Literature DB >> 21288208

Chloroprocaine for spinal anesthesia: a retrospective analysis.

M R Hejtmanek1, J E Pollock.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent volunteer and clinical studies of chloroprocaine (CP) have evaluated its use for outpatient spinal anesthesia. This retrospective review describes the discharge characteristics and reported side effects of spinal CP in a large number of patients undergoing outpatient procedures.
METHODS: All patients who received spinal anesthesia for ambulatory procedures over a 20-month period were accessed using computer-generated reports. Charts from 601 anesthetics were analyzed for spinal drug used, block characteristics, side effects and discharge data.
RESULTS: CP was the most frequently used spinal anesthetic (84% of cases, n=503) for outpatient procedures. CP (median dose 40 mg, range 20-60 mg) times from injection to ambulation and discharge were 107±24 and 171±45 min, respectively. Lidocaine (median dose 60 mg, range 30-100 mg, n=84) times from injection to ambulation and discharge were 155±40 and 224±57 min, respectively (P<0.05). The incidence of urinary retention, the most common side effect, was similar in both groups. There were no reports of transient neurologic symptoms.
CONCLUSIONS: For ambulatory patients at our institution, the time to achievement of discharge criteria was significantly reduced with CP 40 vs. lidocaine 60 mg. There have been no reports of perioperative neurologic injury with the introduction of CP as a spinal anesthetic at our institution.
© 2011 The Authors. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. © 2011 The Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21288208     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2010.02371.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand        ISSN: 0001-5172            Impact factor:   2.105


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of spinal anaesthesia with isobaric chloroprocaine and general anaesthesia for short duration ambulatory urological procedures.

Authors:  Siddarth Ravi; Handattu M Krishna
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2022-02-10

2.  Comparison of analgesic efficacy of intrathecal 1% 2-chloroprocaine with or without fentanyl in elective caesarean section: A prospective, double-blind, randomised study.

Authors:  Geeta Singariya; Kusum Choudhary; Manoj Kamal; Pooja Bihani; Himani Pahuja; Pradeep Saini
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2021-02-10

3.  A Comparative Study of Isobaric 1% Chloroprocaine With 0.5% Isobaric Bupivacaine for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy Under Spinal Anaesthesia: A Prospective Randomised Study.

Authors:  Sugumar M; Atul K Singh; Amrita Rath; Abhinay Jayanthi
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-04-30

4.  Chloroprocaine Provides Safe, Effective, Short-Acting Spinal Anesthesia Ideal for Ambulatory Surgeries: A Retrospective Review.

Authors:  David H Kim; Richard Kahn; Andrew Lee; Phuong Dinh Mac; Yu-Fen Chiu; Jacques Yadeau; Jiabin Liu
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2019-08-26

5.  A Study to Evaluate Intrathecal 1% Chloroprocaine and 0.5% Levobupivacaine in Perianal Surgeries: A Prospective Randomized Study.

Authors:  B Bhaskara; S Shruthi; R Ramachandraiah
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2021-03-22

6.  Spinal anaesthesia with Chloroprocaine HCl 1% for elective lower limb procedures of short duration: a prospective, randomised, observer-blind study in adult patients.

Authors:  Daniela Ghisi; Giorgia Boschetto; Alessandra Maria Spinelli; Sandra Giannone; Jacopo Frugiuele; Marcello Ciccarello; Stefano Bonarelli
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 2.217

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.