Literature DB >> 21284505

Comparison of goldmann applanation tonometer, noncontact tonometer, and TonoPen XL for intraocular pressure measurement in different types of glaucomatous, ocular hypertensive, and normal eyes.

Na Rae Kim1, Chan Yun Kim, Hyunjoong Kim, Gong Je Seong, Eun Suk Lee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements by Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), noncontact tonometer (NCT), and TonoPen XL in glaucomatous, ocular hypertensive (OHT), and normal eyes, all with various central corneal thickness (CCT).
METHODS: In 508 subjects, IOP was measured by three different tonometers: GAT, NCT, and TonoPen. CCT was also measured.
RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference between IOP measurements made using the three different tonometers (RMANOVA, P < 0.0001). Both NCT/GAT and TonoPen/GAT differences were significantly associated with age, CCT, IOP, and glaucoma diagnosis (multiple regression analysis, all P ≤ 0.05). CCT and IOP had the greatest effect on IOP measurement variance by different tonometers. IOP measurements made by NCT were consistently higher than those made by GAT; this difference increased both with IOP and CCT levels, but decreased with age and OHT. In addition, TonoPen overestimated the GAT in the eyes of subjects with OHT.
CONCLUSION: IOP measurement differences between the three tonometers are affected by age, type of glaucoma, and especially CCT and IOP levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21284505     DOI: 10.3109/02713683.2010.542865

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Eye Res        ISSN: 0271-3683            Impact factor:   2.424


  9 in total

1.  Ketamine sedation is not associated with clinically meaningful elevation of intraocular pressure.

Authors:  Patrick C Drayna; Cristina Estrada; Wenli Wang; Benjamin R Saville; Donald H Arnold
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 2.469

2.  Comparative analysis of biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure with corneal visualization Scheimpflug technology versus conventional noncontact intraocular pressure.

Authors:  Jiaonan Ma; Yan Wang; Weiting Hao; Vishal Jhanji
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Agreement among Goldmann applanation tonometer, iCare, and Icare PRO rebound tonometers; non-contact tonometer; and Tonopen XL in healthy elderly subjects.

Authors:  Yoshitake Kato; Shunsuke Nakakura; Naoko Matsuo; Kayo Yoshitomi; Marina Handa; Hitoshi Tabuchi; Yoshiaki Kiuchi
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-09       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  OCT and IOP findings in a healthy worker cohort: results from a teleophthalmic study in occupational medicine.

Authors:  Elisabeth Grau; F Horn; U Nixdorff; G Michelson
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Dependence of dynamic contour and Goldmann applanation tonometries on peripheral corneal thickness.

Authors:  Federico Saenz-Frances; Claudia Sanz-Pozo; Lara Borrego-Sanz; Luis Jañez; Laura Morales-Fernandez; Jose Maria Martinez-de-la-Casa; Julian Garcia-Sanchez; Julian Garcia-Feijoo; Enrique Santos-Bueso
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

6.  Changes in intraocular pressure values measured with noncontact tonometer (NCT), ocular response analyzer (ORA) and corvis scheimpflug technology tonometer (CST) in the early phase after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

Authors:  Yang Shen; Xiangjian Su; Xiu Liu; Huamao Miao; Xuejun Fang; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 2.209

7.  Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements in Healthy Pediatric Patients using Three Types of Tonometers.

Authors:  Muhsin Eraslan; Eren Çerman; Sena Sümmen
Journal:  Turk J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-01-17

8.  Intraocular pressure and axial length changes during altitude acclimatization from Beijing to Lhasa.

Authors:  Yuan Wu; Ci Ren Qiong Da; Jiang Liu; Xiaoming Yan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  How should we measure intraocular pressure in the era of coronavirus disease 2019? Balancing infectious risk, cleaning requirements, and accuracy.

Authors:  Christine A Petersen; Andrew Chen; Philip P Chen
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 3.761

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.