OBJECTIVE: Remission in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an increasingly attainable goal, but there is no widely used definition of remission that is stringent but achievable and could be applied uniformly as an outcome measure in clinical trials. This work was undertaken to develop such a definition. METHODS: A committee consisting of members of the American College of Rheumatology, the European League Against Rheumatism, and the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Initiative met to guide the process and review prespecified analyses from RA clinical trials. The committee requested a stringent definition (little, if any, active disease) and decided to use core set measures including, as a minimum, joint counts and levels of an acute-phase reactant to define remission. Members were surveyed to select the level of each core set measure that would be consistent with remission. Candidate definitions of remission were tested, including those that constituted a number of individual measures of remission (Boolean approach) as well as definitions using disease activity indexes. To select a definition of remission, trial data were analyzed to examine the added contribution of patient-reported outcomes and the ability of candidate measures to predict later good radiographic and functional outcomes. RESULTS: Survey results for the definition of remission suggested indexes at published thresholds and a count of core set measures, with each measure scored as 1 or less (e.g., tender and swollen joint counts, C-reactive protein [CRP] level, and global assessments on a 0-10 scale). Analyses suggested the need to include a patient-reported measure. Examination of 2-year followup data suggested that many candidate definitions performed comparably in terms of predicting later good radiographic and functional outcomes, although 28-joint Disease Activity Score-based measures of remission did not predict good radiographic outcomes as well as the other candidate definitions did. Given these and other considerations, we propose that a patient's RA can be defined as being in remission based on one of two definitions: (a) when scores on the tender joint count, swollen joint count, CRP (in mg/dl), and patient global assessment (0-10 scale) are all ≤ 1, or (b) when the score on the Simplified Disease Activity Index is ≤ 3.3. CONCLUSION: We propose two new definitions of remission, both of which can be uniformly applied and widely used in RA clinical trials. We recommend that one of these be selected as an outcome measure in each trial and that the results on both be reported for each trial.
OBJECTIVE: Remission in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an increasingly attainable goal, but there is no widely used definition of remission that is stringent but achievable and could be applied uniformly as an outcome measure in clinical trials. This work was undertaken to develop such a definition. METHODS: A committee consisting of members of the American College of Rheumatology, the European League Against Rheumatism, and the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Initiative met to guide the process and review prespecified analyses from RA clinical trials. The committee requested a stringent definition (little, if any, active disease) and decided to use core set measures including, as a minimum, joint counts and levels of an acute-phase reactant to define remission. Members were surveyed to select the level of each core set measure that would be consistent with remission. Candidate definitions of remission were tested, including those that constituted a number of individual measures of remission (Boolean approach) as well as definitions using disease activity indexes. To select a definition of remission, trial data were analyzed to examine the added contribution of patient-reported outcomes and the ability of candidate measures to predict later good radiographic and functional outcomes. RESULTS: Survey results for the definition of remission suggested indexes at published thresholds and a count of core set measures, with each measure scored as 1 or less (e.g., tender and swollen joint counts, C-reactive protein [CRP] level, and global assessments on a 0-10 scale). Analyses suggested the need to include a patient-reported measure. Examination of 2-year followup data suggested that many candidate definitions performed comparably in terms of predicting later good radiographic and functional outcomes, although 28-joint Disease Activity Score-based measures of remission did not predict good radiographic outcomes as well as the other candidate definitions did. Given these and other considerations, we propose that a patient's RA can be defined as being in remission based on one of two definitions: (a) when scores on the tender joint count, swollen joint count, CRP (in mg/dl), and patient global assessment (0-10 scale) are all ≤ 1, or (b) when the score on the Simplified Disease Activity Index is ≤ 3.3. CONCLUSION: We propose two new definitions of remission, both of which can be uniformly applied and widely used in RA clinical trials. We recommend that one of these be selected as an outcome measure in each trial and that the results on both be reported for each trial.
Authors: Lilian H D van Tuyl; David T Felson; George Wells; Josef Smolen; Bin Zhang; Maarten Boers Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2010-01-15 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Tuulikki Sokka; Merete Lund Hetland; Heidi Mäkinen; Hannu Kautiainen; Kim Hørslev-Petersen; Reijo K Luukkainen; Bernard Combe; Humeira Badsha; Alexandros A Drosos; Joe Devlin; Gianfranco Ferraccioli; Alessia Morelli; Monique Hoekstra; Maria Majdan; Stefan Sadkiewicz; Miguel Belmonte; Ann-Carin Holmqvist; Ernest Choy; Gerd R Burmester; Recep Tunc; Aleksander Dimić; Jovan Nedović; Aleksandra Stanković; Martin Bergman; Sergio Toloza; Theodore Pincus Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2008-09
Authors: A K Brown; P G Conaghan; Z Karim; M A Quinn; K Ikeda; C G Peterfy; E Hensor; R J Wakefield; P J O'Connor; P Emery Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2008-10
Authors: Theresa Kapral; Florian Dernoschnig; Klaus P Machold; Tanja Stamm; Monika Schoels; Josef S Smolen; Daniel Aletaha Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2007 Impact factor: 5.156
Authors: Nasim Ahmed Khan; Horace Jack Spencer; Essam Ahmed Abda; Rieke Alten; Christof Pohl; Codrina Ancuta; Massimiliano Cazzato; Pál Géher; Laure Gossec; Dan Henrohn; Merete Lund Hetland; Nevsun Inanc; Johannes Wg Jacobs; Eduardo Kerzberg; Maria Majdan; Omondi Oyoo; Ruben A Peredo-Wende; Zahraa Ibrahim Selim; Fotini Nikolaos Skopouli; Alberto Sulli; Kim Hørslev-Petersen; Peter C Taylor; Tuulikki Sokka Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2012-04-24 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: S J Bartlett; A K Gutierrez; A Butanis; V P Bykerk; J R Curtis; S Ginsberg; A L Leong; A Lyddiatt; W B Nowell; A M Orbai; K C Smith; C O Bingham Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2018-05-24 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Mercedes de Jorge; Sonia Parra; Jenny de la Torre-Aboki; Gabriel Herrero-Beaumont Journal: Rheumatol Int Date: 2015-01-31 Impact factor: 2.631
Authors: Helena Canhão; Ana Maria Rodrigues; Ana Filipa Mourão; Fernando Martins; Maria José Santos; José Canas-Silva; Joaquim Polido-Pereira; José Alberto Pereira Silva; José António Costa; Domingos Araújo; Cândida Silva; Helena Santos; Cátia Duarte; José Antonio Pereira da Silva; Fernando M Pimentel-Santos; Jaime Cunha Branco; Elizabeth W Karlson; João Eurico Fonseca; Daniel H Solomon Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) Date: 2012-07-28 Impact factor: 7.580