Literature DB >> 21291545

Nuclear receptors from the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi lack a zinc-finger DNA-binding domain: lineage-specific loss or ancestral condition in the emergence of the nuclear receptor superfamily?

Adam M Reitzel1, Kevin Pang, Joseph F Ryan, James C Mullikin, Mark Q Martindale, Andreas D Baxevanis, Ann M Tarrant.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nuclear receptors (NRs) are an ancient superfamily of metazoan transcription factors that play critical roles in regulation of reproduction, development, and energetic homeostasis. Although the evolutionary relationships among NRs are well-described in two prominent clades of animals (deuterostomes and protostomes), comparatively little information has been reported on the diversity of NRs in early diverging metazoans. Here, we identified NRs from the phylum Ctenophora and used a phylogenomic approach to explore the emergence of the NR superfamily in the animal kingdom. In addition, to gain insight into conserved or novel functions, we examined NR expression during ctenophore development.
RESULTS: We report the first described NRs from the phylum Ctenophora: two from Mnemiopsis leidyi and one from Pleurobrachia pileus. All ctenophore NRs contained a ligand-binding domain and grouped with NRs from the subfamily NR2A (HNF4). Surprisingly, all the ctenophore NRs lacked the highly conserved DNA-binding domain (DBD). NRs from Mnemiopsis were expressed in different regions of developing ctenophores. One was broadly expressed in the endoderm during gastrulation. The second was initially expressed in the ectoderm during gastrulation, in regions corresponding to the future tentacles; subsequent expression was restricted to the apical organ. Phylogenetic analyses of NRs from ctenophores, sponges, cnidarians, and a placozoan support the hypothesis that expansion of the superfamily occurred in a step-wise fashion, with initial radiations in NR family 2, followed by representatives of NR families 3, 6, and 1/4 originating prior to the appearance of the bilaterian ancestor.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides the first description of NRs from ctenophores, including the full complement from Mnemiopsis. Ctenophores have the least diverse NR complement of any animal phylum with representatives that cluster with only one subfamily (NR2A). Ctenophores and sponges have a similarly restricted NR complement supporting the hypothesis that the original NR was HNF4-like and that these lineages are the first two branches from the animal tree. The absence of a zinc-finger DNA-binding domain in the two ctenophore species suggests two hypotheses: this domain may have been secondarily lost within the ctenophore lineage or, if ctenophores are the first branch off the animal tree, the original NR may have lacked the canonical DBD. Phylogenomic analyses and categorization of NRs from all four early diverging animal phyla compared with the complement from bilaterians suggest the rate of NR diversification prior to the cnidarian-bilaterian split was relatively modest, with independent radiations of several NR subfamilies within the cnidarian lineage.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21291545      PMCID: PMC3038971          DOI: 10.1186/2041-9139-2-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evodevo        ISSN: 2041-9139            Impact factor:   2.250


  49 in total

1.  RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models.

Authors:  Alexandros Stamatakis
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life.

Authors:  Casey W Dunn; Andreas Hejnol; David Q Matus; Kevin Pang; William E Browne; Stephen A Smith; Elaine Seaver; Greg W Rouse; Matthias Obst; Gregory D Edgecombe; Martin V Sørensen; Steven H D Haddock; Andreas Schmidt-Rhaesa; Akiko Okusu; Reinhardt Møbjerg Kristensen; Ward C Wheeler; Mark Q Martindale; Gonzalo Giribet
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Evolution of the nuclear receptor superfamily: early diversification from an ancestral orphan receptor.

Authors:  V Laudet
Journal:  J Mol Endocrinol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 5.098

4.  The dynamic genome of Hydra.

Authors:  Jarrod A Chapman; Ewen F Kirkness; Oleg Simakov; Steven E Hampson; Therese Mitros; Thomas Weinmaier; Thomas Rattei; Prakash G Balasubramanian; Jon Borman; Dana Busam; Kathryn Disbennett; Cynthia Pfannkoch; Nadezhda Sumin; Granger G Sutton; Lakshmi Devi Viswanathan; Brian Walenz; David M Goodstein; Uffe Hellsten; Takeshi Kawashima; Simon E Prochnik; Nicholas H Putnam; Shengquiang Shu; Bruce Blumberg; Catherine E Dana; Lydia Gee; Dennis F Kibler; Lee Law; Dirk Lindgens; Daniel E Martinez; Jisong Peng; Philip A Wigge; Bianca Bertulat; Corina Guder; Yukio Nakamura; Suat Ozbek; Hiroshi Watanabe; Konstantin Khalturin; Georg Hemmrich; André Franke; René Augustin; Sebastian Fraune; Eisuke Hayakawa; Shiho Hayakawa; Mamiko Hirose; Jung Shan Hwang; Kazuho Ikeo; Chiemi Nishimiya-Fujisawa; Atshushi Ogura; Toshio Takahashi; Patrick R H Steinmetz; Xiaoming Zhang; Roland Aufschnaiter; Marie-Kristin Eder; Anne-Kathrin Gorny; Willi Salvenmoser; Alysha M Heimberg; Benjamin M Wheeler; Kevin J Peterson; Angelika Böttger; Patrick Tischler; Alexander Wolf; Takashi Gojobori; Karin A Remington; Robert L Strausberg; J Craig Venter; Ulrich Technau; Bert Hobmayer; Thomas C G Bosch; Thomas W Holstein; Toshitaka Fujisawa; Hans R Bode; Charles N David; Daniel S Rokhsar; Robert E Steele
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-03-14       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  The Octopus vulgaris estrogen receptor is a constitutive transcriptional activator: evolutionary and functional implications.

Authors:  June Keay; Jamie T Bridgham; Joseph W Thornton
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 4.736

6.  Improved phylogenomic taxon sampling noticeably affects nonbilaterian relationships.

Authors:  K S Pick; H Philippe; F Schreiber; D Erpenbeck; D J Jackson; P Wrede; M Wiens; A Alié; B Morgenstern; M Manuel; G Wörheide
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  The Trichoplax genome and the nature of placozoans.

Authors:  Mansi Srivastava; Emina Begovic; Jarrod Chapman; Nicholas H Putnam; Uffe Hellsten; Takeshi Kawashima; Alan Kuo; Therese Mitros; Asaf Salamov; Meredith L Carpenter; Ana Y Signorovitch; Maria A Moreno; Kai Kamm; Jane Grimwood; Jeremy Schmutz; Harris Shapiro; Igor V Grigoriev; Leo W Buss; Bernd Schierwater; Stephen L Dellaporta; Daniel S Rokhsar
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  The homeodomain complement of the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi suggests that Ctenophora and Porifera diverged prior to the ParaHoxozoa.

Authors:  Joseph F Ryan; Kevin Pang; James C Mullikin; Mark Q Martindale; Andreas D Baxevanis
Journal:  Evodevo       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 2.250

9.  Coordinated spatial and temporal expression of Hox genes during embryogenesis in the acoel Convolutriloba longifissura.

Authors:  Andreas Hejnol; Mark Q Martindale
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 7.431

10.  Sequencing and de novo analysis of a coral larval transcriptome using 454 GSFlx.

Authors:  Eli Meyer; Galina V Aglyamova; Shi Wang; Jade Buchanan-Carter; David Abrego; John K Colbourne; Bette L Willis; Mikhail V Matz
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  16 in total

1.  Evolution of sodium channels and the new view of early nervous system evolution.

Authors:  Benjamin J Liebeskind
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2011-11-01

Review 2.  Phylogenetic evidence for the modular evolution of metazoan signalling pathways.

Authors:  Leslie S Babonis; Mark Q Martindale
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Extreme mitochondrial evolution in the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi: Insight from mtDNA and the nuclear genome.

Authors:  Walker Pett; Joseph F Ryan; Kevin Pang; James C Mullikin; Mark Q Martindale; Andreas D Baxevanis; Dennis V Lavrov
Journal:  Mitochondrial DNA       Date:  2011-10-10

Review 4.  Conservation of DNA and ligand binding properties of retinoid X receptor from the placozoan Trichoplax adhaerens to human.

Authors:  Adam M Reitzel; Jason Macrander; Daniel Mane-Padros; Bin Fang; Frances M Sladek; Ann M Tarrant
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2018-03-03       Impact factor: 4.292

5.  The genome of the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi and its implications for cell type evolution.

Authors:  Joseph F Ryan; Kevin Pang; Christine E Schnitzler; Anh-Dao Nguyen; R Travis Moreland; David K Simmons; Bernard J Koch; Warren R Francis; Paul Havlak; Stephen A Smith; Nicholas H Putnam; Steven H D Haddock; Casey W Dunn; Tyra G Wolfsberg; James C Mullikin; Mark Q Martindale; Andreas D Baxevanis
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  Circadian clocks in the cnidaria: environmental entrainment, molecular regulation, and organismal outputs.

Authors:  Adam M Reitzel; Ann M Tarrant; Oren Levy
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 3.326

Review 7.  Multigenerational laboratory culture of pelagic ctenophores and CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing in the lobate Mnemiopsis leidyi.

Authors:  J S Presnell; W E Browne; M Bubel; T Knowles; W Patry
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 17.021

8.  Lim homeobox genes in the Ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi: the evolution of neural cell type specification.

Authors:  David K Simmons; Kevin Pang; Mark Q Martindale
Journal:  Evodevo       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 2.250

Review 9.  Function and Evolution of Nuclear Receptors in Environmental-Dependent Postembryonic Development.

Authors:  Jan Taubenheim; Constantin Kortmann; Sebastian Fraune
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-06-10

10.  MicroRNAs and essential components of the microRNA processing machinery are not encoded in the genome of the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi.

Authors:  Evan K Maxwell; Joseph F Ryan; Christine E Schnitzler; William E Browne; Andreas D Baxevanis
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.