Literature DB >> 21287905

Perceptions of health care communication: examining the role of patients' psychological distress.

Jiali Ye1, Ruth Shim.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to gain a better understanding of the relationship between patients' serious psychological distress (SPD) and their perception of interactions with health care providers and their ratings of the health care quality.
METHODS: We analyzed data from 6286 adult respondents to the 2007 Health Information National Trends Survey. We conducted cross-tabulations to compare sociodemographic characteristics between those with SPD and those without SPD. Using odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals from logistic regression models, we assessed the association between psychological status and indicators of perceived health care communication and the overall health care quality after controlling for sociodemographic variables.
RESULTS: Patients with SPD were less likely to report that their provider "always" paid attention to their feelings and emotions, "always" ensured their understanding of the needed care, and "always" assisted them dealing with uncertain feelings. These distressed patients were also less satisfied with the overall health care quality.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients' psychological distress is negatively associated with their perceived quality of communication with health providers. Further knowledge on the health care need of patients with SPD would be important in improving health service delivery and optimizing the psychological care of medical patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21287905      PMCID: PMC5956905          DOI: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)30779-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc        ISSN: 0027-9684            Impact factor:   1.798


  28 in total

1.  Screening for serious mental illness in the general population.

Authors:  Ronald C Kessler; Peggy R Barker; Lisa J Colpe; Joan F Epstein; Joseph C Gfroerer; Eva Hiripi; Mary J Howes; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Ronald W Manderscheid; Ellen E Walters; Alan M Zaslavsky
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2003-02

2.  The relation between health-orientation, provider-patient communication, and satisfaction: an individual-difference approach.

Authors:  Mohan J Dutta-Bergman
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2005

3.  The influence of psychiatric disorders on patients' ratings of satisfaction with health care.

Authors:  R C Hermann; S L Ettner; R A Dorwart
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 4.  Meta-analysis of correlates of provider behavior in medical encounters.

Authors:  J A Hall; D L Roter; N R Katz
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Physicians' role in managing emotionally distressed patients already in psychotherapy.

Authors:  R L Brown; M B Mengel
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 0.493

6.  A qualitative study of patients' views on anxiety and depression.

Authors:  U T Kadam; P Croft; J McLeod; M Hutchinson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Physician-patient relationship and medication compliance: a primary care investigation.

Authors:  Ngaire Kerse; Stephen Buetow; Arch G Mainous; Gregory Young; Gregor Coster; Bruce Arroll
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

8.  Information and its impact on satisfaction among surgical patients.

Authors:  E Krupat; M Fancey; P D Cleary
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Patients' perceptions of GP non-verbal communication: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Ludmila Marcinowicz; Jerzy Konstantynowicz; Cezary Godlewski
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  Patient age influences perceptions about health care communication.

Authors:  Jennifer E DeVoe; Lorraine S Wallace; George E Fryer
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.756

View more
  8 in total

1.  Do health care users think electronic health records are important for themselves and their providers?: Exploring group differences in a national survey.

Authors:  Denise L Anthony; Celeste Campos-Castillo
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2013-11-16

2.  Health care avoidance among people with serious psychological distress: analyses of 2007 Health Information National Trends Survey.

Authors:  Jiali Ye; Ruth Shim; George Rust
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2012-11

3.  Association Between the Mental Health of Patients With Psoriasis and Their Satisfaction With Physicians.

Authors:  Charlotte Read; April W Armstrong
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 10.282

Review 4.  Healthcare Engagement as a Potential Source of Psychological Distress among People without Religious Beliefs: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Samuel R Weber; James W Lomax; Kenneth I Pargament
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2017-04-05

5.  Combining Direct and Indirect Measurements to Assess Patients' Satisfaction with the Quality of Public Health Services in Romania: Uncovering Structural Mechanisms and Their Implications.

Authors:  Elena Druică; Viorel Mihăilă; Marin Burcea; Vasile Cepoi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  The Influence of Patient-Provider Communication on Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Tiffany B Kindratt; Folefac Atem; Florence J Dallo; Marlyn Allicock; Bijal A Balasubramanian
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2020-05-11

7.  Self-reported pain among Cambodian Americans with depression: patient-provider communication as an overlooked social determinant.

Authors:  S Megan Berthold; Richard Feinn; Angela Bermudez-Millan; Thomas Buckley; Orfeu M Buxton; Sengly Kong; Theanvy Kuoch; Mary Scully; Tu Anh Ngo; Julie Wagner
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2022-09-23

8.  Quality assessment of cancer patient education materials: the current state of systemic therapy patient education in fourteen cancer centres across Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  J K Papadakos; E Giannopoulos; S McBain; L Forbes; P Jain; D Samoil; J Wang; V Zwicker; C Fox; L Moody; R McLeod
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 3.359

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.