Literature DB >> 33151399

Quality assessment of cancer patient education materials: the current state of systemic therapy patient education in fourteen cancer centres across Ontario, Canada.

J K Papadakos1,2,3, E Giannopoulos4, S McBain5, L Forbes6, P Jain5, D Samoil4, J Wang5, V Zwicker5, C Fox4, L Moody5, R McLeod7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Most patients diagnosed with cancer are administered systemic therapy and these patients are counselled and given printed education (PE) materials. High rates of low health literacy highlight the need to evaluate the quality of these PE materials.
METHODS: A current state assessment of the quality of PE materials was conducted in Ontario, Canada. Patient education leaders from 14 cancer centres submitted print materials on the topic of systemic cancer therapy to the assessment team. To report adherence to PE quality and health literacy best practices, the following validated measures were used: readability (FRY, SMOG and Flesch Reading Ease), understandability and actionability (Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT)). Materials at grade level 6 or lower and with PEMAT scores greater than 80% were considered to meet health literacy best practices.
RESULTS: A total of 1146 materials were submitted; 366 met inclusion criteria and 83 were selected for assessment. Most materials scored below the 80% target for understandability (x̄ = 73%, 31-100%) and actionability (x̄ = 68%, 20-100%), and above the recommended grade 6 readability level (x̄ = grade 9) meaning that the majority did not meet quality standards or best practices.
CONCLUSION: Results suggest that there is significant opportunity to improve the quality of PE materials distributed by cancer centres. The quality of PE materials is a critical safety and equity consideration when these materials convey important safety and self-care directives.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health literacy; Neoplasms; Patient education; Plain language; Systemic therapy

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33151399     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05859-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.359


  24 in total

Review 1.  Health literacy and public health: a systematic review and integration of definitions and models.

Authors:  Kristine Sørensen; Stephan Van den Broucke; James Fullam; Gerardine Doyle; Jürgen Pelikan; Zofia Slonska; Helmut Brand
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 2.  "Best practice" for patient-centered communication: a narrative review.

Authors:  Ann King; Ruth B Hoppe
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2013-09

Review 3.  Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review.

Authors:  Nancy D Berkman; Stacey L Sheridan; Katrina E Donahue; David J Halpern; Karen Crotty
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 4.  Impact of health literacy on medication adherence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ning Jackie Zhang; Amanda Terry; Colleen A McHorney
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 3.154

5.  Scope of symptoms and self-management strategies for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Rebecca M Speck; Angela DeMichele; John T Farrar; Sean Hennessy; Jun J Mao; Margaret G Stineman; Frances K Barg
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 6.  Health literacy and cancer communication.

Authors:  Terry C Davis; Mark V Williams; Estela Marin; Ruth M Parker; Jonathan Glass
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 7.  The effects of education on anxiety levels in patients receiving chemotherapy for the first time: an integrative review.

Authors:  Sarah Garcia
Journal:  Clin J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.027

8.  Preparing patients for threatening medical treatments: effects of a chemotherapy educational DVD on anxiety, unmet needs, and self-efficacy.

Authors:  Penelope Schofield; Michael Jefford; Mariko Carey; Kathryn Thomson; Melanie Evans; Carl Baravelli; Sanchia Aranda
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Perceived distress and its association with depression and anxiety in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Chong Guan Ng; Salina Mohamed; Kiran Kaur; Ahmad Hatim Sulaiman; Nor Zuraida Zainal; Nur Aishah Taib
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  From chemotherapy to biological therapy: A review of novel concepts to reduce the side effects of systemic cancer treatment (Review).

Authors:  Volker Schirrmacher
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 5.650

View more
  4 in total

1.  Health Literacy and Radiation Therapy: a Current State Assessment of Patient Education Materials.

Authors:  Eleni Giannopoulos; Sarah McBain; Meredith Giuliani; Jenney Wang; Victoria Zwicker; Colleen Fox; Janet Papadakos
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 1.771

Review 2.  Plausible conditions and mechanisms for increasing physical activity behavior in men with prostate cancer using patient education interventions: sequential explanatory mixed studies synthesis.

Authors:  Elochukwu Fortune Ezenwankwo; Portia Motsoeneng; Elizabeth Maria Atterbury; Yumna Albertus; Estelle Victoria Lambert; Delva Shamley
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 3.  Identifying gaps in consumer health library collections: a retrospective review.

Authors:  Eleni Giannopoulos; Michelle Snow; Mollie Manley; Katie McEwan; Andrew Stechkevich; Meredith Elana Giuliani; Janet Papadakos
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2021-10-01

4.  Exploring Urological Malignancies on Pinterest: Content Analysis.

Authors:  Naeemul Hassan; Rena D Malik; Stacy Loeb; Akya Myrie; Amber S Herbert
Journal:  JMIR Cancer       Date:  2022-08-22
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.