Literature DB >> 21287024

The role of letter recognition in word recognition.

M J Cosky1.   

Abstract

In a paradigm that avoids methodological problems of earlier studies, evidence was gathered addressed to the question of whether we read letter by letter. If word recognition involves letter recognition, then the difficulty of recognizing a word should vary with the difficulty of recognizing its letters. This was tested by assessing letter difficulty in two letter discrimination tasks and in a letter naming task, and then comparing 15 adult subjects' visual recognition latency to 72 easy-letter words and to 72 difficult-letter words. Word frequency and word length were also manipulated. Results indicated no effect for letter difficulty, although recognition latency reliably decreased with word frequency and monotonically increased with word length (21 msec/letter), suggesting that we do not read letter by letter, but that whatever plays a role in word recognition is smaller than the word and correlated with word length in letters.

Entities:  

Year:  1976        PMID: 21287024     DOI: 10.3758/BF03213165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  9 in total

1.  Visual duration threshold as a function of word-probability.

Authors:  D H HOWES; R L SOLOMON
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1951-06

2.  Failure to find a syllabic effect in number naming.

Authors:  L Henderson; M Coltheart; D Woodhouse
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1973-09

3.  Perception of letters, words, and nonwords.

Authors:  D W Massaro
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1973-10

4.  Visual information and redundancy in reading.

Authors:  M C Thompson; D W Massaro
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1973-04

5.  Why words are perceived more accurately than nonwords: inference versus unitization.

Authors:  E E Smith; S E Haviland
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1972-01

6.  Implicit speech inferred from response latencies in same-different decisions.

Authors:  S T Klapp
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-12

7.  Perceptual recognition as a function of meaninfulness of stimulus material.

Authors:  G M Reicher
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1969-08

8.  Classification without identification in visual search.

Authors:  J Brand
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-05       Impact factor: 2.143

9.  Naming sequentially presented letters and words.

Authors:  P A Kolers; M T Katzman
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  1966 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.500

  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  Duration differences between rare and common words and their implications for the interpretation of word frequency effects.

Authors:  C E Wright
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1979-11

2.  The generalizability of context effects on word recognition: a reconsideration of the roles of parafoveal priming and sentence context.

Authors:  K E Stanovich; R F West
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1983-01

Review 3.  The letter-frequency effect and the generality of familiarity effects on perception.

Authors:  I B Appelman; M S Mayzner
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-11

4.  Response latency and accuracy in visual word recognition.

Authors:  C Schiepers
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.