BACKGROUND: Microsomal (m) prostaglandin (PG) E₂ synthase (S)-1 catalyzes the formation of PGE₂ from PGH₂, a cyclooxygenase product that is derived from arachidonic acid. Previous studies in mice suggest that targeting mPGES-1 may be less likely to cause hypertension or thrombosis than cyclooxygenase-2-selective inhibition or deletion in vivo. Indeed, deletion of mPGES-1 retards atherogenesis and angiotensin II-induced aortic aneurysm formation. The role of mPGES-1 in the response to vascular injury is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: Mice were subjected to wire injury of the femoral artery. Both neointimal area and vascular stenosis were significantly reduced 4 weeks after injury in mPGES-1 knockout mice compared with wild-type controls (65.6 ± 5.7 versus 37.7 ± 5.1 × 10³ pixel area and 70.5 ± 13.4% versus 47.7 ± 17.4%, respectively; P < 0.01). Induction of tenascin-C, a proproliferative and promigratory extracellular matrix protein, after injury was attenuated in the knockouts. Consistent with in vivo rediversion of PG biosynthesis, mPGES-1-deleted vascular smooth muscle cells generated less PGE₂ but more PGI₂ and expressed reduced tenascin-C compared with wild-type cells. Both suppression of PGE₂ and augmentation of PGI₂ attenuate tenascin-C expression and vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration in vitro. CONCLUSIONS: Deletion of mPGES-1 in mice attenuates neointimal hyperplasia after vascular injury, in part by regulating tenascin-C expression. This raises for consideration the therapeutic potential of mPGES-1 inhibitors as adjuvant therapy for percutaneous coronary intervention.
BACKGROUND: Microsomal (m) prostaglandin (PG) E₂ synthase (S)-1 catalyzes the formation of PGE₂ from PGH₂, a cyclooxygenase product that is derived from arachidonic acid. Previous studies in mice suggest that targeting mPGES-1 may be less likely to cause hypertension or thrombosis than cyclooxygenase-2-selective inhibition or deletion in vivo. Indeed, deletion of mPGES-1retards atherogenesis and angiotensin II-induced aortic aneurysm formation. The role of mPGES-1 in the response to vascular injury is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS:Mice were subjected to wire injury of the femoral artery. Both neointimal area and vascular stenosis were significantly reduced 4 weeks after injury in mPGES-1 knockout mice compared with wild-type controls (65.6 ± 5.7 versus 37.7 ± 5.1 × 10³ pixel area and 70.5 ± 13.4% versus 47.7 ± 17.4%, respectively; P < 0.01). Induction of tenascin-C, a proproliferative and promigratory extracellular matrix protein, after injury was attenuated in the knockouts. Consistent with in vivo rediversion of PG biosynthesis, mPGES-1-deleted vascular smooth muscle cells generated less PGE₂ but more PGI₂ and expressed reduced tenascin-C compared with wild-type cells. Both suppression of PGE₂ and augmentation of PGI₂ attenuate tenascin-C expression and vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration in vitro. CONCLUSIONS: Deletion of mPGES-1 in mice attenuates neointimal hyperplasia after vascular injury, in part by regulating tenascin-C expression. This raises for consideration the therapeutic potential of mPGES-1 inhibitors as adjuvant therapy for percutaneous coronary intervention.
Authors: Robin D Clark; Alam Jahangir; Daniel Severance; Rick Salazar; Thomas Chang; David Chang; Mary Frances Jett; Steven Smith; Keith Bley Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Lett Date: 2004-02-23 Impact factor: 2.823
Authors: M Sata; Y Maejima; F Adachi; K Fukino; A Saiura; S Sugiura; T Aoyagi; Y Imai; H Kurihara; K Kimura; M Omata; M Makuuchi; Y Hirata; R Nagai Journal: J Mol Cell Cardiol Date: 2000-11 Impact factor: 5.000
Authors: Yan Cheng; Sandra C Austin; Bianca Rocca; Beverly H Koller; Thomas M Coffman; Tilo Grosser; John A Lawson; Garret A FitzGerald Journal: Science Date: 2002-04-19 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Catherine E Trebino; Jeffrey L Stock; Colleen P Gibbons; Brian M Naiman; Timothy S Wachtmann; John P Umland; Karamjeet Pandher; Jean-Martin Lapointe; Sipra Saha; Marsha L Roach; Demetrius Carter; Nathalie A Thomas; Becky A Durtschi; John D McNeish; John E Hambor; Per-Johan Jakobsson; Thomas J Carty; Jose R Perez; Laurent P Audoly Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2003-06-30 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: David M McKean; Lila Sisbarro; Dusko Ilic; Nihal Kaplan-Alburquerque; Raphael Nemenoff; Mary Weiser-Evans; Michael J Kern; Peter Lloyd Jones Journal: J Cell Biol Date: 2003-04-28 Impact factor: 10.539
Authors: Lihong Chen; Guangrui Yang; James Monslow; Leslie Todd; David P Cormode; Jun Tang; Gregory R Grant; Jonathan H DeLong; Soon Yew Tang; John A Lawson; Ellen Pure; Garret A Fitzgerald Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-04-21 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Eiichi Hasegawa; Saori Inafuku; Lama Mulki; Yoko Okunuki; Ryoji Yanai; Kaylee E Smith; Clifford B Kim; Garrett Klokman; Diane R Bielenberg; Narender Puli; John R Falck; Deeba Husain; Joan W Miller; Matthew L Edin; Darryl C Zeldin; Kin Sing Stephen Lee; Bruce D Hammock; Wolf-Hagen Schunck; Kip M Connor Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-08-21 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Soon Yew Tang; James Monslow; Gregory R Grant; Leslie Todd; Sven-Christian Pawelzik; Lihong Chen; John Lawson; Ellen Puré; Garret A FitzGerald Journal: Circulation Date: 2016-07-26 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jian Zhang; Fangfang Zou; Juan Tang; Qianqian Zhang; Yanjun Gong; Qingsong Wang; Yujun Shen; Lixia Xiong; Richard M Breyer; Michael Lazarus; Colin D Funk; Ying Yu Journal: Circ Res Date: 2013-04-17 Impact factor: 17.367