Literature DB >> 21288522

The effect of valgus braces on medial compartment load of the knee joint - in vivo load measurements in three subjects.

Ines Kutzner1, Steffen Küther, Bernd Heinlein, Jörn Dymke, Alwina Bender, Andreas M Halder, Georg Bergmann.   

Abstract

Knee osteoarthritis occurs predominately at the medial compartment. To unload the affected compartment, valgus braces are used which induce an additional valgus moment in order to shift the load more laterally. Until now the biomechanical effect of braces was mainly evaluated by measuring changes in external knee adduction moments. The aim of this study was to investigate if and to which extent the medial compartment load is reduced in vivo when wearing valgus braces. Six components of joint contact load were measured in vivo in three subjects, using instrumented, telemeterized knee implants. From the forces and moments the medio-lateral force distribution was calculated. Two braces, MOS Genu (Bauerfeind AG) and Genu Arthro (Otto Bock) were investigated in neutral, 4° and 8° valgus adjustment during walking, stair ascending and descending. During walking with the MOS brace in 4°/8° valgus adjustment, medial forces were reduced by 24%/30% on average at terminal stance. During walking with the GA in the 8° valgus position, medial forces were reduced by only 7%. During stair ascending/descending significant reductions of 26%/24% were only observed with the MOS (8°). The load reducing ability of the two investigated valgus braces was confirmed in three subjects. However, the load reduction depends on the brace stiffness and its valgus adjustment and varies strongly inter-individually. Valgus adjustments of 8° might, especially with the MOS brace, not be tolerated by patients for a long time. Medial load reductions of more than 25% can therefore probably not be expected in clinical practise.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21288522     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.01.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  20 in total

1.  Grand challenge competition to predict in vivo knee loads.

Authors:  Benjamin J Fregly; Thor F Besier; David G Lloyd; Scott L Delp; Scott A Banks; Marcus G Pandy; Darryl D D'Lima
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Loading conditions of the knee: what does it mean?

Authors:  Roland Becker; Sebastian Kopf; Jon Karlsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Gait modification to treat knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Benjamin J Fregly
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2011-12-28

4.  What predicts the first peak of the knee adduction moment?

Authors:  Anne Schmitz; Brian Noehren
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 5.  Current state of unloading braces for knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  J Richard Steadman; Karen K Briggs; Shannon M Pomeroy; Coen A Wijdicks
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  The effect of articular geometry features identified using statistical shape modelling on knee biomechanics.

Authors:  Allison L Clouthier; Colin R Smith; Michael F Vignos; Darryl G Thelen; Kevin J Deluzio; Michael J Rainbow
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 2.242

7.  [Conservative therapy of osteoarthritis].

Authors:  P Diehl; L Gerdesmeyer; J Schauwecker; P C Kreuz; H Gollwitzer; T Tischer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Are external knee load and EMG measures accurate indicators of internal knee contact forces during gait?

Authors:  Andrew J Meyer; Darryl D D'Lima; Thor F Besier; David G Lloyd; Clifford W Colwell; Benjamin J Fregly
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  Does an unloader brace reduce knee loading in normally aligned knees?

Authors:  Jay R Ebert; Karen Hambly; Brendan Joss; Timothy R Ackland; Cyril J Donnelly
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  Implantable sensor technology: measuring bone and joint biomechanics of daily life in vivo.

Authors:  Darryl D D'Lima; Benjamin J Fregly; Clifford W Colwell
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 5.156

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.