| Literature DB >> 21286409 |
Misung Kim1, Heeseon Kim, Cheongmin Sohn.
Abstract
Vitamin K intake has been reported as an essential factor for bone formation. The current study was conducted under the hypothesis that insufficient vitamin K intake would affect inflammatory markers and bone mineral density in young adult women. The study was a cross-sectional design that included 75 women in their 20s. Physical assessments, bone mineral density measurements, 24-hr dietary recalls, and biochemical assessments for high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and percentages of undercarboxylated osteocalcin (%ucOC) were performed. An analysis of vitamin K nutritional status was performed comparing first, second, and third tertiles of intake based on %ucOC in plasma. Vitamin K intake levels in the first, second, and third tertiles were 94.88 ± 51.48 µg, 73.85 ± 45.15 µg, and 62.58 ± 39.92 µg, respectively (P < 0.05). The T-scores of the first and third tertiles were 1.06 and -0.03, respectively, indicating that bone mineral density was significantly lower in the group with lower vitamin K intake (P < 0.05). There was a tendency for different serum hs-CRP concentrations between the first (0.04 ± 0.02) and third tertiles (0.11 ± 0.18), however this was not statistically significant. Regression analysis was performed to identify the correlations between vitamin K nutritional status, inflammatory markers, and bone mineral density after adjusting for age and BMI. Serum hs-CRP concentrations were positively correlated with vitamin K deficiency status (P < 0.05). And bone mineral density, which was represented by speed, was negatively correlated with vitamin K deficiency status (P < 0.05). In conclusion, status of vitamin K affects inflammatory status and bone formation. Therefore, sufficient intake of vitamin K is required to secure peak bone mass in young adult women.Entities:
Keywords: Vitamin K; bone mineral density; hs-CRP; osteocalcin; undercarboxylated osteocalcin
Year: 2010 PMID: 21286409 PMCID: PMC3029792 DOI: 10.4162/nrp.2010.4.6.507
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutr Res Pract ISSN: 1976-1457 Impact factor: 1.926
Anthropometric measurements of the subjects by % Undercarboxylated Osteocalcin
1)% Undercarboxylated Osteocalcin : Tertile 1 < 19.34%, Tertile 2 : 19.34% - 32.01%, Tertile 3 > 32.01%
2)Body mass index
3)Waist-Hip Ratio
4)Mean ± SD
*P < 0.05 by F-test
Significance as determined by ANOVA-test
Bone mineral density of the subjects by % Undercarboxylated Osteocalcin
1)% Undercarboxylated Osteocalcin : Tertile 1 < 19.34%, Tertile 2 : 19.34% - 32.01%, Tertile 3 > 32.01%
2)Mean ± SD
3)OI : Osteoporosis index
4)SOS : Speed of sounds
*P < 0.05
Significance as determined by ANOVA-test
a,bValues with different letters within the same line are significantly different from each other by Tukey's test at P = 0.05.
Biochemical assessments of subjects by % Undercarboxylated Osteocalcin
1)% Undercarboxylated Osteocalcin : Tertile 1 < 19.34%, Tertile 2 : 19.34% - 32.01%, Tertile 3 > 32.01%
2)Mean ± SD
3)T-Chol : Total Cholesterol
4)TG : Triglyceride
5)TP : Total-Protein
6)HDL-Chol : High Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol
7)LDL-Chol : Low Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol
8)Osteocalcin
9)Undercarboxylated Osteocalcin
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001
Significance as determined by ANOVA - test
a, b, cvalues with different letters within the same line are significantly different from each other by Tukey's test at P = 0.05.
Nutrient intakes of subjects by % Undercarboxylated osteocalcin
1)% Undercarboxylated Osteocalcin : Tertile 1 < 19.34%, Tertile 2 : 19.34% - 32.01%, Tertile 3 > 32.01%
2)EER : Estimated Energy Requirements
3)EAR Estimated Average Requirements
4)AI : Adequate Intake
5)Mean ± SD
6)C: P: F (%) : Carbohydrate : Protein : Fat
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01
Significance as determined by ANOVA-test
Associations between serum %ucOC and biochemical markers and bone mineral density
1)% ucOC : % Undercarboxylated Osteocalcin
2)SOS : Speed of sound