Literature DB >> 21289180

Auditory cortex encodes the perceptual interpretation of ambiguous sound.

Niclas Kilian-Hütten1, Giancarlo Valente, Jean Vroomen, Elia Formisano.   

Abstract

The confounding of physical stimulus characteristics and perceptual interpretations of stimuli poses a problem for most neuroscientific studies of perception. In the auditory domain, this pertains to the entanglement of acoustics and percept. Traditionally, most study designs have relied on cognitive subtraction logic, which demands the use of one or more comparisons between stimulus types. This does not allow for a differentiation between effects due to acoustic differences (i.e., sensation) and those due to conscious perception. To overcome this problem, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in humans and pattern-recognition analysis to identify activation patterns that encode the perceptual interpretation of physically identical, ambiguous sounds. We show that it is possible to retrieve the perceptual interpretation of ambiguous phonemes-information that is fully subjective to the listener-from fMRI measurements of brain activity in auditory areas in the superior temporal cortex, most prominently on the posterior bank of the left Heschl's gyrus and sulcus and in the adjoining left planum temporale. These findings suggest that, beyond the basic acoustic analysis of sounds, constructive perceptual processes take place in these relatively early cortical auditory networks. This disagrees with hierarchical models of auditory processing, which generally conceive of these areas as sets of feature detectors, whose task is restricted to the analysis of physical characteristics and the structure of sounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21289180      PMCID: PMC6623724          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4572-10.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  42 in total

1.  Task-dependent activations of human auditory cortex to prototypical and nonprototypical vowels.

Authors:  Kirsi Harinen; Olli Aaltonen; Emma Salo; Oili Salonen; Teemu Rinne
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  Variability of perceptual multistability: from brain state to individual trait.

Authors:  Andreas Kleinschmidt; Philipp Sterzer; Geraint Rees
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  A review and synthesis of the first 20 years of PET and fMRI studies of heard speech, spoken language and reading.

Authors:  Cathy J Price
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Neural dynamics of phonological processing in the dorsal auditory stream.

Authors:  Einat Liebenthal; Merav Sabri; Scott A Beardsley; Jain Mangalathu-Arumana; Anjali Desai
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Auditory motion processing after early blindness.

Authors:  Fang Jiang; G Christopher Stecker; Ione Fine
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Lexical Information Guides Retuning of Neural Patterns in Perceptual Learning for Speech.

Authors:  Sahil Luthra; João M Correia; Dave F Kleinschmidt; Laura Mesite; Emily B Myers
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Representations of Invariant Musical Categories Are Decodable by Pattern Analysis of Locally Distributed BOLD Responses in Superior Temporal and Intraparietal Sulci.

Authors:  Mike E Klein; Robert J Zatorre
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 8.  The what, where and how of auditory-object perception.

Authors:  Jennifer K Bizley; Yale E Cohen
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 34.870

9.  Hierarchical Encoding of Attended Auditory Objects in Multi-talker Speech Perception.

Authors:  James O'Sullivan; Jose Herrero; Elliot Smith; Catherine Schevon; Guy M McKhann; Sameer A Sheth; Ashesh D Mehta; Nima Mesgarani
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Temporal cortex reflects effects of sentence context on phonetic processing.

Authors:  Sara Guediche; Caden Salvata; Sheila E Blumstein
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.