Literature DB >> 21287606

Remeasuring HEWL pK(a) values by NMR spectroscopy: methods, analysis, accuracy, and implications for theoretical pK(a) calculations.

Helen Webb1, Barbara Mary Tynan-Connolly, Gregory M Lee, Damien Farrell, Fergal O'Meara, Chresten R Søndergaard, Kaare Teilum, Chandralal Hewage, Lawrence P McIntosh, Jens Erik Nielsen.   

Abstract

Site-specific pK(a) values measured by NMR spectroscopy provide essential information on protein electrostatics, the pH-dependence of protein structure, dynamics and function, and constitute an important benchmark for protein pK(a) calculation algorithms. Titration curves can be measured by tracking the NMR chemical shifts of several reporter nuclei versus sample pH. However, careful analysis of these curves is needed to extract residue-specific pK(a) values since pH-dependent chemical shift changes can arise from many sources, including through-bond inductive effects, through-space electric field effects, and conformational changes. We have re-measured titration curves for all carboxylates and His 15 in Hen Egg White Lysozyme (HEWL) by recording the pH-dependent chemical shifts of all backbone amide nitrogens and protons, Asp/Glu side chain protons and carboxyl carbons, and imidazole protonated carbons and protons in this protein. We extracted pK(a) values from the resulting titration curves using standard fitting methods, and compared these values to each other, and with those measured previously by ¹H NMR (Bartik et al., Biophys J 1994;66:1180–1184). This analysis gives insights into the true accuracy associated with experimentally measured pK(a) values. We find that apparent pK(a) values frequently differ by 0.5–1.0 units depending upon the nuclei monitored, and that larger differences occasionally can be observed. The variation in measured pK(a) values, which reflects the difficulty in fitting and assigning pH-dependent chemical shifts to specific ionization equilibria, has significant implications for the experimental procedures used for measuring protein pK(a) values, for the benchmarking of protein pK(a) calculation algorithms, and for the understanding of protein electrostatics in general.
Copyright © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21287606     DOI: 10.1002/prot.22886

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  37 in total

1.  Thermodynamic coupling of protonation and conformational equilibria in proteins: theory and simulation.

Authors:  Chuanyin Shi; Jason A Wallace; Jana K Shen
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Highly perturbed pKa values in the unfolded state of hen egg white lysozyme.

Authors:  John Bradley; Fergal O'Meara; Damien Farrell; Jens Erik Nielsen
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Non-uniform sampling of NMR relaxation data.

Authors:  Troels E Linnet; Kaare Teilum
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 2.835

Review 4.  The pKa Cooperative: a collaborative effort to advance structure-based calculations of pKa values and electrostatic effects in proteins.

Authors:  Jens E Nielsen; M R Gunner; Bertrand E García-Moreno
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-10-15

5.  Continuous Constant pH Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Transmembrane Proteins.

Authors:  Yandong Huang; Jack A Henderson; Jana Shen
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

6.  Protein dielectric constants determined from NMR chemical shift perturbations.

Authors:  Predrag Kukic; Damien Farrell; Lawrence P McIntosh; Bertrand García-Moreno E; Kristine Steen Jensen; Zigmantas Toleikis; Kaare Teilum; Jens Erik Nielsen
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  Side chain electrostatic interactions and pH-dependent expansion of the intrinsically disordered, highly acidic carboxyl-terminus of γ-tubulin.

Authors:  Brandon J Payliss; Jackie Vogel; Anthony K Mittermaier
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  On the development of protein pKa calculation algorithms.

Authors:  Tommy Carstensen; Damien Farrell; Yong Huang; Nathan A Baker; Jens Erik Nielsen
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-07-08

Review 9.  Biomolecular electrostatics and solvation: a computational perspective.

Authors:  Pengyu Ren; Jaehun Chun; Dennis G Thomas; Michael J Schnieders; Marcelo Marucho; Jiajing Zhang; Nathan A Baker
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 5.318

10.  Dissecting electrostatic interactions in Bacillus circulans xylanase through NMR-monitored pH titrations.

Authors:  Lawrence P McIntosh; Daigo Naito; Simon J Baturin; Mark Okon; Manish D Joshi; Jens E Nielsen
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 2.835

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.