Li-Ming Su1. 1. Robotic and Minimally Invasive Urologic Surgery, Department of Urology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA. sulm@urology.ufl.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To provide an update of recent studies relevant to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, highlighting technical modifications and associated functional outcomes, mid-term oncologic results and patient perception and satisfaction. RECENT FINDINGS: Several recent studies have investigated methods of further reducing the morbidities associated with prostatectomy, namely erectile dysfunction and incontinence. These studies provide important anatomic insights into additional mechanisms responsible for potency and incontinence and measures for preserving both. Mid-term oncologic outcomes have also been reported; further substantiating the role of robotics in the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer. SUMMARY: The technique of robotic prostatectomy has evolved over the last decade with significant efforts in improving functional outcomes following surgery. However, aggressive-marketing campaigns and lack of regulation of hospital websites may be contributing to unrealistic expectations in patients who choose to undergo robotic prostatectomy, resulting in dissatisfaction for some patients. National interests in this topic will likely result in the mandate for more stringent studies to assess the comparative effectiveness of robot-assisted prostatectomy with other competing therapies for clinically localized prostate cancer.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To provide an update of recent studies relevant to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, highlighting technical modifications and associated functional outcomes, mid-term oncologic results and patient perception and satisfaction. RECENT FINDINGS: Several recent studies have investigated methods of further reducing the morbidities associated with prostatectomy, namely erectile dysfunction and incontinence. These studies provide important anatomic insights into additional mechanisms responsible for potency and incontinence and measures for preserving both. Mid-term oncologic outcomes have also been reported; further substantiating the role of robotics in the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer. SUMMARY: The technique of robotic prostatectomy has evolved over the last decade with significant efforts in improving functional outcomes following surgery. However, aggressive-marketing campaigns and lack of regulation of hospital websites may be contributing to unrealistic expectations in patients who choose to undergo robotic prostatectomy, resulting in dissatisfaction for some patients. National interests in this topic will likely result in the mandate for more stringent studies to assess the comparative effectiveness of robot-assisted prostatectomy with other competing therapies for clinically localized prostate cancer.
Authors: Jae Hung Jung; Francis Raymond P Arkoncel; Jae Won Lee; Cheol Kyu Oh; Noor Ashani Md Yusoff; Kwang Jin Kim; Koon Ho Rha Journal: Yonsei Med J Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 2.759
Authors: A I Tasci; I Tufek; E Gumus; A E Canda; V Tugcu; F Atug; U Boylu; Z Akbulut; S Sahin; A Simsek; A R Kural Journal: World J Urol Date: 2014-09-13 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Jie Li; Zhi-Hong Zhang; Chang-Jun Yin; Christian Pavlovich; Jun Luo; Robert Getzenberg; Wei Zhang Journal: Asian J Androl Date: 2012-08-06 Impact factor: 3.285
Authors: Liang Gao; Haijun Zhou; Michael J Thrall; Fuhai Li; Yaliang Yang; Zhiyong Wang; Pengfei Luo; Kelvin K Wong; Ganesh S Palapattu; Stephen T C Wong Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2011-03-18 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Elvin S Allakhverdiev; Venera V Khabatova; Bekzhan D Kossalbayev; Elena V Zadneprovskaya; Oleg V Rodnenkov; Tamila V Martynyuk; Georgy V Maksimov; Saleh Alwasel; Tatsuya Tomo; Suleyman I Allakhverdiev Journal: Cells Date: 2022-01-24 Impact factor: 6.600
Authors: Willem Brinkman; Isabel de Angst; Henk Schreuder; Barbara Schout; Werner Draaisma; Lisanne Verweij; Ad Hendrikx; Henk van der Poel Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2016-05-18 Impact factor: 4.584