Literature DB >> 6575614

A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part I.

R A Holdaway.   

Abstract

This article presents a soft-tissue analysis which demonstrates the inadequacy of using a hard-tissue analysis alone for treatment planning. The material and methods used to develop this technique came from years of observation and description of patients from the private practice of the author. The findings indicate that, in general, for adolescents the normal or usual thickness of the soft tissue at point A is 14 to 16 mm. As point A is altered by tooth movement, headgear, etc., the soft tissue will follow this point and remain the same thickness. When there is taper in the maxillary lip immediately anterior to the incisor, as in protrusive dentures, the tissue will thicken as the incisors are moved lingually until the tissue approaches the thickness at point A (within 1 mm. of the thickness at point A). When the lip taper has been eliminated, further lingual movement of the incisor will now cause the lip to follow the incisors in a one-to-one ratio. These concepts are predictable in adolescents when the lip thickness at point A is within the normal range. Some exceptions are as follows: Even if there is lip taper, if the tissue thickness at point A is very thin (for example, 9 to 10 mm.), the lip may follow the incisor immediately and still retain the taper. If the tissue at point A is very thick (for example, 18 to 20 mm.), the lip may not follow incisor movement at all. Adult tissue reaction is similar to the first exception. Even though there may be lip taper, the lips will usually follow the teeth immediately. Cases are presented to demonstrate these concepts and to illustrate a normal or acceptable range of variation for facial harmony related to variations in skeletal convexity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6575614     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(83)90144-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod        ISSN: 0002-9416


  74 in total

Review 1.  Facial reconstruction--anatomical art or artistic anatomy?

Authors:  Caroline Wilkinson
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  3D soft tissue analysis--part 2: vertical parameters.

Authors:  Janka Kochel; Philipp Meyer-Marcotty; Michael Kochel; Susanne Schneck; Angelika Stellzig-Eisenhauer
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  [Comparative study of the accuracy of localizing cephalometric reference points in using digital and conventional imaging technique].

Authors:  T Ruppenthal; G Doll; H G Sergl; B Fricke
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1991-10

4.  Comparison of lateral photographic and radiographic sagittal analysis in relation to Angle's classification.

Authors:  Atalia Wasserstein; Nir Shpack; Yossi Ben Yoseph; Silvia Geron; Moshe Davidovitch; Alexander Vardimon
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  Effects of malocclusions on facial attractiveness and their correlations with the divine proportion.

Authors:  Seden Akan; Ayse Gul Torgut; Hüsamettin Oktay
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 1.938

6.  Soft tissue esthetic norms for mahabubnagar population of southern India.

Authors:  Jay Sinojiya; Kaladhar Reddy Aileni; Madhukar Reddy Rachala; Jaipal Reddy Pyata; Vankre Mallikarjun; C Manjunatha Reddy
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-01-12

7.  [The diagnostic set-up. 1. Dentoalveolar discrepancies].

Authors:  A D Vardimon
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1986-04

8.  [New Holdaway analysis in anatomically correct occlusion].

Authors:  R Schugg
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1985-08

9.  Long-term stability of soft tissue changes in anterior open bite adults treated with zygomatic miniplate-anchored maxillary posterior intrusion.

Authors:  Eiman S Marzouk; Hassan E Kassem
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Photometric Evaluation of Soft Tissue Changes in CLP Patients: Le Fort I Advancement Osteotomy (ALO) Versus Anterior Maxillary Distraction (AMD).

Authors:  Joby Paulose; Eldho Markose
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2013-08-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.