Literature DB >> 21289167

Micro-opioid receptor activation in the basolateral amygdala mediates the learning of increases but not decreases in the incentive value of a food reward.

Kate M Wassum1, Ingrid C Cely, Bernard W Balleine, Nigel T Maidment.   

Abstract

The decision to perform, or not perform, actions known to lead to a rewarding outcome is strongly influenced by the current incentive value of the reward. Incentive value is largely determined by the affective experience derived during previous consumption of the reward-the process of incentive learning. We trained rats on a two-lever, seeking-taking chain paradigm for sucrose reward, in which responding on the initial seeking lever of the chain was demonstrably controlled by the incentive value of the reward. We found that infusion of the μ-opioid receptor antagonist, CTOP (d-Phe-Cys-Tyr-d-Trp-Orn-Thr-Pen-Thr-NH(2)), into the basolateral amygdala (BLA) during posttraining, noncontingent consumption of sucrose in a novel elevated-hunger state (a positive incentive learning opportunity) blocked the encoding of incentive value information normally used to increase subsequent sucrose-seeking responses. Similar treatment with δ [N, N-diallyl-Tyr-Aib-Aib-Phe-Leu-OH (ICI 174,864)] or κ [5'-guanidinonaltrindole (GNTI)] antagonists was without effect. Interestingly, none of these drugs affected the ability of the rats to encode a decrease in incentive value resulting from experiencing the sucrose in a novel reduced-hunger state. However, the μ agonist, DAMGO ([d-Ala2, NMe-Phe4, Gly5-ol]-enkephalin), appeared to attenuate this negative incentive learning. These data suggest that upshifts and downshifts in endogenous opioid transmission in the BLA mediate the encoding of positive and negative shifts in incentive value, respectively, through actions at μ-opioid receptors, and provide insight into a mechanism through which opiates may elicit inappropriate desire resulting in their continued intake in the face of diminishing affective experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21289167      PMCID: PMC3081716          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3102-10.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  40 in total

1.  Consolidation and reconsolidation of incentive learning in the amygdala.

Authors:  Szu-Han Wang; Sean B Ostlund; Karim Nader; Bernard W Balleine
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-01-26       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Instrumental performance following a shift in primary motivation depends on incentive learning.

Authors:  B Balleine
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1992-07

Review 3.  Goal-directed instrumental action: contingency and incentive learning and their cortical substrates.

Authors:  B W Balleine; A Dickinson
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  1998 Apr-May       Impact factor: 5.250

4.  Immunohistochemical localization of mu-opioid receptors in the central nervous system of the rat.

Authors:  Y Q Ding; T Kaneko; S Nomura; N Mizuno
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1996-04-08       Impact factor: 3.215

5.  The effect of repeated administration of morphine, cocaine and ethanol on mu and delta opioid receptor density in the nucleus accumbens and striatum of the rat.

Authors:  J Turchan; B Przewłocka; G Toth; W Lasoń; A Borsodi; R Przewłocki
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 6.  The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction.

Authors:  T E Robinson; K C Berridge
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  1993 Sep-Dec

7.  Repeated cocaine administration upregulates kappa and mu, but not delta, opioid receptors.

Authors:  E M Unterwald; J M Rubenfeld; M J Kreek
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1994-08-15       Impact factor: 1.837

8.  Mu, delta, and kappa opioid receptor mRNA expression in the rat CNS: an in situ hybridization study.

Authors:  A Mansour; C A Fox; S Burke; F Meng; R C Thompson; H Akil; S J Watson
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1994-12-15       Impact factor: 3.215

Review 9.  Cannabinoids and reward: interactions with the opioid system.

Authors:  Liana Fattore; Gregorio Cossu; Maria S Spano; Serena Deiana; Paola Fadda; Maria Scherma; Walter Fratta
Journal:  Crit Rev Neurobiol       Date:  2004

10.  Effects of repeated psychostimulant administration on the prodynorphin system activity and kappa opioid receptor density in the rat brain.

Authors:  J Turchan; B Przewłocka; W Lasoń; R Przewłocki
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.590

View more
  33 in total

1.  What and when to "want"? Amygdala-based focusing of incentive salience upon sugar and sex.

Authors:  Stephen V Mahler; Kent C Berridge
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  μ- and δ-opioid-related processes in the accumbens core and shell differentially mediate the influence of reward-guided and stimulus-guided decisions on choice.

Authors:  Vincent Laurent; Beatrice Leung; Nigel Maidment; Bernard W Balleine
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Motivational Processes Underlying Substance Abuse Disorder.

Authors:  Paul J Meyer; Christopher P King; Carrie R Ferrario
Journal:  Curr Top Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016

Review 4.  The Origins and Organization of Vertebrate Pavlovian Conditioning.

Authors:  Michael S Fanselow; Kate M Wassum
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 10.005

5.  Optogenetic excitation of central amygdala amplifies and narrows incentive motivation to pursue one reward above another.

Authors:  Mike J F Robinson; Shelley M Warlow; Kent C Berridge
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Basolateral Amygdala to Orbitofrontal Cortex Projections Enable Cue-Triggered Reward Expectations.

Authors:  Nina T Lichtenberg; Zachary T Pennington; Sandra M Holley; Venuz Y Greenfield; Carlos Cepeda; Michael S Levine; Kate M Wassum
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Amygdala central nucleus interacts with dorsolateral striatum to regulate the acquisition of habits.

Authors:  Nura W Lingawi; Bernard W Balleine
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Dissociable contributions of anterior cingulate cortex and basolateral amygdala on a rodent cost/benefit decision-making task of cognitive effort.

Authors:  Jay G Hosking; Paul J Cocker; Catharine A Winstanley
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 9.  The role of opioid processes in reward and decision-making.

Authors:  Vincent Laurent; Ashleigh K Morse; Bernard W Balleine
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 10.  The multiple facets of opioid receptor function: implications for addiction.

Authors:  Pierre-Eric Lutz; Brigitte L Kieffer
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 6.627

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.