Literature DB >> 21285110

Health outcomes in economic evaluation: who should value health?

Eugena Stamuli1.   

Abstract

The valuation of health states is an integral part of economic evaluation studies. The source of these valuations (general public vs. patients) is surrounded by controversy. Health state values generated by the general public are often different compared with those of patients. General public values may not account for adaptation of the patients; patients' values potentially incorporate self-interest. Decisions on the appropriate source of health values ultimately depend on the specific decision-making context and objectives of the evaluation. Differences in valuations and implications for decision-making should be explicitly addressed. Further research should systematically identify circumstances in which public and patients' valuations diverge. There appears ground for development of methods that allow the simultaneous incorporation of patients and public preferences. Existing literature which discusses the issues around the health state valuation is summarized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21285110     DOI: 10.1093/bmb/ldr001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med Bull        ISSN: 0007-1420            Impact factor:   4.291


  19 in total

1.  Comparison of health state values derived from patients and individuals from the general population.

Authors:  Mihir Gandhi; Ru San Tan; Raymond Ng; Su Pin Choo; Whay Kuang Chia; Chee Keong Toh; Carolyn Lam; Phong Teck Lee; Nang Khaing Zar Latt; Kim Rand-Hendriksen; Yin Bun Cheung; Nan Luo
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Comparing the Preferences of Patients and the General Public for Treatment Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Norah L Crossnohere; Sarah Janse; Ellen Janssen; John F P Bridges
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Evaluation of Societal Health Utility of Facial Palsy and Facial Reanimation.

Authors:  Callum Faris; Oren Tessler; Alyssa Heiser; Tessa Hadlock; Nate Jowett
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 4.611

4.  Do chronic disease patients value generic health states differently from individuals with no chronic disease? A case of a multicultural Asian population.

Authors:  Mihir Gandhi; Julian Thumboo; Nan Luo; Hwee-Lin Wee; Yin-Bun Cheung
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 3.186

5.  Elicitation of health state utilities associated with varying severities of flares in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

Authors:  C Pollard; S Hartz; S Liu Leage; M A Paget; J Cook; A Enstone
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 3.186

Review 6.  What matters to patients? A systematic review of preferences for medication-associated outcomes in mental disorders.

Authors:  Øystein Eiring; Brynjar Fowels Landmark; Endre Aas; Glenn Salkeld; Magne Nylenna; Kari Nytrøen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  A comparison of EuroQol 5-Dimension health-related utilities using Italian, UK, and US preference weights in a patient sample.

Authors:  Adelaide Mozzi; Michela Meregaglia; Carlo Lazzaro; Valentina Tornatore; Maurizio Belfiglio; Giovanni Fattore
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2016-06-13

8.  Multiple Sclerosis Patients Valuing Their Own Health Status: Valuation and Psychometric Properties of the 15D.

Authors:  Ioannis E Dagklis; Vasilis H Aletras; Efthymia Tsantaki; Anastasios Orologas; Dimitrios Niakas
Journal:  Neurol Int       Date:  2016-09-30

9.  Prioritising patients for bariatric surgery: building public preferences from a discrete choice experiment into public policy.

Authors:  Jennifer A Whitty; Julie Ratcliffe; Elizabeth Kendall; Paul Burton; Andrew Wilson; Peter Littlejohns; Paul Harris; Rachael Krinks; Paul A Scuffham
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  A comparison of injured patient and general population valuations of EQ-5D health states for New Zealand.

Authors:  Ross Wilson; Paul Hansen; John Langley; Sarah Derrett
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.