Literature DB >> 21292640

Aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligands of widely different toxic equivalency factors induce similar histone marks in target gene chromatin.

Jerald L Ovesen1, Michael Schnekenburger, Alvaro Puga.   

Abstract

Posttranslational histone modifications are a critical regulatory mechanism of gene transcription. Previous studies from our laboratory have shown that contingent on binding to its cognate promoter motifs in the Cyp1a1 gene, activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) by benzo[a]pyrene (BaP) treatment induces histone modifications in the Cyp1a1 promoter that are required for activation of gene transcription. Here, we have studied different AHR ligands, including polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) of different toxic equivalency factors (TEF), to determine whether changes in histone modifications are linked to different levels of Cyp1a1 expression or dependent on AHR-ligand affinity. We find that all ligands lead to the same pattern of histone modifications in a relationship that parallels the strength of their AHR-ligand affinity. Thus, whereas PCB126 (TEF 0.1), 3-methylcholanthrene, β-naphthoflavone, and 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) initiate a pattern of histone marks similar to those induced by BaP, PCB77 (TEF 0.0001) causes a lower level of change in the same marks and requires a longer activation time than PCB126, BaP, or TCDD. In contrast, the non-dioxin-like PCB153 recruits AHR to the Cyp1a1 enhancer causing a displacement of enhancer-associated histone H3 but does not cause the other observed histone mark changes nor does it induce transcription. These results indicate that AHR recruitment to the promoter is not sufficient to induce the histone modifications needed to activate gene expression and show that there is a good correlation between the regulatory chromatin changes associated with ligand-induced AHR target gene transcription and the resultant toxicity of the ligand.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21292640      PMCID: PMC3080189          DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfr032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  36 in total

Review 1.  Translating the histone code.

Authors:  T Jenuwein; C D Allis
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-08-10       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Health effects of dioxin exposure: a 20-year mortality study.

Authors:  P A Bertazzi; D Consonni; S Bachetti; M Rubagotti; A Baccarelli; C Zocchetti; A C Pesatori
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Antagonism of aryl hydrocarbon receptor-dependent induction of CYP1A1 and inhibition of IgM expression by di-ortho-substituted polychlorinated biphenyls.

Authors:  Jaehong Suh; Jong Soon Kang; Kyu-Hwan Yang; Norbert E Kaminski
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2003-02-15       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 4.  The 2005 World Health Organization reevaluation of human and Mammalian toxic equivalency factors for dioxins and dioxin-like compounds.

Authors:  Martin Van den Berg; Linda S Birnbaum; Michael Denison; Mike De Vito; William Farland; Mark Feeley; Heidelore Fiedler; Helen Hakansson; Annika Hanberg; Laurie Haws; Martin Rose; Stephen Safe; Dieter Schrenk; Chiharu Tohyama; Angelika Tritscher; Jouko Tuomisto; Mats Tysklind; Nigel Walker; Richard E Peterson
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 5.  Induction of cytochrome P4501A1.

Authors:  J P Whitlock
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 13.820

6.  Cancer, heart disease, and diabetes in workers exposed to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin.

Authors:  K Steenland; L Piacitelli; J Deddens; M Fingerhut; L I Chang
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1999-05-05       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 7.  Role of the aromatic hydrocarbon receptor and [Ah] gene battery in the oxidative stress response, cell cycle control, and apoptosis.

Authors:  D W Nebert; A L Roe; M Z Dieter; W A Solis; Y Yang; T P Dalton
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 5.858

8.  Interactions between the aryl hydrocarbon receptor and P-TEFb. Sequential recruitment of transcription factors and differential phosphorylation of C-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II at cyp1a1 promoter.

Authors:  Yanan Tian; Sui Ke; Min Chen; Tao Sheng
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-08-12       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  HDAC1 bound to the Cyp1a1 promoter blocks histone acetylation associated with Ah receptor-mediated trans-activation.

Authors:  Michael Schnekenburger; Li Peng; Alvaro Puga
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2007-07-20

Review 10.  Ligand binding and activation of the Ah receptor.

Authors:  Michael S Denison; Alessandro Pandini; Scott R Nagy; Enoch P Baldwin; Laura Bonati
Journal:  Chem Biol Interact       Date:  2002-09-20       Impact factor: 5.192

View more
  23 in total

1.  Linking the aryl hydrocarbon receptor with altered DNA methylation patterns and developmentally induced aberrant antiviral CD8+ T cell responses.

Authors:  Bethany Winans; Anusha Nagari; Minho Chae; Christina M Post; Chia-I Ko; Alvaro Puga; W Lee Kraus; B Paige Lawrence
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 5.422

2.  Exposure to coplanar PCBs induces endothelial cell inflammation through epigenetic regulation of NF-κB subunit p65.

Authors:  Dandan Liu; Jordan T Perkins; Michael C Petriello; Bernhard Hennig
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 4.219

3.  Exercise protects against PCB-induced inflammation and associated cardiovascular risk factors.

Authors:  Margaret O Murphy; Michael C Petriello; Sung Gu Han; Manjula Sunkara; Andrew J Morris; Karyn Esser; Bernhard Hennig
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  In vitro profiling of toxic effects of prominent environmental lower-chlorinated PCB congeners linked with endocrine disruption and tumor promotion.

Authors:  Kateřina Pěnčíková; Lucie Svržková; Simona Strapáčová; Jiří Neča; Iveta Bartoňková; Zdeněk Dvořák; Martina Hýžďalová; Jakub Pivnička; Lenka Pálková; Hans-Joachim Lehmler; Xueshu Li; Jan Vondráček; Miroslav Machala
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 8.071

5.  Ah Receptor Pathway Intricacies; Signaling Through Diverse Protein Partners and DNA-Motifs.

Authors:  D P Jackson; A D Joshi; C J Elferink
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 3.524

Review 6.  Epigenetic alterations induced by genotoxic occupational and environmental human chemical carcinogens: A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Grace Chappell; Igor P Pogribny; Kathryn Z Guyton; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 5.657

7.  Pure non-dioxin-like PCB congeners suppress induction of AhR-dependent endpoints in rat liver cells.

Authors:  Petra Brenerová; Timo Hamers; Jorke H Kamstra; Jan Vondráček; Simona Strapáčová; Patrik L Andersson; Miroslav Machala
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Differential consequences of two distinct AhR ligands on innate and adaptive immune responses to influenza A virus.

Authors:  Jennifer L H Wheeler; Kyle C Martin; Emily Resseguie; B Paige Lawrence
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  The Ah receptor recruits IKKα to its target binding motifs to phosphorylate serine-10 in histone H3 required for transcriptional activation.

Authors:  Hisaka Kurita; Michael Schnekenburger; Jerald L Ovesen; Ying Xia; Alvaro Puga
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  The Promises of Quantitative Proteomics in Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Bhagwat Prasad; Marc Vrana; Aanchal Mehrotra; Katherine Johnson; Deepak Kumar Bhatt
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 3.534

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.