OBJECTIVE: Hypertension or high blood pressure is a strong correlate of diseases such as obesity and type 2 diabetes. We conducted a genome-wide linkage screen to identify susceptibility genes influencing systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in Mexican-Americans from the Veterans Administration Genetic Epidemiology Study (VAGES). METHODS: Using data from 1,089 individuals distributed across 266 families, we performed a multipoint linkage analysis to localize susceptibility loci for SBP and DBP by applying two models. In model 1, we added a sensible constant to the observed BP values in treated subjects [Tobin et al.; Stat Med 2005;24:2911-2935] to account for antihypertensive use (i.e. 15 and 10 mm Hg to SBP and DBP values, respectively). In model 2, we fixed values of 140 mm Hg for SBP and 90 mm Hg for DBP, if the treated values were less than the standard referenced treatment thresholds of 140/ 90 mm Hg for hypertensive status. However, if the observed treated BP values were found to be above these standard treatment thresholds, the actual observed treated BP values were retained in order not to reduce them by substitution of the treatment threshold values. RESULTS: The multipoint linkage analysis revealed strong linkage signals for SBP compared with DBP. The strongest evidence for linkage of SBP (model 1, LOD = 5.0; model 2, LOD = 3.6) was found on chromosome 6q14.1 near the marker D6S1031 (89 cM) in both models. In addition, some evidence for SBP linkage occurred on chromosomes 1q, 4p, and 16p. Most importantly, our major SBP linkage finding on chromosome 6q near marker D6S1031 was independently confirmed in a Caucasian population (LOD = 3.3). In summary, our study found evidence for a major locus on chromosome 6q influencing SBP levels in Mexican-Americans.
OBJECTIVE:Hypertension or high blood pressure is a strong correlate of diseases such as obesity and type 2 diabetes. We conducted a genome-wide linkage screen to identify susceptibility genes influencing systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in Mexican-Americans from the Veterans Administration Genetic Epidemiology Study (VAGES). METHODS: Using data from 1,089 individuals distributed across 266 families, we performed a multipoint linkage analysis to localize susceptibility loci for SBP and DBP by applying two models. In model 1, we added a sensible constant to the observed BP values in treated subjects [Tobin et al.; Stat Med 2005;24:2911-2935] to account for antihypertensive use (i.e. 15 and 10 mm Hg to SBP and DBP values, respectively). In model 2, we fixed values of 140 mm Hg for SBP and 90 mm Hg for DBP, if the treated values were less than the standard referenced treatment thresholds of 140/ 90 mm Hg for hypertensive status. However, if the observed treated BP values were found to be above these standard treatment thresholds, the actual observed treated BP values were retained in order not to reduce them by substitution of the treatment threshold values. RESULTS: The multipoint linkage analysis revealed strong linkage signals for SBP compared with DBP. The strongest evidence for linkage of SBP (model 1, LOD = 5.0; model 2, LOD = 3.6) was found on chromosome 6q14.1 near the marker D6S1031 (89 cM) in both models. In addition, some evidence for SBP linkage occurred on chromosomes 1q, 4p, and 16p. Most importantly, our major SBP linkage finding on chromosome 6q near marker D6S1031 was independently confirmed in a Caucasian population (LOD = 3.3). In summary, our study found evidence for a major locus on chromosome 6q influencing SBP levels in Mexican-Americans.
Authors: Sue Rutherford; Guowen Cai; Juan C Lopez-Alvarenga; Jack W Kent; V Saroja Voruganti; J Michael Proffitt; Joanne E Curran; Mathew P Johnson; Thomas D Dyer; Jeremy B Jowett; Raul A Bastarrachea; Larry D Atwood; Harald H H Goring; Jean W Maccluer; Eric K Moses; John Blangero; Anthony G Comuzzie; Shelley A Cole Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2007-08-20 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Patricia M Kearney; Megan Whelton; Kristi Reynolds; Paul Muntner; Paul K Whelton; Jiang He Journal: Lancet Date: 2005 Jan 15-21 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Christopher Newton-Cheh; Nancy R Cook; Martin VanDenburgh; Eric B Rimm; Paul M Ridker; Christine M Albert Journal: Circulation Date: 2009-11-09 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Elin Org; Susana Eyheramendy; Peeter Juhanson; Christian Gieger; Peter Lichtner; Norman Klopp; Gudrun Veldre; Angela Döring; Margus Viigimaa; Siim Sõber; Kärt Tomberg; Gertrud Eckstein; Piret Kelgo; Tiina Rebane; Sue Shaw-Hawkins; Philip Howard; Abiodun Onipinla; Richard J Dobson; Stephen J Newhouse; Morris Brown; Anna Dominiczak; John Connell; Nilesh Samani; Martin Farrall; Mark J Caulfield; Patricia B Munroe; Thomas Illig; H-Erich Wichmann; Thomas Meitinger; Maris Laan Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2009-03-20 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Peng Lin; Sarah M Hartz; Jen-Chyong Wang; Arpana Agrawal; Tian-Xiao Zhang; Nicholas McKenna; Kathleen Bucholz; Andrew I Brooks; Jay A Tischfield; Howard J Edenberg; Victor M Hesselbrock; John R Kramer; Samuel Kuperman; Marc A Schuckit; Alison M Goate; Laura J Bierut; John P Rice Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2012-06-15 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Gengsheng Chen; Lisa de las Fuentes; Chi C Gu; Jiang He; Dongfeng Gu; Tanika Kelly; James Hixson; Cashell Jacquish; D C Rao; Treva K Rice Journal: BMC Genet Date: 2015-06-20 Impact factor: 2.797