Literature DB >> 21295877

Increasing treatment accuracy for cervical cancer patients using correlations between bladder-filling change and cervix-uterus displacements: proof of principle.

Rozilawati Ahmad1, Mischa S Hoogeman, Maria Bondar, V Dhawtal, Sandra Quint, Ilse De Pree, Jan Willem Mens, Ben J M Heijmen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate application of pre-treatment established correlations between bladder-filling changes and cervix-uterus displacements in adaptive therapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirteen cervical cancer patients participated in this prospective study. Pre-treatment, and after delivery of 40 Gy, a full bladder CT-scan was acquired, followed by voiding the bladder and acquisition of 4 other 3D scans in a 1h period with a naturally filling bladder (variable bladder filling CT-scans, VBF-scans). For the pre-treatment VBF-scans, linear correlations between bladder volume change and displacements of the tip of the uterus (ToU) and the center of mass (CoM) of markers implanted in the fornices of the vagina relative to the full bladder planning scan were established. Prediction accuracy of these correlation models was assessed by comparison with actual displacements in CT-scans, both pre-treatment and after 40 Gy. Inter-fraction ToU and marker-CoM displacements were derived from the established correlations and twice-weekly performed in-room bladder volume measurements, using a 3D ultrasound scanner.
RESULTS: Target displacement in VBF-scans ranged from up to 65 mm in a single direction to almost 0mm, depending on the patient. For pre-treatment VBF-scans, the linear correlation models predicted the mean 3D position change for the ToU of 26.1 mm±10.8 with a residual of only 2.2 mm±1.7. For the marker-CoM, the 8.4 mm±5.3 mean positioning error was predicted with a residual of 0.9 mm±0.7. After 40Gy, the mean ToU displacement was 26.8 mm±15.8, while prediction based on the pre-treatment correlation models yielded a mean residual error of 9.0 mm±3.7. Target positioning errors in the fractioned treatments were very large, especially for the ToU (-18.5mm±11.2 for systematic errors in SI-direction).
CONCLUSIONS: Pre-treatment acquired VBF-scans may be used to substantially enhance treatment precision of cervical cancer patients. Application in adaptive therapy is promising and warrants further investigation. For highly conformal (IMRT) treatments, the use of a full bladder drinking protocol results in unacceptably large systematic set-up errors.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21295877     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.11.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  10 in total

1.  Risk factors related to interfractional variation in whole pelvic irradiation for locally advanced pelvic malignancies.

Authors:  W S Yoon; D S Yang; J A Lee; S Lee; Y J Park; C Y Kim
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 2.  The role of intensity modulated radiotherapy in gynecological radiotherapy: Present and future.

Authors:  Ana Fernandez-Ots; Juanita Crook
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2013-10-03

Review 3.  Whole pelvic intensity-modulated radiotherapy for gynecological malignancies: A review of the literature.

Authors:  Rockne Hymel; Guy C Jones; Charles B Simone
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2015-01-03       Impact factor: 6.312

4.  Internal target volume for post-hysterectomy vaginal recurrences of cervical cancers during image-guided radiotherapy.

Authors:  Maheshkumar N Upasani; Supriya Chopra; Reena Engineer; Umesh Mahantshetty; Seema Medhi; Zubin Mehta; Shyam K Shrivastava
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Early morbidity and dose-volume effects in definitive radiochemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: a prospective cohort study covering modern treatment techniques.

Authors:  Yvette Seppenwoolde; Katarina Majercakova; Martin Buschmann; Elke Dörr; Alina E Sturdza; Maximilian P Schmid; Richard Pötter; Dietmar Georg
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  Validation of Fully Automated VMAT Plan Generation for Library-Based Plan-of-the-Day Cervical Cancer Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Abdul Wahab M Sharfo; Sebastiaan Breedveld; Peter W J Voet; Sabrina T Heijkoop; Jan-Willem M Mens; Mischa S Hoogeman; Ben J M Heijmen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Realizing the potential of magnetic resonance image guided radiotherapy in gynaecological and rectal cancer.

Authors:  Ingrid M White; Erica Scurr; Andreas Wetscherek; Gina Brown; Aslam Sohaib; Simeon Nill; Uwe Oelfke; David Dearnaley; Susan Lalondrelle; Shreerang Bhide
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Cone beam computed tomography-based monitoring and management of target and organ motion during external beam radiotherapy in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Nina Boje Kibsgaard Jensen; Marianne Sanggaard Assenholt; Lars Ulrik Fokdal; Anne Vestergaard; Annette Schouboe; Eva Bruun Kjaersgaard; Annette Boejen; Lars Nyvang; Jacob Christian Lindegaard; Kari Tanderup
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-12-20

9.  Analysis of Clinicopathological Factors Associated with Radiation-Induced Cystitis in Patients with Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Ling He; Zhenyu Wang; Jianhui Chen; Ling Chen; Peijuan Chen; Wenzhi Cai
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 3.822

10.  Image guided radiation therapy boost in combination with high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy for the treatment of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Xianliang Wang; Jie Li; Pei Wang; Ke Yuan; Gang Yin; Bin Wan
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2016-04-14
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.