Literature DB >> 21293129

Cervical or thoracic anastomosis after esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

S S A Y Biere1, K W Maas, M A Cuesta, D L van der Peet.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cervical anastomosis and thoracic anastomosis are used for gastric tube reconstruction after esophagectomy for cancer. This systematic review was conducted in order to identify randomized trials that compare cervical with thoracic anastomosis.
METHODS: A literature search for randomized trials was performed in the following databases: Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library.
RESULTS: A total of 4 trials were included. All studies had a small sample size and were of moderate quality. One trial was excluded from the meta-analysis. The following outcomes were significantly associated with a cervical anastomosis: recurrent laryngeal nerve trauma (OR: 7.14; 95% CI: 1.75-29.14; p = 0.006) and anastomotic leakage (OR: 3.43; 95% CI: 1.09-10.78; p = 0.03). None of the following outcomes were associated with the location of the anastomosis: pulmonary complications (OR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.13-5.59; p = 0.87), perioperative mortality (OR: 1.24; 95% CI: 0.35-4.41; p = 0.74), benign stricture formation (OR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.17-3.87; p = 0.79) or tumor recurrence (OR: 2.01; 95% CI: 0.68-5.91; p = 0.21).
CONCLUSION: Cervical anastomosis could be associated with a higher leak rate and recurrent nerve trauma. However, the currently available randomized evidence is limited. Further randomized trials are needed to provide sufficient evidence for the preferred location of the anastomosis after esophagectomy.
Copyright © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21293129     DOI: 10.1159/000322014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Surg        ISSN: 0253-4886            Impact factor:   2.588


  63 in total

1.  Clinical application of mucosal valve technique for anastomosis during esophagogastrostomy.

Authors:  Bin Li; Yu-Min Li; Jian-Hua Zhang; Yun-Feng Su; Cheng Wang; Zhi-Qiang Wang; Yun-Jiu Gou; Tie-Niu Song; Jian-Bao Yang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Emerging Trends in the Etiology, Prevention, and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Anastomotic Leakage.

Authors:  Sami A Chadi; Abe Fingerhut; Mariana Berho; Steven R DeMeester; James W Fleshman; Neil H Hyman; David A Margolin; Joseph E Martz; Elisabeth C McLemore; Daniela Molena; Martin I Newman; Janice F Rafferty; Bashar Safar; Anthony J Senagore; Oded Zmora; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  Gastric Preconditioning in Advance of Esophageal Resection-Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Patrick Heger; Susanne Blank; Markus K Diener; Alexis Ulrich; Thomas Schmidt; Markus W Büchler; André L Mihaljevic
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Tubular stomach or whole stomach for esophagectomy through cervico-thoraco-abdominal approach: a comparative clinical study on anastomotic leakage.

Authors:  Y-S Shu; C Sun; W-P Shi; H-C Shi; S-C Lu; K Wang
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2013-02-10       Impact factor: 1.568

5.  [Surgical treatment of esophageal cancer : Evolution of management and prognosis over the last 3 decades].

Authors:  T Glatz; G Marjanovic; K Zirlik; T Brunner; U T Hopt; F Makowiec; J Hoeppner
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 6.  [Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy. German version].

Authors:  R van Hillegersberg; M F J Seesing; H J F Brenkman; J P Ruurda
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 0.955

7.  Outcome, complications, and mortality of an intrathoracic anastomosis in esophageal cancer in patients without a preoperative selection with a risk score.

Authors:  Ingo Alldinger; Leila Sisic; Marcel Hochreiter; Wilko Weichert; Susanne Blank; Maria Burian; Lars Grenacher; Tom Bruckner; Jens Werner; Markus W Büchler; Katja Ott
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  McKeown or Ivor Lewis totally minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Frans van Workum; Gijs H Berkelmans; Bastiaan R Klarenbeek; Grard A P Nieuwenhuijzen; Misha D P Luyer; Camiel Rosman
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Ivor Lewis vs Mckeown esophagectomy: analysis of operative outcomes from the ACS NSQIP database.

Authors:  M J Sabra; Y A Alwatari; L G Wolfe; A Xu; B J Kaplan; A D Cassano; R D Shah
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-01-13

10.  Application of Oesophagogastric Cervical Mechanical Anastomosis in Oesophagectomy for Cancer.

Authors:  Zhong Chen; Ning Zhang; Xiao Chen
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 0.656

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.