Literature DB >> 21285532

Immunologic non-inferiority of a newly licensed inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine versus an established vaccine: a randomized study in US adults.

James D Campbell1, Christopher V Chambers, Rebecca C Brady, Michael C Caldwell, Nathan L Bennett, Marc A Fourneau, Varsha K Jain, Bruce L Innis.   

Abstract

A trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (Fluarix (™) , GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals) was licensed under US accelerated approval regulations. We performed a randomized, observer-blind, post-approval study to demonstrate its immunological non-inferiority versus an established US-licensed vaccine (primary endpoint). Adult (including elderly) subjects received a single injection of newly-licensed vaccine (n = 923) or established vaccine (n = 922). Serum hemagglutination-inhibition titers were determined pre-vaccination and 21-28 days after vaccination. Non-inferiority was assessed by post-vaccination geometric mean titer (GMT) ratio (upper 95% confidence interval [CI] ≤ 1.5) and difference in seroconversion rate (upper 95% CI ≤ 0.1) for all three vaccine strains. Safety was monitored for 6 months. The newly-licensed vaccine was non-inferior to the established vaccine in all subjects (≥ 18 years) and in elderly subjects (≥ 65 years). Adjusted GMT ratios (established/newly-licensed) against the H1N1, H3N2 and B strains were 0.65 (95% CI: 0.58, 0.73), 0.93 (0.83, 1.04) and 1.13 (1.03, 1.25) for all subjects and 0.75 (0.67, 0.85), 0.95 (0.82, 1.09) and 1.13 (1.00, 1.27) for elderly subjects. Corresponding values for the differences in seroconversion rate (established minus newly-licensed) were -0.12 (-0.16, -0.07), -0.02 (-0.06, 0.03) and 0.01 (-0.04, 0.06) for all subjects and -0.11 (-0.16, -0.05), -0.02 (-0.07, 0.04) and 0.02 (-0.04, 0.08) for elderly subjects. The most common adverse events with both vaccines were injection site pain, fatigue and headache, and no serious adverse events or deaths were considered related; there were no clinically relevant differences between the vaccines. In conclusion, the newly-licensed vaccine was well tolerated and immunologically non-inferior to the established vaccine for all three vaccine strains in the whole population and the elderly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21285532      PMCID: PMC3062242          DOI: 10.4161/hv.7.1.13553

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Vaccin        ISSN: 1554-8600


  28 in total

1.  Decreased antibody titers and booster responses in tick-borne encephalitis vaccinees aged 50-90 years.

Authors:  Birgit Weinberger; Michael Keller; Karl-Heinz Fischer; Karin Stiasny; Christoph Neuner; Franz X Heinz; Beatrix Grubeck-Loebenstein
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2010-03-21       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  Vaccination versus treatment of influenza in working adults: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Michael B Rothberg; David N Rose
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 3.  Antibody response to influenza vaccination in the elderly: a quantitative review.

Authors:  Katherine Goodwin; Cécile Viboud; Lone Simonsen
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2005-09-19       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  Influence of clinical outcome and outcome period definitions on estimates of absolute clinical and economic benefits of influenza vaccination in community dwelling elderly persons.

Authors:  K L Nichol; J Nordin; J Mullooly
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2005-10-18       Impact factor: 3.641

5.  The efficacy, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of inactivated influenza virus vaccines.

Authors:  Kristin L Nichol
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 3.641

6.  Effectiveness and cost-benefit of influenza vaccination of healthy working adults: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  C B Bridges; W W Thompson; M I Meltzer; G R Reeve; W J Talamonti; N J Cox; H A Lilac; H Hall; A Klimov; K Fukuda
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-10-04       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Mortality associated with influenza and respiratory syncytial virus in the United States.

Authors:  William W Thompson; David K Shay; Eric Weintraub; Lynnette Brammer; Nancy Cox; Larry J Anderson; Keiji Fukuda
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-01-08       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Incidence of outpatient visits and hospitalizations related to influenza in infants and young children.

Authors:  Megan A O'Brien; Timothy M Uyeki; David K Shay; William W Thompson; Ken Kleinman; Alexander McAdam; Xian-Jie Yu; Richard Platt; Tracy A Lieu
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Immunogenicity of combined hepatitis A and B vaccine in elderly persons.

Authors:  Bernd Wolters; Ulrich Junge; Stefan Dziuba; Michael Roggendorf
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2003-09-08       Impact factor: 3.641

10.  Influenza-associated hospitalizations in the United States.

Authors:  William W Thompson; David K Shay; Eric Weintraub; Lynnette Brammer; Carolyn B Bridges; Nancy J Cox; Keiji Fukuda
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  2 in total

1.  Immunogenicity and safety of an inactivated 2012/2013 trivalent influenza vaccine produced in mammalian cell culture (Optaflu®): an open label, uncontrolled study.

Authors:  Christof David Vinnemeier; Johanna Fischer-Herr; Seetha Meyer; Katja Liebig; Wiebke Theeß; Gerd-Dieter Burchard; Jakob P Cramer
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  A randomized controlled study to evaluate the immunogenicity of a trivalent inactivated seasonal influenza vaccine at two dosages in children 6 to 35 months of age.

Authors:  Noris Pavia-Ruz; Miguel Angel Rodriguez Weber; Yu-Lung Lau; E Anthony S Nelson; Angkool Kerdpanich; Li-Min Huang; Peter Silas; Paul Qaqundah; Mark Blatter; Robert Jeanfreau; Paul Lei; Varsha Jain; Mohamed El Idrissi; Yang Feng; Bruce Innis; Mathieu Peeters; Jeanne-Marie Devaster
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 3.452

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.