Literature DB >> 21294596

Development of 41Ca-based pharmacokinetic model for the study of bone remodelling in humans.

Manju Sharma1, Zeljko Bajzer, Susanta K Hui.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Initial studies show that 41Ca may be employed as a useful diagnostic bioassay for monitoring metabolic bone disease and its treatment management. The 41Ca-based pharmacokinetic model is developed to assess its feasibility in monitoring bone disease and clinical responsiveness to therapeutic regimens.
METHODS: A four-compartment calcium kinetic model is developed to interpret the results of clinically measured 41Ca tracer kinetics for oral and intravenous dose. This model is extended to simulate changes in bone turnover due to osteoporosis by using Gompertzian function with and without cellular accommodation. The rate constants obtained by fitting to the experimental data on drug intervention are used to simulate the impact of strategic treatment intervention.
RESULTS: The present model fits well with the available experimental data on 41Ca tracer kinetics. In the simulated osteoporotic model, the negative bone balance (i.e. bone loss) reflected by 41Ca/Ca urine ratio is used to demonstrate slow/fast increase over time compared to the normal state. The cellular accommodation impact is reflected by a recovery from perturbed balance. The model's predictive ability on the impact of therapeutic intervention is verified using published experimental data. The effect of bisphosphonate intervention results in positive bone balance (i.e. bone gain).
CONCLUSION: The four-compartment 41Ca tracer kinetic model can be flexibly used in the interpretation of results obtained from ongoing clinical studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21294596     DOI: 10.2165/11537840-000000000-00000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  29 in total

Review 1.  Toward a mathematical description of bone biology: the principle of cellular accommodation.

Authors:  C H Turner
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  Long-term predictions of the therapeutic equivalence of daily and less than daily alendronate dosing.

Authors:  C J Hernandez; G S Beaupré; R Marcus; D R Carter
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Cellular accommodation and the response of bone to mechanical loading.

Authors:  Jennifer L Schriefer; Stuart J Warden; Leanne K Saxon; Alexander G Robling; Charles H Turner
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Using disease progression models as a tool to detect drug effect.

Authors:  D R Mould; N G Denman; S Duffull
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 5.  FRAX and its applications to clinical practice.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Anders Oden; Helena Johansson; Fredrik Borgström; Oskar Ström; Eugene McCloskey
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Differences in calcium kinetics between adolescent girls and young women.

Authors:  M E Wastney; J Ng; D Smith; B R Martin; M Peacock; C M Weaver
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1996-07

7.  Skeletal retention of bisphosphonate (pamidronate) and its relation to the rate of bone resorption in patients with breast cancer and bone metastases.

Authors:  Serge C L M Cremers; Socrates E Papapoulos; Hans Gelderblom; Caroline Seynaeve; Jan den Hartigh; Pieter Vermeij; Carin C D van der Rijt; Lia van Zuylen
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2005-05-31       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Bone remodeling increases substantially in the years after menopause and remains increased in older osteoporosis patients.

Authors:  Robert Recker; Joan Lappe; K Michael Davies; Robert Heaney
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2004-07-21       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 9.  Bone physiology, disease and treatment: towards disease system analysis in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Teun M Post; Serge C L M Cremers; Thomas Kerbusch; Meindert Danhof
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 10.  Bone turnover markers: understanding their value in clinical trials and clinical practice.

Authors:  R Civitelli; R Armamento-Villareal; N Napoli
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  4 in total

1.  A Bayesian approach to an interlaboratory comparison.

Authors:  George S Jackson; Paul Muzikar; Brent Goehring
Journal:  Chemometr Intell Lab Syst       Date:  2014-12-27       Impact factor: 3.491

2.  Ultra-trace analysis of 41Ca in urine by accelerator mass spectrometry: an inter-laboratory comparison.

Authors:  George S Jackson; Darren J Hillegonds; Paul Muzikar; Brent Goehring
Journal:  Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res B       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 1.377

Review 3.  Calcium-41: a technology for monitoring changes in bone mineral.

Authors:  C M Weaver; B R Martin; G S Jackson; G P McCabe; M Peacock; M Wastney
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  The influence of therapeutic radiation on the patterns of bone remodeling in ovary-intact and ovariectomized mice.

Authors:  Susanta K Hui; Gregory R Fairchild; Louis S Kidder; Manju Sharma; Maryka Bhattacharya; Scott Jackson; Chap Le; Anna Petryk; Mohammad Saiful Islam; Douglas Yee
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2013-01-12       Impact factor: 4.333

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.