Literature DB >> 22606049

Interactions of several lipid-related gene polymorphisms and cigarette smoking on blood pressure levels.

Rui-Xing Yin1, Dong-Feng Wu, Jin-Zhen Wu, Xiao-Li Cao, Lynn Htet Htet Aung, Lin Miao, Xing-Jiang Long, Wan-Ying Liu, Lin Zhang, Meng Li.   

Abstract

The interactions of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and cigarette smoking on blood pressure levels are limited. The present study was undertaken to detect nine lipid-related SNPs and their interactions with cigarette smoking on blood pressure levels. Genotyping of ATP-binding cassette transporter A1 (ABCA-1) V825I, acyl-CoA:cholesterol acyltransferase-1 (ACAT-1) rs1044925, low density lipoprotein receptor (LDL-R) AvaⅡ, hepatic lipase gene (LIPC) -250G>A, endothelial lipase gene (LIPG) 584C>T, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) 677C>T, proprotein convertase subtilisin-like kexin type 9 (PCSK9) E670G, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta (PPARD) +294T>C, and Scavenger receptor class B type 1 (SCARB1) rs5888 was performed in 935 nonsmokers and 845 smokers. The interactions were detected by factorial regression analysis. The frequencies of genotypes (ACAT-1 and LIPG), alleles (ABCA-1), and both genotypes and alleles (LDL-R, LIPC, PPARD and SCARB1) were different between nonsmokers and smokers (P < 0.05-0.001). The levels of pulse pressure (PP, ABCA-1), and systolic, diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP) and PP (LIPC) in nonsmokers were different among the genotypes (P < 0.01-0.001). The levels of SBP (ABCA-1, ACAT-1, LIPG and PCSK9), DBP (ACAT-1, LDL-R, LIPC, PCSK9 and PPARD), and PP (LIPC, LIPG, MTHFR and PCSK9) in smokers were different among the genotypes (P < 0.01-0.001). The SNPs of ABCA-1, ACAT-1 and PCSK9; ACAT-1, LDL-R, MTHFR and PCSK9; and ABCA-1, LIPC, PCSK9 and PPARD were shown interactions with cigarette smoking to influence SBP, DBP and PP levels (P < 0.05-0.001); respectively. The differences in blood pressure levels between the nonsmokers and smokers might partly result from different interactions of several SNPs and cigarette smoking.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blood pressure; cigarette smoking; genetic polymorphism; hypertension; interaction.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22606049      PMCID: PMC3354626          DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.4401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biol Sci        ISSN: 1449-2288            Impact factor:   6.580


Introduction

Hypertension is a complex disease that affects 1 billion people and causes more than 7.1 million premature deaths a year worldwide 1. It is well-recognized that blood pressure is modulated by multiple genetic loci as well as environmental and lifestyle factors including diet, smoking habits, obesity and physical inactivity 2,3, and their interactions 4-9. Many previous genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in different populations have simultaneously explored a large number of genomic loci associated with blood pressure and hypertension, but the results of these association studies conducted with blood pressure traits have been inconsistent 10-18. A major reason for inconsistency among studies may be different environmental modifiers that interact with genes to influence blood pressure and hypertension. Although the deleterious effects of cigarette smoking on the cardiovascular system have been clearly documented, the relationship between cigarette smoking and blood pressure and hypertension has not been fully characterized 19. Some studies have reported that cigarette smoking is associated with increased blood pressure 20-22, others reported associations with decreased blood pressure 23-25, while some found no effect at all 26,27. However, cigarette smoking has proven to be an important mediator of genetic effects in association studies of blood pressure and hypertension 4-9. There are 56 ethnic groups in China. Yao is the eleventh largest minority among the 55 minority groups according to the population size. Bai Ku Yao (White-trouser Yao), an isolated subgroup of the Yao minority, is named so because all of men wear white knee-length knickerbockers. The population size is about 30 000. Because of isolation from the other ethnic groups, the special customs and cultures including their clothing, intra-ethnic marriages, dietary patterns, and corn wine and rum intakes are still completely preserved to the present day. In previous epidemiological studies, we found that the prevalence of hypertension was higher in smokers than in nonsmokers 2,3. Since hypertension is found to occur more often than expected in families with familial combined hyperlipidemia and other types of familial lipid syndromes 28, genes involved in lipid metabolism may be involved in the genetic component of the development of hypertension. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to detect nine single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in different lipid-related genes and evaluate their interactions with cigarette smoking on blood pressure levels in the Guangxi Bai Ku Yao population.

Materials and Methods

Subjects

A total of 1780 unrelated subjects of Bai Ku Yao who reside in Lihu and Baxu villages in Nandan County, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, People's Republic of China were randomly selected from our previous stratified randomized cluster samples 2,3. The age of the subjects ranged from 15 to 80 years, with an average age of 41.60 ± 16.43 years. There were 935 nonsmokers (285 males and 650 females) and 845 smokers (709 males and 136 females). All of the subjects were rural agricultural workers. The subjects had no evidence of diseases related to atherosclerosis, coronary artery disease and diabetes. None of them had been treated with antihypertensive drugs, such as nifedipine and/or catopril and lipid-lowering drugs. The study design was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital, Guangxi Medical University. All participants have given written informed consent.

Epidemiological survey

The survey was done according to standardized methods. Information on personal and demographic characteristics, personal and family history of disease, current pharmacotherapy, cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, and physical activity was obtained at interview. Self-reported information on cigarette smoking was recorded. All participants were asked, “Have you smoked at least 100 cigarettes in your entire life?” and “Do you now smoke cigarettes every day, some days or not at all?” Smoking status was re-coded as: “Smokers” or “current smokers” if the respondents reported having smoked at least 100 cigarettes in their lifetime and were current smokers either every day or some days; “nonsmokers” or “never smokers” if they reported they had not smoked at least 100 cigarettes in their lifetime; and “former smokers” if they reported having smoked 100 cigarettes in their lifetime but did not currently smoke 29,30. “Former smokers” were not included in this study. Sitting blood pressure was measured three times by a well-trained physician with the use of a standard mercury sphygmomanometer after the subject rested 5 minutes, and the average of the three measurements was used for the level of blood pressure. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) was determined by the first Korotkoff sound, and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) by the fifth Korotkoff sound. Pulse pressure (PP) was calculated as the systolic minus the diastolic blood pressure. Body weight, to the nearest 50 grams, was measured using a portable balance scale. Subjects were weighed without shoes and in a minimum of clothing. Height was measured, to the nearest 0.5 cm, using a portable steel measuring device. From these two measurements body mass index (BMI, kg/m2) was calculated. Waist circumference was measured with a nonstretchable measuring tape, at the level of the smallest area of the waist, to the nearest 0.1 cm.

Measurements of lipids and apolipoproteins

A venous blood sample of 5 mL was obtained from all subjects after at least 12 hours of fasting. A part of the sample (2 mL) was collected into glass tubes and used to determine serum lipid levels. Another part of the sample (3 mL) was transferred to tubes with anticoagulate solution and used to extract deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA). The levels of total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in samples were determined by enzymatic methods. Serum apolipoprotein (Apo) A1 and ApoB levels were detected by the immunoturbidimetric immunoassay. All determinations were performed with an autoanalyzer (Type 7170A; Hitachi Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) in our Clinical Science Experiment Center 31,32.

Genotyping

Genomic DNA was extracted from the peripheral blood leukocytes by the phenol-chloroform method as our previous reports 33-40. Genotyping of ATP-binding cassette transporter A1 (ABCA-1) V825I (rs2066715), acyl-CoA:cholesterol acyltransferase-1 (ACAT-1) rs1044925, low density lipoprotein receptor (LDL-R) AvaⅡ, hepatic lipase gene (LIPC) -250G>A (rs2070895), endothelial lipase gene (LIPG) 584C>T (rs2000813), methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) 677C>T (rs1801133), proprotein convertase subtilisin-like kexin type 9 (PCSK9) E670G (rs505151), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta (PPARD) +294T>C (rs2016520) and Scavenger receptor class B type 1 (SCARB1) rs5888 was performed using polymerase chain reaction and restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP). The sequences of the forward and backward primers and restriction ezyme used for the genotyping of nine SNPs, the thermocycling protocol, the approach to electrophoresis, and the procedures for quality control have been described previously 33-40. Genotypes were scored by an experienced reader blinded to epidemiological data and blood pressure levels.

Diagnostic criteria

Hypertension was defined as an average SBP of 140 mmHg or greater and/or an average DBP of 90 mmHg or greater 2,3. The normal values of serum TC, TG, HDL-C, LDL-C, ApoA1 and ApoB levels, and the ratio of ApoA1 to ApoB in our Clinical Science Experiment Center were 3.10-5.17, 0.56-1.70, 0.91-1.81, 2.70-3.20 mmol/L, 1.00-1.78, 0.63-1.14 g/L, and 1.00-2.50; respectively 31,32.

Statistical analysis

Quantitative variables were presented as mean ± SD or percentage. All statistical analyses were done with the statistical software package SPSS 13.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA). Chi square tests were used to compare the differences in percentages and to assess Hardy-Weinberg expectations, whereas analysis of covariance (ANOVA) was used to compare the differences in various continuous variables between respective comparison groups. The sex, age, education level, physical activity, BMI, waist circumference, alcohol consumption, and hyperlipidemia were adjusted for the statistical analyses. All significant associations were corrected for multiple testing by applying a Bonferroni correction. The allelic and genotypic frequencies were calculated from the observed genotypic counts. The interactions of nine SNPs and cigarette smoking on blood pressure levels were assessed by using a factorial regression analysis after controlling for potential confounders including sex, age, education level, physical activity, BMI, waist circumference, alcohol consumption, and hyperlipidemia. Multiple linear regression was used to ascertain the correlation between genotypes (ABCA-1 V825I: GG = 1, GA = 2, AA = 3; ACAT-1 rs1044925: AA = 1, AC = 2, CC = 3; LDL-R AvaⅡ: A-A- = 1, A-A+ = 2, A+A+ = 3; LIPC -250G>A: GG = 1, GA = 2, AA = 3; LIPG 584C>T: CC = 1, CT = 2, TT = 3; MTHFR 677C>T: CC = 1, CT = 2, TT = 3; PCSK9 E670G: AA = 1, AG = 2; PPARD +294T>C: TT = 1, TC = 2, CC = 3; SCARB1 rs5888: CC = 1, CT = 2, TT = 3) or alleles (the minor allele noncarrier = 1, the minor allele carrier = 2) and blood pressure levels in the combined population of nonsmokers and smokers, nonsmokers, and smokers; respectively.

Results

General characteristics between nonsmokers and smokers

As shown in Table 1, the levels of average age, height, weight, waist circumference, SBP, DBP, hypertensive prevalence, TC, TG, HDL-C, ApoA1; the ratio of ApoA1 to ApoB; the percentages of subjects who consumed alcohol; and the ratio of males to females were higher in smokers than in nonsmokers (P < 0.05-0.001). There were no significant differences in the levels of education, BMI, PP, LDL-C and ApoB between smokers and nonsmokers (P > 0.05 for all).
Table 1

The general characteristics and blood pressure levels between the nonsmokers and smokers.

CharacteristicsNonsmoker(n = 935)Smoker(n = 845)t2)p
Age (years)39.75±16.3143.64±16.32-5.0230.000
Male/female285/650709/136513.7510.000
Education level (years)6.20±3.266.31±3.160.7210.471
Height (cm)151.73±7.39158.13±7.28-18.3780.000
Weight (kg)51.40±8.0955.07±8.50-9.3110.000
Body mass index (kg/m2)22.30±2.9022.10±2.531.5590.119
> 24 kg/m2 [n(%)]223 (23.9)134 (15.9)17.6830.000
Waist circumference (cm)71.84±8.8474.23±8.125.9200.000
Alcohol consumption [n (%)]246 (26.3)602 (71.2)361.4710.000
Systolic blood pressure (SBP, mmHg)119.20±17.31122.78±15.50-4.6060.000
SBP ≥ 140 mmHg [n (%)]110 (11.8)121 (14.3)2.5650.109
Diastolic blood pressure (DBP, mmHg)74.87±10.3777.63±9.47-5.8820.000
DBP ≥ 90 mmHg [n (%)]111 (11.9)106 (12.5)0.1880.665
Pulse pressure (mmHg)44.34±11.9645.16±11.77-1.4630.144
Hypertensive prevalence [n (%)]151 (16.1)169 (20.0)4.4620.035
Total cholesterol (mmol/L)4.48±0.934.60±1.06-2.6530.008
Triglycerides (mmol/L)1.23±1.081.38±1.24-2.6860.007
HDL-C (mmol/L)1.74±0.461.84±0.49-4.1530.000
LDL-C (mmol/L)2.59±0.692.59±0.87-0.1010.920
Apolipoprotein (Apo) A1 (g/L)1.33±0.291.41±0.33-5.6940.000
ApoB (g/L)0.86±0.220.88±0.23-1.6460.101
ApoA1/ApoB1.64±0.591.73±0.74-2.8780.004

Genotypic and allelic frequencies between nonsmokers and smokers

The genotypic and allelic frequencies of the nine SNPs between nonsmokers and smokers are shown in Table 2. The genotypic distribution of nine SNPs was consistent with the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. The genotypic and allelic frequencies of LDL-R, LIPC, PPARD and SCARB1 were different between nonsmokers and smokers (P < 0.05-0.001). The genotypic frequencies of ACAT-1 and LIPG, and the allelic frequencies of ABCA-1 were also different between nonsmokers and smokers (P < 0.05 for all). There were no significant differences in the genotypic and allelic frequencies of MTHFR and PCSK9 between nonsmokers and smokers (P < 0.05 for all). The GG homozygous of the PCSK9 E670G was not detected in our study population.
Table 2

The genotypic and allelic frequencies between nonsmokers and smokers.

SNPGenotype(Allele)Nonsmoker(n = 935)Smoker(n = 845)P Value
ABCA-1 V825IGG307(32.8)308(36.5)
GA448(47.9)399(47.2)
AA180(19.3)138(16.3)0.146
G1062(56.8)1015(60.1)
A808(43.2)675(39.9)0.048
ACAT-1 rs1044925AA660(70.6)592(70.1)
AC252(27.0)213(25.2)
CC23(2.4)40(4.7)0.030
A1572(84.1)1397(82.7)
C298(15.9)293(17.3)0.262
LDL-R AvaⅡA-A-468(50.1)378(44.7)
A-A+422(45.1)301(35.6)
A+A+45(4.8)166(19.7)0.000
A-1358(72.6)1057(62.5)
A+512(27.4)633(37.5)0.000
LIPC -250G>AGG433(46.3)350(41.4)
GA433(46.3)350(41.4)
AA69(7.4)145(17.2)0.000
G1299(69.5)1050(62.1)
A571(30.5)640(37.9)0.000
LIPG 584C>TCC432(46.2)362(42.8)
CT469(50.2)430(50.9)
TT34(3.6)53(6.3)0.024
C1333(71.3)1154(68.3)
T537(28.7)536(31.7)0.051
MTHFR 677C>TCC431(46.1)416(49.2)
CT437(46.7)367(43.5)
TT67(7.2)62(7.3)0.340
C1299(69.5)1199(70.9)
T571(30.5)491(29.1)0.335
PCSK9 E670GAA892(95.4)793(93.8)
AG43(4.6)52(6.2)
GG0(0)0(0)0.145
A1827(97.7)1638(96.9)
G43(2.3)52(3.1)0.151
PPARD +294T>CTT517(55.3)496(58.7)
TC347(37.1)313(37.0)
CC71(7.6)36(4.3)0.011
T1381(73.9)1305(77.2)
C489(26.1)385(22.8)0.020
SCARB1 rs5888CC534(57.1)408(48.3)
CT367(39.3)371(43.9)
TT34(3.6)66(7.8)0.000
C1435(76.7)1187(70.2)
T435(23.3)503(29.8)0.000

SNP: single nucleotide polymorphism; ABCA-1: ATP-binding cassette transporter A1; ACAT-1: acyl-CoA:cholesterol acyltransferase-1; LDL-R: low density lipoprotein receptor; LIPC: hepatic lipase gene; LIPG: endothelial lipase gene; MTHFR: methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase; PCSK9: proprotein convertase subtilisin-like kexin type 9; PPARD: peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta; SCARB1: Scavenger receptor class B type 1.

Genotypes and blood pressure levels between nonsmokers and smokers

The association of genotypes and blood pressure levels between nonsmokers and smokers is shown in Figure 1. The levels of PP in nonsmokers were different among the three genotypes of ABCA-1 (P < 0.01), and the levels of SBP, DBP and PP in nonsmokers were also different among the three genotypes of LIPC (P < 0.01-0.001).
Figure 1

The genotypes of nine SNPs and blood pressure levels between the nonsmokers and smokers. aP < 0.01, bP < 0.005, and cP < 0.001.

For the smokers, the levels of SBP were different among the three genotypes of ABCA-1, ACAT-1, LIPG and PCSK9 (P < 0.01-0.001), the levels of DBP were different among the three genotypes of ACAT-1, LDL-R, LIPC, PCSK9 and PPARD (P < 0.01-0.001), and the levels of PP were different among the three genotypes of LIPC, LIPG, MTHFR and PCSK9 (P < 0.01-0.001).

Interactions of several SNPs and cigarette smoking on blood pressure levels

The interactions of nine SNPs and cigarette smoking on blood pressure levels are given in Table 3. The genotypes of ABCA-1 GG and GA and ACAT-1 AA and AC were shown interactions with cigarette smoking to increase SBP levels, whereas the genotype of PCSK9 AG was shown interactions with cigarette smoking to decrease SBP levels (P < 0.05-0.001). The genotypes of ACAT-1 AA and AC, LDL-R A-A-, A-A+ and A+A+, MTHFR CC and CT, and PCSK9 AA were shown consistent interactions with cigarette smoking to increase DBP levels (P < 0.05-0.01). The genotypes of ABCA-1 GA and LIPC GG were shown interactions with cigarette smoking to increase PP levels, whereas the genotypes of PCSK9 AA and AG, and PPARD CC were shown interactions with cigarette smoking to decrease PP levels (P < 0.05-0.001).
Table 3

Interactions of several single nucleotide polymorphisms and cigarette smoking on blood pressure levels.

SNPGenotype(F/P)SBPDBPPP
ABCA-1 V825IGG--
GA-
AA---
F3.9181.1683.739
P0.0200.3110.024
ACAT-1 rs1044925AA-
AC-
CC---
F3.6774.2931.043
P0.0260.0140.353
LDL-R AvaⅡA-A---
A-A+--
A+A+--
F0.4584.7170.950
P0.6330.0090.387
LIPC -250G>AGG--
GA---
AA---
F0.7611.4244.514
P0.4670.2410.011
LIPG 584C>TCC---
CT---
TT---
0.5820.0351.446
0.5590.9650.236
MTHFR 677C>TCC--
CT--
TT---
F0.0973.2662.068
P0.9080.0380.127
PCSK9 E670GAA-
AG-
F18.6103.84715.401
P0.0000.0500.000
PPARD +294T>CTT---
TC---
CC--
F0.9191.3224.738
P0.3990.2670.009
SCARB1 rs5888CC---
CT---
TT---
F1.0581.0551.607
P0.3470.3490.201

SNP: single nucleotide polymorphism; ABCA-1: ATP-binding cassette transporter A1; ACAT-1: acyl-CoA:cholesterol acyltransferase-1; LDL-R: low density lipoprotein receptor; LIPC: hepatic lipase gene; LIPG: endothelial lipase gene; MTHFR: methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase; PCSK9: proprotein convertase subtilisin-like kexin type 9; PPARD: peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta; SCARB1: Scavenger receptor class B type 1; ↑: genotype and cigarette smoking interactions to increase blood pressure; ↓: genotype and cigarette smoking interactions to decrease blood pressure; -: no interaction of genotype and cigarette smoking on blood pressure.

Correlation between genotypes or alleles and blood pressure levels

The results of multiple linear regression analysis between genotypes or alleles and blood pressure levels are shown in Table 4. For the nonsmokers, the levels of SBP were associated with the genotypes of LIPC (P < 0.01); the levels of DBP were associated with the genotypes and/or alleles of LIPG and PPARD (P < 0.05 for all); and the levels of PP were associated with the genotypes and/or alleles of LIPC (P < 0.05 for each).
Table 4

Correlation between genotypes or alleles and blood pressure levels in the nonsmokers and smokers.

BPGenotype/alleleUnstandardized coefficientStd. errorStandardized coefficienttP
Both
SBPABCA-1 V825I allele-1.5840.717-0.045-2.2090.027
LIPC -250G>A genotype2.1370.4880.0904.3760.000
LIPC -250G>A allele1.3370.6610.0422.0210.043
LIPG 584C>T allele1.7900.7300.0512.4530.014
MTHFR 677C>T genotype1.0450.4280.0552.4400.015
MTHFR 677C>T allele1.1670.5320.0502.1940.028
PCSK9 E670G genotype-5.3891.767-0.063-3.0500.002
DBPACAT-1 rs1044925 genotype1.0250.3140.0743.2650.001
ACAT-1 rs1044925 allele1.2650.3730.0773.3920.001
LIPC -250G>A genotype1.3080.3210.0894.0700.000
LIPC -250G>A allele1.1180.4350.0562.5700.010
LIPG 584C>T genotype1.0340.3900.0572.6550.008
LIPG 584C>T allele1.3230.4540.0632.9140.004
PPARD +294T>C allele-1.0250.459-0.050-2.2310.026
PPMTHFR 677C>T genotype0.7390.3600.4702.0530.040
PCSK9 E670G genotype-4.6551.389-0.0693.3500.001
Nonsmoker
SBPLIPC -250G>A genotype2.1920.7510.0852.9200.004
DBPLIPG 584C>T genotype1.1950.5620.0632.2140.034
LIPG 584C>T allele1.4660.6370.0692.3030.022
PPARD +294T>C allele-1.3610.652-0.065-2.0890.037
PPLIPC -250G>A genotype1.8380.5720.0993.2110.001
LIPC -250G>A allele1.5440.7160.0672.1580.031
Smoker
SBPABCA-1 V825I genotype-2.0770.671-0.094-3.0980.002
ABCA-1 V825I allele-2.6690.976-0.083-2.7350.006
LIPG 584C>T allele2.5600.9630.0812.6590.008
PCSK9 E670G genotype-11.8042.139-0.164-5.5190.000
DBPABCA-1 V825I genotype-0.9340.441-0.069-2.1180.034
ABCA-1 V825I allele-1.4310.641-0.073-2.2310.026
ACAT-1 rs1044925 genotype1.5330.4330.1193.5430.000
ACAT-1 rs1044925 allele2.3360.5350.1464.3630.000
LDL-R AvaⅡallele-1.1840.581-0.066-2.0390.042
PCSK9 E670G genotype-2.9231.469-0.064-1.9890.047
PPABCA-1 V825I genotype-1.1790.527-0.070-2.2370.026
LIPC -250G>A allele-1.7310.715-0.077-2.4210.016
LIPG 584C>T allele1.5340.7260.0692.1130.035
MTHFR 677C>T genotype1.2260.5450.0752.2490.025
PCSK9 E670G genotype-9.6431.670-0.178-5.7750.000

BP: blood pressure; SBP: systolic blood pressure; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; PP: pulse pressure; ABCA-1: ATP-binding cassette transporter A1; ACAT-1: acyl-CoA:cholesterol acyltransferase-1; LDL-R: low density lipoprotein receptor; LIPC: hepatic lipase gene; LIPG: endothelial lipase gene; MTHFR: methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase; PCSK9: proprotein convertase subtilisin-like kexin type 9; PPARD: peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta; SCARB1: Scavenger receptor class B type 1.

For the smokers, the levels of SBP were correlated with the genotypes and/or alleles of ABCA-1, LIPG and PCSK9 (P < 0.01 for all), the levels of DBP were correlated with the genotypes and/or alleles of ABCA-1, ACAT-1, LDL-R and PCSK9 (P < 0.05-0.001), and the levels of PP were correlated with the genotypes and/or alleles of ABCA-1, LIPC, LIPG, MTHFR and PCSK9 (P < 0.05-0.001).

Discussion

In the present study, we showed that the genotypic frequencies of ACAT-1 and LIPG, the allelic frequencies of ABCA-1, and the genotypic and allelic frequencies of LDL-R, LIPC, PPARD and SCARB1 were different between nonsmokers and smokers. These results indicate that several lipid-related genes may also involve in the regulation of blood pressure. In the current study, our study population, Bai Ku Yao, is an isolated subgroup of the Yao minority in China. Strict intra-ethnic marriages have been performed in this population from time immemorial. But they can not intermarry within the direct descendant blood kin and the collateral branch blood kin in seven generations 2,3,31,32. Thus, this population is thought to share the same ethnic ancestry and to possess a homogeneous genetic background. Although genetic variants in some genes have been associated with risk of hypertension in some studies, the results of these association studies conducted with blood pressure traits are inconsistent 8-16. The association of these SNPs and blood pressure levels between nonsmokers and smokers has not yet been thoroughly studied. In the present study, we showed that the levels of PP in nonsmokers were different among the three genotypes of ABCA-1, and the levels of SBP, DBP and PP in nonsmokers were also different among the three genotypes of LIPC. The levels of SBP in smokers were different among the three genotypes of ABCA-1, ACAT-1, LIPG and PCSK9, the levels of DBP were different among the three genotypes of ACAT-1, LDL-R, LIPC, PCSK9 and PPARD, and the levels of PP were different among the three genotypes of LIPC, LIPG, MTHFR and PCSK9. To the best of our knowledge, the association between ABCA-1 V825I, ACAT-1 rs1044925, LIPC -250G>A, LIPG 584C>T, PCSK9 E670G, and SCARB1 rs5888 SNPs and blood pressure variation has not been previously explored. The association of LDL-R AvaII, MTHFR C677T and PPARD +294T>C SNPs and blood pressure variation has been evaluated in several previous studies 41-55. However, the findings are inconsistent. Liu et al. 41 found that there were no differences in the genotypic and allelic frequencies of LDL-R AvaII between normotensives and essential hypertensives in Shanghai. Rodríguez-Esparragón et al. 42 reported that TT genotype of MTHFR C677T was associated with an increased risk of hypertension in males. A previous meta-analysis showed that the MTHFR C677T was consistently associated with severe diastolic hypertension during pregnancy 43. The MTHFR C667T modulated baseline DBP and DBP responsiveness by short-term treatment of benazepril 44,45. A significant association between MTHFR C677T and hypertension/hypertension-in-pregnancy in both Caucasian and Asian populations was also observed in a recent meta-analysis 46. The patients carrying MTHFR 677T allele were at increased risk of hypertension. The frequency of co-occurrence of MTHFR 677CT/1298CC genotypes was significantly higher in the patients compared to controls (P < 0.05) and was associated with increased risk of hypertension 47. Marinho et al. 48 showed that genotype distribution of MTHFR differed significantly between control and hypertensive patients with a greater prevalence of CT genotypes. The MTHFR 677C allele was significantly more frequent in controls compared with patients with essential hypertension (P < 0.05), and CC genotype was more frequent in controls compared to patients with essential hypertension 49. However, several studies showed that there were no associations of MTHFR C677T and the prevalence of hypertension or blood pressure levels 50-52. Gao et al. 53 reported that PPAR-gamma2 SNP is associated with hypertension in the Han population of Inner Mongolia. The frequency of Ala allele was lower in patients with hypertension (1.3%) than in controls (3.6%, P = 0.018). The Pro12Ala polymorphism in PPAR-gamma was associated with blood pressure in subjects with type 2 diabetes. The subjects with Pro/Ala (24%) or Ala/Ala (2%) had lower DBP when adjusted for age and gender compared with Pro/Pro subjects (74%). This association was restricted to men, who also had a borderline significant difference in SBP 54. However, Yan et al. 55 reported that the frequencies of the PPARD +294T>C genotypes were not different among the groups of metabolic syndrome, essential hypertension, and type 2 diabetes. The interactions of these SNPs and cigarette smoking on blood pressure levels are not fully known. In the present study, the genotypes of ABCA-1 GG and GA and ACAT-1 AA and AC were shown interactions with cigarette smoking to increase SBP levels, whereas the genotype of PCSK9 AG was shown interactions with cigarette smoking to decrease SBP levels. The genotypes of ACAT-1 AA and AC, LDL-R A-A-, A-A+ and A+A+, MTHFR CC and CT, and PCSK9 AA were shown consistent interactions with cigarette smoking to increase DBP levels. The genotypes of ABCA-1 GA and LIPC GG were shown interactions with cigarette smoking to increase PP levels, whereas the genotypes of PCSK9 AA and AG, and PPARD CC were shown interactions with cigarette smoking to decrease PP levels. These findings suggest that some blood pressure parameters in our study subjects were partly influenced by the interactions of several SNPs and cigarette smoking. Smoking cessation and other healthy lifestyles are necessary for maintaining of normal blood pressure. The effect of different types of cigarettes on blood pressure levels is not well known. In our current study, 95% of the cigarettes smoked by the subjects were natural tobacco leaves, which the toxin content may be high. Tobacco smoke is a complex mixture of over 4,000 chemical constituents. There are many toxins in cigarette smoke such as nicotine, cadmium, carbon monoxide, and reactive oxygen species that might contribute to the cardiovascular toxicity 56. Thus, the interactions of SNPs and different kinds of cigarettes on blood pressure levels still need to be determined.

Study Limitations

The present study has several potential limitations. First, we did not match smokers and nonsmokers in terms of sex; therefore, the smokers had a much higher proportion of males than did the nonsmokers. Among young and middle-aged adults, population surveys have shown hypertension to be more frequent among males than females, with sex differences of 4% in the United States, 8% in Canada, and 11% in Western Europe 57. Second, the levels of average age, height, weight, waist circumference, and the percentages of subjects who consumed alcohol were higher in smokers than in nonsmokers. Although sex, age, education level, physical activity, BMI, waist circumference, alcohol consumption, and hyperlipidemia have been adjusted for the statistical analysis, we could not completely eliminate the potential effects of these factors on blood pressure levels among different genotypes in both groups. Third, the diet was not adjusted for the statistical analysis. In the present study, however, the diet in this population is consistent throughout the year and among individuals because of the Bai Ku Yao's reliance on a limited number of locally available food items. Their staple food is corn gruel or corn tortillas. On ordinary days, they are vegetarians 2,3. Finally, it is clearly established that blood pressure levels are regulated by multiple environmental and genetic factors, and their interactions. Although we have detected the interactions of nine SNPs and cigarette smoking on blood pressure levels in this study, there are still many unmeasured environmental and genetic factors and their interactions. Thus, the interactions of gene-gene, gene-environment, and environment-environment on blood pressure levels remain to be determined.

Conclusion

Several lipid-related gene polymorphisms in nonsmokers and smokers were found to be associated with blood pressure levels in the Guangxi Bai Ku Yao population. The interactions of ABCA-1 AA and AC and ACAT-1 AA and AC genotypes and cigarette smoking to increase SBP, and PCSK9 AG genotype and cigarette smoking to decrease SBP; ACAT-1 AA and AC, LDL-R A-A-, A-A+ and A+A+, MTHFR CC and CT, and PCSK9 AA genotypes and cigarette smoking to increase DBP levels; and ABCA-1 GA and LIPC GG genotypes and cigarette smoking to increase PP, and PCSK9 AA and AG, and PPARD CC genotypes and cigarette smoking to decrease PP levels were also detected. The observed associations and interactions between these SNPs and blood pressure variation in this isolated ethnic subgroup may also be the major characteristics of this condition in the other ethnic groups, especially in the minorities. However, large studies of populations with different ethnic origins are required to confirm these observations.
  57 in total

1.  Association of the PPARgamma2 gene Pro12Ala variant with primary hypertension and metabolic lipid disorders in Han Chinese of Inner Mongolia.

Authors:  L Gao; L Wang; H Yun; L Su; X Su
Journal:  Genet Mol Res       Date:  2010-07-06

2.  A common haplotype on methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene modifies the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor on blood pressure in essential hypertension patients--a family-based association study.

Authors:  Shanqun Jiang; Yi-Hsiang Hsu; Tianhua Niu; Xin Xu; Houxun Xing; Changzhong Chen; Xiaobin Wang; Yan Zhang; Shaojie Peng; Xiping Xu
Journal:  Clin Exp Hypertens       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.749

3.  Disparities in hypertension control advice according to smoking status.

Authors:  Alberto J Caban-Martinez; Evelyn P Davila; Wei Zhao; Kristopher Arheart; Monica Webb Hooper; Margaret Byrne; Antoine Messiah; Noella Dietz; Youjie Huang; Lora E Fleming; David J Lee
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2010-06-19       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  Genome-wide association study of blood pressure extremes identifies variant near UMOD associated with hypertension.

Authors:  Sandosh Padmanabhan; Olle Melander; Toby Johnson; Anna Maria Di Blasio; Wai K Lee; Davide Gentilini; Claire E Hastie; Cristina Menni; Maria Cristina Monti; Christian Delles; Stewart Laing; Barbara Corso; Gerjan Navis; Arjan J Kwakernaak; Pim van der Harst; Murielle Bochud; Marc Maillard; Michel Burnier; Thomas Hedner; Sverre Kjeldsen; Björn Wahlstrand; Marketa Sjögren; Cristiano Fava; Martina Montagnana; Elisa Danese; Ole Torffvit; Bo Hedblad; Harold Snieder; John M C Connell; Morris Brown; Nilesh J Samani; Martin Farrall; Giancarlo Cesana; Giuseppe Mancia; Stefano Signorini; Guido Grassi; Susana Eyheramendy; H Erich Wichmann; Maris Laan; David P Strachan; Peter Sever; Denis Colm Shields; Alice Stanton; Peter Vollenweider; Alexander Teumer; Henry Völzke; Rainer Rettig; Christopher Newton-Cheh; Pankaj Arora; Feng Zhang; Nicole Soranzo; Timothy D Spector; Gavin Lucas; Sekar Kathiresan; David S Siscovick; Jian'an Luan; Ruth J F Loos; Nicholas J Wareham; Brenda W Penninx; Ilja M Nolte; Martin McBride; William H Miller; Stuart A Nicklin; Andrew H Baker; Delyth Graham; Robert A McDonald; Jill P Pell; Naveed Sattar; Paul Welsh; Patricia Munroe; Mark J Caulfield; Alberto Zanchetti; Anna F Dominiczak
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 5.917

5.  The interaction of endothelial nitric oxide synthase polymorphism and current smoking in terms of increased arterial stiffness.

Authors:  O Mayer; J Filipovský; M Pesta; R Cífková; M Dolejsová; J Simon
Journal:  Physiol Res       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 1.881

6.  Common single nucleotide polymorphisms in Japanese patients with essential hypertension: aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 gene as a risk factor independent of alcohol consumption.

Authors:  Peng Hui; Tomohiro Nakayama; Akihiko Morita; Naoyuki Sato; Mikano Hishiki; Kosuke Saito; Yukie Yoshikawa; Masaaki Tamura; Ichiro Sato; Teruyuki Takahashi; Masayoshi Soma; Yoichi Izumi; Yukio Ozawa; Zuheng Cheng
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.872

7.  Genome-wide association study of blood pressure and hypertension.

Authors:  Daniel Levy; Georg B Ehret; Kenneth Rice; Germaine C Verwoert; Lenore J Launer; Abbas Dehghan; Nicole L Glazer; Alanna C Morrison; Andrew D Johnson; Thor Aspelund; Yurii Aulchenko; Thomas Lumley; Anna Köttgen; Ramachandran S Vasan; Fernando Rivadeneira; Gudny Eiriksdottir; Xiuqing Guo; Dan E Arking; Gary F Mitchell; Francesco U S Mattace-Raso; Albert V Smith; Kent Taylor; Robert B Scharpf; Shih-Jen Hwang; Eric J G Sijbrands; Joshua Bis; Tamara B Harris; Santhi K Ganesh; Christopher J O'Donnell; Albert Hofman; Jerome I Rotter; Josef Coresh; Emelia J Benjamin; André G Uitterlinden; Gerardo Heiss; Caroline S Fox; Jacqueline C M Witteman; Eric Boerwinkle; Thomas J Wang; Vilmundur Gudnason; Martin G Larson; Aravinda Chakravarti; Bruce M Psaty; Cornelia M van Duijn
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2009-05-10       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  Association of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T polymorphism and serum lipid levels in the Guangxi Bai Ku Yao and Han populations.

Authors:  Lin Zhang; Rui-Xing Yin; Wan-Ying Liu; Lin Miao; Dong-Feng Wu; Lynn Htet Htet Aung; Xi-Jiang Hu; Xiao-Li Cao; Jin-Zhen Wu; Shang-Ling Pan
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.876

9.  Association of the LIPG 584C > T polymorphism and serum lipid levels in the Guangxi Bai Ku Yao and Han populations.

Authors:  Wan-Ying Liu; Rui-Xing Yin; Lin Zhang; Xiao-Li Cao; Lin Miao; Dong-Feng Wu; Lynn Htet Htet Aung; Xi-Jiang Hu; Wei-Xiong Lin; De-Zhai Yang
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 3.876

10.  Genome-wide association study identifies eight loci associated with blood pressure.

Authors:  Christopher Newton-Cheh; Toby Johnson; Vesela Gateva; Martin D Tobin; Murielle Bochud; Lachlan Coin; Samer S Najjar; Jing Hua Zhao; Simon C Heath; Susana Eyheramendy; Konstantinos Papadakis; Benjamin F Voight; Laura J Scott; Feng Zhang; Martin Farrall; Toshiko Tanaka; Chris Wallace; John C Chambers; Kay-Tee Khaw; Peter Nilsson; Pim van der Harst; Silvia Polidoro; Diederick E Grobbee; N Charlotte Onland-Moret; Michiel L Bots; Louise V Wain; Katherine S Elliott; Alexander Teumer; Jian'an Luan; Gavin Lucas; Johanna Kuusisto; Paul R Burton; David Hadley; Wendy L McArdle; Morris Brown; Anna Dominiczak; Stephen J Newhouse; Nilesh J Samani; John Webster; Eleftheria Zeggini; Jacques S Beckmann; Sven Bergmann; Noha Lim; Kijoung Song; Peter Vollenweider; Gerard Waeber; Dawn M Waterworth; Xin Yuan; Leif Groop; Marju Orho-Melander; Alessandra Allione; Alessandra Di Gregorio; Simonetta Guarrera; Salvatore Panico; Fulvio Ricceri; Valeria Romanazzi; Carlotta Sacerdote; Paolo Vineis; Inês Barroso; Manjinder S Sandhu; Robert N Luben; Gabriel J Crawford; Pekka Jousilahti; Markus Perola; Michael Boehnke; Lori L Bonnycastle; Francis S Collins; Anne U Jackson; Karen L Mohlke; Heather M Stringham; Timo T Valle; Cristen J Willer; Richard N Bergman; Mario A Morken; Angela Döring; Christian Gieger; Thomas Illig; Thomas Meitinger; Elin Org; Arne Pfeufer; H Erich Wichmann; Sekar Kathiresan; Jaume Marrugat; Christopher J O'Donnell; Stephen M Schwartz; David S Siscovick; Isaac Subirana; Nelson B Freimer; Anna-Liisa Hartikainen; Mark I McCarthy; Paul F O'Reilly; Leena Peltonen; Anneli Pouta; Paul E de Jong; Harold Snieder; Wiek H van Gilst; Robert Clarke; Anuj Goel; Anders Hamsten; John F Peden; Udo Seedorf; Ann-Christine Syvänen; Giovanni Tognoni; Edward G Lakatta; Serena Sanna; Paul Scheet; David Schlessinger; Angelo Scuteri; Marcus Dörr; Florian Ernst; Stephan B Felix; Georg Homuth; Roberto Lorbeer; Thorsten Reffelmann; Rainer Rettig; Uwe Völker; Pilar Galan; Ivo G Gut; Serge Hercberg; G Mark Lathrop; Diana Zelenika; Panos Deloukas; Nicole Soranzo; Frances M Williams; Guangju Zhai; Veikko Salomaa; Markku Laakso; Roberto Elosua; Nita G Forouhi; Henry Völzke; Cuno S Uiterwaal; Yvonne T van der Schouw; Mattijs E Numans; Giuseppe Matullo; Gerjan Navis; Göran Berglund; Sheila A Bingham; Jaspal S Kooner; John M Connell; Stefania Bandinelli; Luigi Ferrucci; Hugh Watkins; Tim D Spector; Jaakko Tuomilehto; David Altshuler; David P Strachan; Maris Laan; Pierre Meneton; Nicholas J Wareham; Manuela Uda; Marjo-Riitta Jarvelin; Vincent Mooser; Olle Melander; Ruth J F Loos; Paul Elliott; Gonçalo R Abecasis; Mark Caulfield; Patricia B Munroe
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2009-05-10       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  The biology behind the atherothrombotic effects of cigarette smoke.

Authors:  Adam Csordas; David Bernhard
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Effects of USF1 SNPs and SNP-Environment Interactions on Serum Lipid Profiles and the Risk of Early-Onset Coronary Artery Disease in the Chinese Population.

Authors:  Peng-Fei Zheng; Lu-Zhu Chen; Hong-Wei Pan; Peng Liu; Zhao-Fen Zheng
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-06-15

3.  Plasma PCSK9 level is unrelated to blood pressure and not associated independently with carotid intima-media thickness in hypertensives.

Authors:  Sheng-Hua Yang; Ying Du; Sha Li; Yan Zhang; Rui-Xia Xu; Cheng-Gang Zhu; Yuan-Lin Guo; Na-Qiong Wu; Qian Dong; Jing Sun; Jian-Jun Li
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 3.872

4.  Scavenger receptor class B type 1 gene rs5888 single nucleotide polymorphism and the risk of coronary artery disease and ischemic stroke: a case-control study.

Authors:  Dong-Feng Wu; Rui-Xing Yin; Xiao-Li Cao; Wu-Xian Chen; Lynn Htet Htet Aung; Wei Wang; Ke-Ke Huang; Ping Huang; Xiao-Na Zeng; Jian Wu
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 3.738

5.  Interactions of Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase C677T Polymorphism with Environmental Factors on Hypertension Susceptibility.

Authors:  Shujun Fan; Boyi Yang; Xueyuan Zhi; Yanxun Wang; Jian Wei; Quanmei Zheng; Guifan Sun
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Association between the TIMD4-HAVCR1 variants and serum lipid levels, coronary heart disease and ischemic stroke risk and atorvastatin lipid-lowering efficacy.

Authors:  Qing-Hui Zhang; Rui-Xing Yin; Wu-Xian Chen; Xiao-Li Cao; Yu-Ming Chen
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 3.840

7.  The effect of MVK-MMAB variants, their haplotypes and G×E interactions on serum lipid levels and the risk of coronary heart disease and ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Liu Miao; Rui-Xing Yin; Feng Huang; Wu-Xian Chen; Xiao-Li Cao; Jin-Zhen Wu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-08-18

8.  Several lipid-related gene polymorphisms interact with overweight/obesity to modulate blood pressure levels.

Authors:  Rui-Xing Yin; Dong-Feng Wu; Lynn Htet Htet Aung; Ting-Ting Yan; Xiao-Li Cao; Xing-Jiang Long; Lin Miao; Wan-Ying Liu; Lin Zhang; Meng Li
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 6.208

9.  MADD-FOLH1 Polymorphisms and Their Haplotypes with Serum Lipid Levels and the Risk of Coronary Heart Disease and Ischemic Stroke in a Chinese Han Population.

Authors:  Dong-Feng Wu; Rui-Xing Yin; Xiao-Li Cao; Feng Huang; Jin-Zhen Wu; Wu-Xian Chen
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 5.717

10.  HIV and Hepatitis C-Coinfected Patients Have Lower Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Despite Higher Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin Kexin 9 (PCSK9): An Apparent "PCSK9-Lipid Paradox".

Authors:  Payal Kohli; Peter Ganz; Yifei Ma; Rebecca Scherzer; Sophia Hur; Bernard Weigel; Carl Grunfeld; Steven Deeks; Scott Wasserman; Rob Scott; Priscilla Y Hsue
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.