Literature DB >> 21295085

A combined theoretical and in vitro modeling approach for predicting the magnetic capture and retention of magnetic nanoparticles in vivo.

Allan E David1, Adam J Cole, Beata Chertok, Yoon Shin Park, Victor C Yang.   

Abstract

Magnetic nanoparticles (MNP) continue to draw considerable attention as potential diagnostic and therapeutic tools in the fight against cancer. Although many interacting forces present themselves during magnetic targeting of MNP to tumors, most theoretical considerations of this process ignore all except for the magnetic and drag forces. Our validation of a simple in vitro model against in vivo data, and subsequent reproduction of the in vitro results with a theoretical model indicated that these two forces do indeed dominate the magnetic capture of MNP. However, because nanoparticles can be subject to aggregation, and large MNP experience an increased magnetic force, the effects of surface forces on MNP stability cannot be ignored. We accounted for the aggregating surface forces simply by measuring the size of MNP retained from flow by magnetic fields, and utilized this size in the mathematical model. This presumably accounted for all particle-particle interactions, including those between magnetic dipoles. Thus, our "corrected" mathematical model provided a reasonable estimate of not only fractional MNP retention, but also predicted the regions of accumulation in a simulated capillary. Furthermore, the model was also utilized to calculate the effects of MNP size and spatial location, relative to the magnet, on targeting of MNPs to tumors. This combination of an in vitro model with a theoretical model could potentially assist with parametric evaluations of magnetic targeting, and enable rapid enhancement and optimization of magnetic targeting methodologies.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21295085      PMCID: PMC3111968          DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.01.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Control Release        ISSN: 0168-3659            Impact factor:   9.776


  18 in total

1.  MR-derived cerebral blood volume maps: issues regarding histological validation and assessment of tumor angiogenesis.

Authors:  A P Pathak; K M Schmainda; B D Ward; J R Linderman; K J Rebro; A S Greene
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Hydrodynamics of magnetic drug targeting.

Authors:  P A Voltairas; D I Fotiadis; L K Michalis
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Magnetically-enabled and MR-monitored selective brain tumor protein delivery in rats via magnetic nanocarriers.

Authors:  Beata Chertok; Allan E David; Victor C Yang
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 4.  Vascular microenvironment in gliomas.

Authors:  P Vajkoczy; M D Menger
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2000 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  Significant transport of doxorubicin into the brain with polysorbate 80-coated nanoparticles.

Authors:  A E Gulyaev; S E Gelperina; I N Skidan; A S Antropov; G Y Kivman; J Kreuter
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.200

6.  Imaging blood flow in brain tumors using arterial spin labeling.

Authors:  A C Silva; S G Kim; M Garwood
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Polyethyleneimine-modified iron oxide nanoparticles for brain tumor drug delivery using magnetic targeting and intra-carotid administration.

Authors:  Beata Chertok; Allan E David; Victor C Yang
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 8.  Tumor vascular permeability and the EPR effect in macromolecular therapeutics: a review.

Authors:  H Maeda; J Wu; T Sawa; Y Matsumura; K Hori
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 9.776

9.  Substantiating in vivo magnetic brain tumor targeting of cationic iron oxide nanocarriers via adsorptive surface masking.

Authors:  Beata Chertok; Allan E David; Bradford A Moffat; Victor C Yang
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  Chemotherapy of glioblastoma in rats using doxorubicin-loaded nanoparticles.

Authors:  Sebastian C J Steiniger; Jörg Kreuter; Alexander S Khalansky; Igor N Skidan; Alexey I Bobruskin; Zoya S Smirnova; Sergey E Severin; Reiner Uhl; Martin Kock; Kathrin D Geiger; Svetlana E Gelperina
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2004-05-01       Impact factor: 7.396

View more
  9 in total

1.  Local gene targeting and cell positioning using magnetic nanoparticles and magnetic tips: comparison of mathematical simulations with experiments.

Authors:  Carsten Kilgus; Alexandra Heidsieck; Annika Ottersbach; Wilhelm Roell; Christina Trueck; Bernd K Fleischmann; Bernhard Gleich; Philipp Sasse
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Magnetic brain tumor targeting and biodistribution of long-circulating PEG-modified, cross-linked starch-coated iron oxide nanoparticles.

Authors:  Adam J Cole; Allan E David; Jianxin Wang; Craig J Galbán; Victor C Yang
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 3.  Cancer theranostics: the rise of targeted magnetic nanoparticles.

Authors:  Adam J Cole; Victor C Yang; Allan E David
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 19.536

4.  Pulsed magnetic field improves the transport of iron oxide nanoparticles through cell barriers.

Authors:  Kyoung Ah Min; Meong Cheol Shin; Faquan Yu; Meizhu Yang; Allan E David; Victor C Yang; Gus R Rosania
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 15.881

5.  A novel human artery model to assess the magnetic accumulation of SPIONs under flow conditions.

Authors:  Agata Janikowska; Jasmin Matuszak; Stefan Lyer; Eveline Schreiber; Harald Unterweger; Jan Zaloga; Jürgen Groll; Christoph Alexiou; Iwona Cicha
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Different storage conditions influence biocompatibility and physicochemical properties of iron oxide nanoparticles.

Authors:  Jan Zaloga; Christina Janko; Rohit Agarwal; Johannes Nowak; Robert Müller; Aldo R Boccaccini; Geoffrey Lee; Stefan Odenbach; Stefan Lyer; Christoph Alexiou
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Tangential Flow Ultrafiltration Allows Purification and Concentration of Lauric Acid-/Albumin-Coated Particles for Improved Magnetic Treatment.

Authors:  Jan Zaloga; Marcus Stapf; Johannes Nowak; Marina Pöttler; Ralf P Friedrich; Rainer Tietze; Stefan Lyer; Geoffrey Lee; Stefan Odenbach; Ingrid Hilger; Christoph Alexiou
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Magnetically assisted intraperitoneal drug delivery for cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  Milad Shamsi; Amir Sedaghatkish; Morteza Dejam; Mohsen Saghafian; Mehdi Mohammadi; Amir Sanati-Nezhad
Journal:  Drug Deliv       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 6.419

Review 9.  Nanoparticles for imaging: top or flop?

Authors:  Fabian Kiessling; Marianne E Mertens; Jan Grimm; Twan Lammers
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 11.105

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.