Literature DB >> 15540194

Anaerobic degradation of solid material: importance of initiation centers for methanogenesis, mixing intensity, and 2D distributed model.

V A Vavilin1, I Angelidaki.   

Abstract

Batch anaerobic codigestion of municipal household solid waste (MHSW) and digested manure in mesophilic conditions was carried out. The different waste-to-biomass ratios and intensity of mixing were studied theoretically and experimentally. The experiments showed that when organic loading was high, intensive mixing resulted in acidification and failure of the process, while low mixing intensity was crucial for successful digestion. However, when loading was low, mixing intensity had no significant effect on the process. We hypothesized that mixing was preventing establishment of methanogenic zones in the reactor space. The methanogenic zones are important to withstand inhibition due to development of acids formed during acidogenesis. The 2D distributed models of symmetrical cylinder reactor are presented based on the hypothesis of the necessity of a minimum size of methanogenic zones that can propagate and establish a good methanogenic environment. The model showed that at high organic loading rate spatial separation of the initial methanogenic centers from active acidogenic areas is the key factor for efficient conversion of solids to methane. The initial level of methanogenic biomass in the initiation centers is a critical factor for the survival of these centers. At low mixing, most of the initiation methanogenic centers survive and expand over the reactor volume. However, at vigorous mixing the initial methanogenic centers are reduced in size, averaged over the reactor volume, and finally dissipate. Using fluorescence in situ hybridization, large irregular cocci of microorganisms were observed in the case with minimal mixing, while in the case with high stirring mainly dead cells were found. (c) 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15540194     DOI: 10.1002/bit.20323

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng        ISSN: 0006-3592            Impact factor:   4.530


  7 in total

1.  Effect of spatial differences in microbial activity, pH, and substrate levels on methanogenesis initiation in refuse.

Authors:  Bryan F Staley; Francis L de Los Reyes; Morton A Barlaz
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Microbial ecology in anaerobic digestion at agitated and non-agitated conditions.

Authors:  Zhuoli Tian; Léa Cabrol; Gonzalo Ruiz-Filippi; Pratap Pullammanappallil
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Biomass waste-to-energy valorisation technologies: a review case for banana processing in Uganda.

Authors:  Robert Gumisiriza; Joseph Funa Hawumba; Mackay Okure; Oliver Hensel
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 6.040

Review 4.  Food Waste to Energy: An Overview of Sustainable Approaches for Food Waste Management and Nutrient Recycling.

Authors:  Kunwar Paritosh; Sandeep K Kushwaha; Monika Yadav; Nidhi Pareek; Aakash Chawade; Vivekanand Vivekanand
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Membrane biofilm development improves COD removal in anaerobic membrane bioreactor wastewater treatment.

Authors:  Adam L Smith; Steven J Skerlos; Lutgarde Raskin
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 5.813

6.  Effects of lipid concentration on thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and grease waste in a siphon-driven self-agitated anaerobic reactor.

Authors:  Yong Hu; Takuro Kobayashi; Guangyin Zhen; Chen Shi; Kai-Qin Xu
Journal:  Biotechnol Rep (Amst)       Date:  2018-06-26

7.  Identification of metabolite and protein explanatory variables governing microbiome establishment and re-establishment within a cellulose-degrading anaerobic bioreactor.

Authors:  Stephen J Callister; Lee Ann McCue; Amy A Boaro; Brian LaMarche; Richard A White; Joseph M Brown; Birgitte K Ahring
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.