Literature DB >> 21296136

Age differences in the purr call distinguished by units in the adult guinea pig primary auditory cortex.

J M S Grimsley1, A R Palmer, M N Wallace.   

Abstract

Many communication calls contain information about the physical characteristics of the calling animal. During maturation of the guinea pig purr call the pitch becomes lower as the fundamental frequency progressively decreases from 476 to 261 Hz on average. Neurons in the primary auditory cortex (AI) often respond strongly to the purr and we postulated that some of them are capable of distinguishing between purr calls of different pitch. Consequently four pitch-shifted versions of a single call were used as stimuli. Many units in AI (79/182) responded to the purr call either with an onset response or with multiple bursts of firing that were time-locked to the phrases of the call. All had a characteristic frequency ≤5 kHz. Both types of unit altered their firing rate in response to pitch-shifted versions of the call. Of the responsive units, 41% (32/79) had a firing rate locked to the stimulus envelope that was at least 50% higher for one version of the call than any other. Some (14/32) had a preference that could be predicted from their frequency response area while others (18/32) were not predictable. We conclude that about 18% of stimulus-driven cells at the low-frequency end of AI are very sensitive to age-related changes in the purr call.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21296136      PMCID: PMC4548717          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2011.01.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  33 in total

1.  Neuronal responses in cat primary auditory cortex to natural and altered species-specific calls.

Authors:  D D Gehr; H Komiya; J J Eggermont
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Location of cells giving phase-locked responses to pure tones in the primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  M N Wallace; B Coomber; C J Sumner; J M S Grimsley; T M Shackleton; A R Palmer
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Subset of thin spike cortical neurons preserve the peripheral encoding of stimulus onsets.

Authors:  Frank G Lin; Robert C Liu
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Spatial representation of neural responses to natural and altered conspecific vocalizations in cat auditory cortex.

Authors:  Boris Gourévitch; Jos J Eggermont
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-10-04       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Subdivisions of auditory cortex and levels of processing in primates.

Authors:  J H Kaas; T A Hackett
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  1998 Mar-Jun       Impact factor: 1.854

6.  Responses to species-specific vocalizations in the auditory cortex of awake and anesthetized guinea pigs.

Authors:  Josef Syka; Daniel Suta; Jirí Popelár
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Processing the acoustic effect of size in speech sounds.

Authors:  K von Kriegstein; J D Warren; D T Ives; R D Patterson; T D Griffiths
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Isolation induced changes in Guinea Pig Cavia porcellus pup distress whistles.

Authors:  Patrícia F Monticelli; Rosana S Tokumaru; César Ades
Journal:  An Acad Bras Cienc       Date:  2004-06-08       Impact factor: 1.753

9.  Representation of species-specific vocalizations in the inferior colliculus of the guinea pig.

Authors:  Daniel Suta; Eugen Kvasnák; Jirí Popelár; Josef Syka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-08-27       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Vocal cues of ovulation in human females.

Authors:  Gregory A Bryant; Martie G Haselton
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 3.703

View more
  4 in total

1.  Subthreshold resonance properties contribute to the efficient coding of auditory spatial cues.

Authors:  Michiel W H Remme; Roberta Donato; Jason Mikiel-Hunter; Jimena A Ballestero; Simon Foster; John Rinzel; David McAlpine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Recognition of Modified Conditioning Sounds by Competitively Trained Guinea Pigs.

Authors:  Hisayuki Ojima; Junsei Horikawa
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 3.558

3.  Processing of communication calls in Guinea pig auditory cortex.

Authors:  Jasmine M S Grimsley; Sharad J Shanbhag; Alan R Palmer; Mark N Wallace
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Communication calls produced by electrical stimulation of four structures in the guinea pig brain.

Authors:  David B Green; Trevor M Shackleton; Jasmine M S Grimsley; Oliver Zobay; Alan R Palmer; Mark N Wallace
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.