants living in urban and regional Australia: results from the 45 and up study.

Authors:  Marianne F Weber; May Chiew; Eleonora Feletto; Clare Kahn; Freddy Sitas; Lucy Webster
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Behavioural and demographic predictors of adherence to three consecutive faecal occult blood test screening opportunities: a population study.

Authors:  Amy Duncan; Deborah Turnbull; Carlene Wilson; Joanne M Osborne; Stephen R Cole; Ingrid Flight; Graeme P Young
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 7.  A systematic review of geographical differences in management and outcomes for colorectal cancer in Australia.

Authors:  Michael J Ireland; Sonja March; Fiona Crawford-Williams; Mandy Cassimatis; Joanne F Aitken; Melissa K Hyde; Suzanne K Chambers; Jiandong Sun; Jeff Dunn
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Individual- and provider-level factors associated with colorectal cancer screening in accordance with guideline recommendation: a community-level perspective across varying levels of risk.

Authors:  Ryan J Courtney; Christine L Paul; Robert W Sanson-Fisher; Finlay A Macrae; Mariko L Carey; John Attia; Mark McEvoy
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Sociodemographic and health-related predictors of self-reported mammogram, faecal occult blood test and prostate specific antigen test use in a large Australian study.

Authors:  Marianne F Weber; Michelle Cunich; David P Smith; Glenn Salkeld; Freddy Sitas; Dianne O'Connell
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Inequities in access to healthcare: analysis of national survey data across six Asia-Pacific countries.

Authors:  Samantha B Meyer; Tini C N Luong; Loreen Mamerow; Paul R Ward
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.