Literature DB >> 21296940

Effect of spatial differences in microbial activity, pH, and substrate levels on methanogenesis initiation in refuse.

Bryan F Staley1, Francis L de Los Reyes, Morton A Barlaz.   

Abstract

The initiation of methanogenesis in refuse occurs under high volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentration and low pH (5.5 to 6.25), which generally are reported to inhibit methanogenic Archaea. One hypothesized mechanism for the initiation of methanogenesis in refuse decomposition is the presence of pH-neutral niches within the refuse that act as methanogenesis initiation centers. To provide experimental support for this mechanism, laboratory-scale landfill reactors were operated and destructively sampled when methanogenesis initiation was observed. The active bacterial and archaeal populations were evaluated using RNA clone libraries, RNA terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP), and reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). Measurements from 81 core samples from vertical and horizontal sections of each reactor showed large spatial differences in refuse pH, moisture content, and VFA concentrations. No pH-neutral niches were observed prior to methanogenesis. RNA clone library results showed that active bacterial populations belonged mostly to Clostridiales, and that methanogenic Archaea activity at low pH was attributable to Methanosarcina barkeri. After methanogenesis began, pH-neutral conditions developed in high-moisture-content areas containing substantial populations of M. barkeri. These areas expanded with increasing methane production, forming a reaction front that advanced to low-pH areas. Despite low-pH conditions in >50% of the samples within the reactors, the leachate pH was neutral, indicating that it is not an accurate indicator of landfill microbial conditions. In the absence of pH-neutral niches, this study suggests that methanogens tolerant to low pH, such as M. barkeri, are required to overcome the low-pH, high-VFA conditions present during the anaerobic acid phase of refuse decomposition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21296940      PMCID: PMC3067427          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02349-10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  16 in total

1.  Anaerobic degradation of solid material: importance of initiation centers for methanogenesis, mixing intensity, and 2D distributed model.

Authors:  V A Vavilin; I Angelidaki
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2005-01-05       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Spatial stratification of soil bacterial populations in aggregates of diverse soils.

Authors:  Daniel Mummey; William Holben; Johan Six; Peter Stahl
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2006-04-06       Impact factor: 4.552

3.  Intracellular pH of acid-tolerant ruminal bacteria.

Authors:  J B Russell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Effect of an acidic and readily-biodegradable non-hazardous industrial process waste on refuse decomposition.

Authors:  Ahmad Sadri; Bryan F Staley; Morton A Barlaz; Fang Xu; Gary R Hater
Journal:  Waste Manag       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 7.145

5.  Bacterial population development and chemical characteristics of refuse decomposition in a simulated sanitary landfill.

Authors:  M A Barlaz; D M Schaefer; R K Ham
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Vertical distribution of methanogens in the anoxic sediment of Rotsee (Switzerland).

Authors:  K Zepp Falz; C Holliger; R Grosskopf; W Liesack; A N Nozhevnikova; B Müller; B Wehrli; D Hahn
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  The importance of hydrogen in landfill fermentations.

Authors:  M R Mormile; K R Gurijala; J A Robinson; M J McInerney; J M Suflita
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Modification of spatial distribution of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid degrader microhabitats during growth in soil columns.

Authors:  C Pallud; A Dechesne; J P Gaudet; D Debouzie; G L Grundmann
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Nitrogen management in bioreactor landfills.

Authors:  G Alexander Price; Morton A Barlaz; Gary R Hater
Journal:  Waste Manag       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 7.145

10.  Use of phylogenetically based hybridization probes for studies of ruminal microbial ecology.

Authors:  D A Stahl; B Flesher; H R Mansfield; L Montgomery
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Current challenges of high-solid anaerobic digestion and possible measures for its effective applications: a review.

Authors:  Julius G Akinbomi; Regina J Patinvoh; Mohammad J Taherzadeh
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels Bioprod       Date:  2022-05-18

2.  Screening of anaerobic activities in sediments of an acidic environment: Tinto River.

Authors:  Irene Sánchez-Andrea; Patricia Rojas-Ojeda; Ricardo Amils; José Luis Sanz
Journal:  Extremophiles       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Direct interspecies electron transfer between Geobacter metallireducens and Methanosarcina barkeri.

Authors:  Amelia-Elena Rotaru; Pravin Malla Shrestha; Fanghua Liu; Beatrice Markovaite; Shanshan Chen; Kelly P Nevin; Derek R Lovley
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Improved Anaerobic Fermentation of Wheat Straw by Alkaline Pre-Treatment and Addition of Alkali-Tolerant Microorganisms.

Authors:  Heike Sträuber; Franziska Bühligen; Sabine Kleinsteuber; Marcell Nikolausz; Katharina Porsch
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2015-04-15

5.  Chemically Stressed Bacterial Communities in Anaerobic Digesters Exhibit Resilience and Ecological Flexibility.

Authors:  Benjamin Schwan; Christian Abendroth; Adriel Latorre-Pérez; Manuel Porcar; Cristina Vilanova; Christina Dornack
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  A Methanogenic Consortium Was Active and Exhibited Long-Term Survival in an Extremely Acidified Thermophilic Bioreactor.

Authors:  Wenhao Han; Pinjing He; Yucheng Lin; Liming Shao; Fan Lü
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  A pyrosequencing-based metagenomic study of methane-producing microbial community in solid-state biogas reactor.

Authors:  An Li; Ya'nan Chu; Xumin Wang; Lufeng Ren; Jun Yu; Xiaoling Liu; Jianbin Yan; Lei Zhang; Shuangxiu Wu; Shizhong Li
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 6.040

Review 8.  Microbial ecology of anaerobic digesters: the key players of anaerobiosis.

Authors:  Fayyaz Ali Shah; Qaisar Mahmood; Mohammad Maroof Shah; Arshid Pervez; Saeed Ahmad Asad
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-02-19

9.  Total solids content: a key parameter of metabolic pathways in dry anaerobic digestion.

Authors:  Jean-Charles Motte; Eric Trably; Renaud Escudié; Jérôme Hamelin; Jean-Philippe Steyer; Nicolas Bernet; Jean-Philippe Delgenes; Claire Dumas
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 6.040

10.  Community diversity metrics, interactions, and metabolic functions of bacteria associated with municipal solid waste landfills at different maturation stages.

Authors:  Lerato Sekhohola-Dlamini; Ramganesh Selvarajan; Henry Joseph Odour Ogola; Memory Tekere
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2020-12-12       Impact factor: 3.904

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.