Literature DB >> 21288161

A contemporary review of stereotactic radiotherapy: inherent dosimetric complexities and the potential for detriment.

Michael L Taylor1, Tomas Kron, Rick D Franich.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The advantages of highly localised, conformal treatments achievable with stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) are increasingly being extended to extracranial sites as stereotactic body radiotherapy with advancements in imaging and beam collimation. One of the challenges in stereotactic treatment lies in the significant complexities associated with small field dosimetry and dose calculation. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the complexities associated with stereotactic radiotherapy and the potential for detriment.
METHODS: This study is based on a comprehensive review of literature accessible via PubMed and other sources, covering stereotactic radiotherapy, small-field dosimetry and dose calculation.
FINDINGS: Several key issues were identified in the literature. They pertain to dose prescription, dose measurement and dose calculation within and beyond the treatment field. Field-edge regions and penumbrae occupy a significant portion of the total field size. Spectral and dosimetric characteristics are difficult to determine and are compounded by effects of tissue inhomogeneity. Measurement of small-fields is made difficult by detector volume averaging and energy response. Available dosimeters are compared, and emphasis is given to gel dosimetry which offers the greatest potential for three-dimensional small-field dosimetry. The limitations of treatment planning system algorithms as applied to small-fields (particularly in the presence of heterogeneities) is explained, and a review of Monte Carlo dose calculation is provided, including simplified treatment planning implementations. Not incorporated into treatment planning, there is evidence that far from the primary field, doses to patients (and corresponding risks of radiocarcinogenesis) from leakage/scatter in SRT are similar to large fields.
CONCLUSIONS: Improved knowledge of dosimetric issues is essential to the accurate measurement and calculation of dose as well as the interpretation and assessment of planned and delivered treatments. This review highlights such issues and the potential benefit that may be gained from Monte Carlo dose calculation and verification via three-dimensional dosimetric methods (such as gel dosimetry) being introduced into routine clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21288161     DOI: 10.3109/0284186X.2010.551665

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  9 in total

1.  Adaptation and validation of a commercial head phantom for cranial radiosurgery dosimetry end-to-end audit.

Authors:  Alexis Dimitriadis; Antony L Palmer; Russell A S Thomas; Andrew Nisbet; Catharine H Clark
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Simultaneous integrated protection : A new concept for high-precision radiation therapy.

Authors:  Thomas B Brunner; Ursula Nestle; Sonja Adebahr; Eleni Gkika; Rolf Wiehle; Dimos Baltas; Anca-Ligia Grosu
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  The influence of field size on stopping-power ratios in- and out-of-field: quantitative data for the BrainLAB m3 micro-multileaf collimator.

Authors:  Michael Taylor; Tanya Kairn; Tomas Kron; Leon Dunn; Peter N Johnston; Rick D Franich
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Performance of dose calculation algorithms from three generations in lung SBRT: comparison with full Monte Carlo-based dose distributions.

Authors:  Jarkko J Ojala; Mika K Kapanen; Simo J Hyödynmaa; Tuija K Wigren; Maunu A Pitkänen
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Evaluation of the IAEA-TRS 483 protocol for the dosimetry of small fields (square and stereotactic cones) using multiple detectors.

Authors:  Clare L Smith; Atousa Montesari; Christopher P Oliver; Duncan J Butler
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Influence of Clinical and Tumor Factors on Interfraction Setup Errors With Rotation Correction for Vacuum Cushion in Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Hua Chen; Lingxiang Liu; Hao Wang; Yan Shao; Hengle Gu; Yanhua Duan; Aihui Feng; Ying Huang; Zhiyong Xu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Evaluation of dosimetric misrepresentations from 3D conventional planning of liver SBRT using 4D deformable dose integration.

Authors:  Unjin A Yeo; Michael L Taylor; Jeremy R Supple; Shankar Siva; Tomas Kron; Daniel Pham; Rick D Franich
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Commissioning of a PTW 34070 large-area plane-parallel ionization chamber for small field megavoltage photon dosimetry.

Authors:  Tom Kupfer; Joerg Lehmann; Duncan J Butler; Ganesan Ramanathan; Tracy E Bailey; Rick D Franich
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  CyberKnife® fixed cone and Iris™ defined small radiation fields: Assessment with a high-resolution solid-state detector array.

Authors:  Giordano Biasi; Marco Petasecca; Susanna Guatelli; Ebert A Martin; Garry Grogan; Benjamin Hug; Jonathan Lane; Vladimir Perevertaylo; Tomas Kron; Anatoly B Rosenfeld
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 2.102

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.