BACKGROUND: Nuclear receptors (NRs) are an ancient superfamily of metazoan transcription factors that play critical roles in regulation of reproduction, development, and energetic homeostasis. Although the evolutionary relationships among NRs are well-described in two prominent clades of animals (deuterostomes and protostomes), comparatively little information has been reported on the diversity of NRs in early diverging metazoans. Here, we identified NRs from the phylum Ctenophora and used a phylogenomic approach to explore the emergence of the NR superfamily in the animal kingdom. In addition, to gain insight into conserved or novel functions, we examined NR expression during ctenophore development. RESULTS: We report the first described NRs from the phylum Ctenophora: two from Mnemiopsis leidyi and one from Pleurobrachia pileus. All ctenophore NRs contained a ligand-binding domain and grouped with NRs from the subfamily NR2A (HNF4). Surprisingly, all the ctenophore NRs lacked the highly conserved DNA-binding domain (DBD). NRs from Mnemiopsis were expressed in different regions of developing ctenophores. One was broadly expressed in the endoderm during gastrulation. The second was initially expressed in the ectoderm during gastrulation, in regions corresponding to the future tentacles; subsequent expression was restricted to the apical organ. Phylogenetic analyses of NRs from ctenophores, sponges, cnidarians, and a placozoan support the hypothesis that expansion of the superfamily occurred in a step-wise fashion, with initial radiations in NR family 2, followed by representatives of NR families 3, 6, and 1/4 originating prior to the appearance of the bilaterian ancestor. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides the first description of NRs from ctenophores, including the full complement from Mnemiopsis. Ctenophores have the least diverse NR complement of any animal phylum with representatives that cluster with only one subfamily (NR2A). Ctenophores and sponges have a similarly restricted NR complement supporting the hypothesis that the original NR was HNF4-like and that these lineages are the first two branches from the animal tree. The absence of a zinc-finger DNA-binding domain in the two ctenophore species suggests two hypotheses: this domain may have been secondarily lost within the ctenophore lineage or, if ctenophores are the first branch off the animal tree, the original NR may have lacked the canonical DBD. Phylogenomic analyses and categorization of NRs from all four early diverging animal phyla compared with the complement from bilaterians suggest the rate of NR diversification prior to the cnidarian-bilaterian split was relatively modest, with independent radiations of several NR subfamilies within the cnidarian lineage.
BACKGROUND: Nuclear receptors (NRs) are an ancient superfamily of metazoan transcription factors that play critical roles in regulation of reproduction, development, and energetic homeostasis. Although the evolutionary relationships among NRs are well-described in two prominent clades of animals (deuterostomes and protostomes), comparatively little information has been reported on the diversity of NRs in early diverging metazoans. Here, we identified NRs from the phylum Ctenophora and used a phylogenomic approach to explore the emergence of the NR superfamily in the animal kingdom. In addition, to gain insight into conserved or novel functions, we examined NR expression during ctenophore development. RESULTS: We report the first described NRs from the phylum Ctenophora: two from Mnemiopsis leidyi and one from Pleurobrachia pileus. All ctenophore NRs contained a ligand-binding domain and grouped with NRs from the subfamily NR2A (HNF4). Surprisingly, all the ctenophore NRs lacked the highly conserved DNA-binding domain (DBD). NRs from Mnemiopsis were expressed in different regions of developing ctenophores. One was broadly expressed in the endoderm during gastrulation. The second was initially expressed in the ectoderm during gastrulation, in regions corresponding to the future tentacles; subsequent expression was restricted to the apical organ. Phylogenetic analyses of NRs from ctenophores, sponges, cnidarians, and a placozoan support the hypothesis that expansion of the superfamily occurred in a step-wise fashion, with initial radiations in NR family 2, followed by representatives of NR families 3, 6, and 1/4 originating prior to the appearance of the bilaterian ancestor. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides the first description of NRs from ctenophores, including the full complement from Mnemiopsis. Ctenophores have the least diverse NR complement of any animal phylum with representatives that cluster with only one subfamily (NR2A). Ctenophores and sponges have a similarly restricted NR complement supporting the hypothesis that the original NR was HNF4-like and that these lineages are the first two branches from the animal tree. The absence of a zinc-finger DNA-binding domain in the two ctenophore species suggests two hypotheses: this domain may have been secondarily lost within the ctenophore lineage or, if ctenophores are the first branch off the animal tree, the original NR may have lacked the canonical DBD. Phylogenomic analyses and categorization of NRs from all four early diverging animal phyla compared with the complement from bilaterians suggest the rate of NR diversification prior to the cnidarian-bilaterian split was relatively modest, with independent radiations of several NR subfamilies within the cnidarian lineage.
Authors: Casey W Dunn; Andreas Hejnol; David Q Matus; Kevin Pang; William E Browne; Stephen A Smith; Elaine Seaver; Greg W Rouse; Matthias Obst; Gregory D Edgecombe; Martin V Sørensen; Steven H D Haddock; Andreas Schmidt-Rhaesa; Akiko Okusu; Reinhardt Møbjerg Kristensen; Ward C Wheeler; Mark Q Martindale; Gonzalo Giribet Journal: Nature Date: 2008-03-05 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Jarrod A Chapman; Ewen F Kirkness; Oleg Simakov; Steven E Hampson; Therese Mitros; Thomas Weinmaier; Thomas Rattei; Prakash G Balasubramanian; Jon Borman; Dana Busam; Kathryn Disbennett; Cynthia Pfannkoch; Nadezhda Sumin; Granger G Sutton; Lakshmi Devi Viswanathan; Brian Walenz; David M Goodstein; Uffe Hellsten; Takeshi Kawashima; Simon E Prochnik; Nicholas H Putnam; Shengquiang Shu; Bruce Blumberg; Catherine E Dana; Lydia Gee; Dennis F Kibler; Lee Law; Dirk Lindgens; Daniel E Martinez; Jisong Peng; Philip A Wigge; Bianca Bertulat; Corina Guder; Yukio Nakamura; Suat Ozbek; Hiroshi Watanabe; Konstantin Khalturin; Georg Hemmrich; André Franke; René Augustin; Sebastian Fraune; Eisuke Hayakawa; Shiho Hayakawa; Mamiko Hirose; Jung Shan Hwang; Kazuho Ikeo; Chiemi Nishimiya-Fujisawa; Atshushi Ogura; Toshio Takahashi; Patrick R H Steinmetz; Xiaoming Zhang; Roland Aufschnaiter; Marie-Kristin Eder; Anne-Kathrin Gorny; Willi Salvenmoser; Alysha M Heimberg; Benjamin M Wheeler; Kevin J Peterson; Angelika Böttger; Patrick Tischler; Alexander Wolf; Takashi Gojobori; Karin A Remington; Robert L Strausberg; J Craig Venter; Ulrich Technau; Bert Hobmayer; Thomas C G Bosch; Thomas W Holstein; Toshitaka Fujisawa; Hans R Bode; Charles N David; Daniel S Rokhsar; Robert E Steele Journal: Nature Date: 2010-03-14 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: K S Pick; H Philippe; F Schreiber; D Erpenbeck; D J Jackson; P Wrede; M Wiens; A Alié; B Morgenstern; M Manuel; G Wörheide Journal: Mol Biol Evol Date: 2010-04-08 Impact factor: 16.240
Authors: Mansi Srivastava; Emina Begovic; Jarrod Chapman; Nicholas H Putnam; Uffe Hellsten; Takeshi Kawashima; Alan Kuo; Therese Mitros; Asaf Salamov; Meredith L Carpenter; Ana Y Signorovitch; Maria A Moreno; Kai Kamm; Jane Grimwood; Jeremy Schmutz; Harris Shapiro; Igor V Grigoriev; Leo W Buss; Bernd Schierwater; Stephen L Dellaporta; Daniel S Rokhsar Journal: Nature Date: 2008-08-21 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Eli Meyer; Galina V Aglyamova; Shi Wang; Jade Buchanan-Carter; David Abrego; John K Colbourne; Bette L Willis; Mikhail V Matz Journal: BMC Genomics Date: 2009-05-12 Impact factor: 3.969
Authors: Walker Pett; Joseph F Ryan; Kevin Pang; James C Mullikin; Mark Q Martindale; Andreas D Baxevanis; Dennis V Lavrov Journal: Mitochondrial DNA Date: 2011-10-10
Authors: Adam M Reitzel; Jason Macrander; Daniel Mane-Padros; Bin Fang; Frances M Sladek; Ann M Tarrant Journal: J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol Date: 2018-03-03 Impact factor: 4.292
Authors: Joseph F Ryan; Kevin Pang; Christine E Schnitzler; Anh-Dao Nguyen; R Travis Moreland; David K Simmons; Bernard J Koch; Warren R Francis; Paul Havlak; Stephen A Smith; Nicholas H Putnam; Steven H D Haddock; Casey W Dunn; Tyra G Wolfsberg; James C Mullikin; Mark Q Martindale; Andreas D Baxevanis Journal: Science Date: 2013-12-13 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Evan K Maxwell; Joseph F Ryan; Christine E Schnitzler; William E Browne; Andreas D Baxevanis Journal: BMC Genomics Date: 2012-12-20 Impact factor: 3.969