Literature DB >> 11015795

Effectiveness and cost-benefit of influenza vaccination of healthy working adults: A randomized controlled trial.

C B Bridges1, W W Thompson, M I Meltzer, G R Reeve, W J Talamonti, N J Cox, H A Lilac, H Hall, A Klimov, K Fukuda.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Although the cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit of influenza vaccination are well established for persons aged 65 years or older, the benefits for healthy adults younger than 65 years are less clear.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and cost-benefit of influenza vaccine in preventing influenza-like illness (ILI) and reducing societal costs of ILI among healthy working adults.
DESIGN: Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial conducted during 2 influenza seasons. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Healthy adults aged 18 to 64 years and employed full-time by a US manufacturing company (for 1997-1998 season, n = 1184; for 1998-1999 season, n = 1191).
INTERVENTIONS: For each season, participants were randomly assigned to receive either trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (n = 595 in 1997-1998 and n = 587 in 1998-1999) or sterile saline injection (placebo; n = 589 in 1997-1998 and n = 604 in 1998-1999). Participants in 1997-1998 were rerandomized if they participated in 1998-1999. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Influenza-like illnesses and associated physician visits and work absenteeism reported in biweekly questionnaires by all participants, and serologically confirmed influenza illness among 23% of participants in each year (n = 275 in 1997-1998; n = 278 in 1998-1999); societal cost of ILI per vaccinated vs unvaccinated person.
RESULTS: For 1997-1998 and 1998-1999, respectively, 95% (1130/1184) and 99% (1178/1191) of participants had complete follow-up, and 23% in each year had serologic testing. In 1997-1998, when the vaccine virus differed from the predominant circulating viruses, vaccine efficacy against serologically confirmed influenza illness was 50% (P =.33). In this season, vaccination did not reduce ILI, physician visits, or lost workdays; the net societal cost was $65.59 per person compared with no vaccination. In 1998-1999, the vaccine and predominant circulating viruses were well matched. Vaccine efficacy was 86% (P =.001), and vaccination reduced ILI, physician visits, and lost workdays by 34%, 42%, and 32%, respectively. However, vaccination resulted in a net societal cost of $11.17 per person compared with no vaccination.
CONCLUSION: Influenza vaccination of healthy working adults younger than 65 years can reduce the rates of ILI, lost workdays, and physician visits during years when the vaccine and circulating viruses are similar, but vaccination may not provide overall economic benefits in most years. JAMA. 2000;284:1655-1663.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11015795     DOI: 10.1001/jama.284.13.1655

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  172 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacoeconomics of influenza vaccination for healthy working adults: reviewing the available evidence.

Authors:  Maarten J Postma; Paul Jansema; Marianne L L van Genugten; Marie-Louise A Heijnen; Johannes C Jager; Lolkje T W de Jong-van den Berg
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Discordant antigenic drift of neuraminidase and hemagglutinin in H1N1 and H3N2 influenza viruses.

Authors:  Matthew R Sandbulte; Kim B Westgeest; Jin Gao; Xiyan Xu; Alexander I Klimov; Colin A Russell; David F Burke; Derek J Smith; Ron A M Fouchier; Maryna C Eichelberger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A model to estimate the cost benefit of an occupational vaccination programme for influenza with Influvac in the UK.

Authors:  Roben Das Gupta; Julian F Guest
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Influenza and cardiovascular disease: is there a causal relationship?

Authors:  Mohammad Madjid; Ibrahim Aboshady; Imran Awan; Silvio Litovsky; S Ward Casscells
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2004

5.  Immunosenescence and Challenges of Vaccination against Influenza in the Aging Population.

Authors:  Adrian J Reber; Tatiana Chirkova; Jin Hyang Kim; Weiping Cao; Renata Biber; David K Shay; Suryaprakash Sambhara
Journal:  Aging Dis       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 6.745

Review 6.  Influenza vaccines: from surveillance through production to protection.

Authors:  Pritish K Tosh; Robert M Jacobson; Gregory A Poland
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 7.616

7.  An evaluation of vignettes for predicting variation in the quality of preventive care.

Authors:  Timothy R Dresselhaus; John W Peabody; Jeff Luck; Dan Bertenthal
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Universal influenza immunization. Were Ontario family physicians prepared?

Authors:  Grant Russell; Judy Sutton; Graham J Reid; Charlene Beynon; Irene Cohen; David Huffman
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 9.  Intranasal cold-adapted influenza virus vaccine combined with inactivated influenza virus vaccines: an extra boost for the elderly?

Authors:  Paul V Targonski; Gregory A Poland
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.923

10.  Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of vaccination against pandemic influenza (H1N1) 2009.

Authors:  Nayer Khazeni; David W Hutton; Alan M Garber; Nathaniel Hupert; Douglas K Owens
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 25.391

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.