Literature DB >> 21299319

The nature of gestures' beneficial role in spatial problem solving.

Mingyuan Chu1, Sotaro Kita.   

Abstract

Co-thought gestures are hand movements produced in silent, noncommunicative, problem-solving situations. In the study, we investigated whether and how such gestures enhance performance in spatial visualization tasks such as a mental rotation task and a paper folding task. We found that participants gestured more often when they had difficulties solving mental rotation problems (Experiment 1). The gesture-encouraged group solved more mental rotation problems correctly than did the gesture-allowed and gesture-prohibited groups (Experiment 2). Gestures produced by the gesture-encouraged group enhanced performance in the very trials in which they were produced (Experiments 2 & 3). Furthermore, gesture frequency decreased as the participants in the gesture-encouraged group solved more problems (Experiments 2 & 3). In addition, the advantage of the gesture-encouraged group persisted into subsequent spatial visualization problems in which gesturing was prohibited: another mental rotation block (Experiment 2) and a newly introduced paper folding task (Experiment 3). The results indicate that when people have difficulty in solving spatial visualization problems, they spontaneously produce gestures to help them, and gestures can indeed improve performance. As they solve more problems, the spatial computation supported by gestures becomes internalized, and the gesture frequency decreases. The benefit of gestures persists even in subsequent spatial visualization problems in which gesture is prohibited. Moreover, the beneficial effect of gesturing can be generalized to a different spatial visualization task when two tasks require similar spatial transformation processes. We concluded that gestures enhance performance on spatial visualization tasks by improving the internal computation of spatial transformations. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21299319     DOI: 10.1037/a0021790

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  41 in total

1.  Gesturing has a larger impact on problem-solving than action, even when action is accompanied by words.

Authors:  Caroline Trofatter; Carly Kontra; Sian Beilock; Susan Goldin-Meadow
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.331

Review 2.  Gesture as simulated action: Revisiting the framework.

Authors:  Autumn B Hostetter; Martha W Alibali
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-06

3.  Ability and sex differences in spatial thinking: What does the mental rotation test really measure?

Authors:  Mary Hegarty
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-06

4.  Gesturing during mental problem solving reduces eye movements, especially for individuals with lower visual working memory capacity.

Authors:  Wim T J L Pouw; Myrto-Foteini Mavilidi; Tamara van Gog; Fred Paas
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2016-03-19

5.  Individual differences in mental rotation: what does gesture tell us?

Authors:  Tilbe Göksun; Susan Goldin-Meadow; Nora Newcombe; Thomas Shipley
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2013-02-20

6.  The effects of learning American Sign Language on co-speech gesture().

Authors:  Shannon Casey; Karen Emmorey; Heather Larrabee
Journal:  Biling (Camb Engl)       Date:  2012-10

7.  Doing gesture promotes learning a mental transformation task better than seeing gesture.

Authors:  Susan Goldin-Meadow; Susan C Levine; Elena Zinchenko; Terina KuangYi Yip; Naureen Hemani; Laiah Factor
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2012-09-12

8.  Gesture for Linguists: A Handy Primer.

Authors:  Natasha Abner; Kensy Cooperrider; Susan Goldin-Meadow
Journal:  Lang Linguist Compass       Date:  2015-11-01

9.  Better together: Simultaneous presentation of speech and gesture in math instruction supports generalization and retention.

Authors:  Eliza L Congdon; Miriam A Novack; Neon Brooks; Naureen Hemani-Lopez; Lucy O'Keefe; Susan Goldin-Meadow
Journal:  Learn Instr       Date:  2017-04-07

10.  Constraining movement alters the recruitment of motor processes in mental rotation.

Authors:  David Moreau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.