Literature DB >> 21282142

The effect of health promotion on diagnosis and management of diabetes.

Jinkook Lee1, James P Smith.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Undiagnosed disease is one of the critical public health problems in the world. In 2002 South Korea introduced the nation's first comprehensive public health promotion policy, Health Plan 2010. The first phase of Health Plan 2010 started in 2002, promoting the early detection of diseases and preventive care and continued until 2005.
METHODS: Using the 2001 and 2005 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys that were fielded before and after the health promotion programme, this study investigated the changes in healthcare utilisation and its impacts on the prevalence of diagnosed and undiagnosed diabetes as well as good management of the disease.
RESULTS: A significant increase in diabetes diagnoses has occurred during this time period, especially for those with low education and older age. It was found that, during this time period, the prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes was significantly reduced especially among older and less-educated Koreans, the principal targets of the programme. This health promotion was also found to have had significant positive effects on the good management of diabetes.
CONCLUSIONS: The increase in preventive health care through medical check-ups among less-educated, older people suggests that the implementation of free medical check-ups for individual aged 40 years and older may have a positive impact on those who had not previously used preventive care. The positive experience in South Korea indicates that similarly designed public health campaigns in other countries have enormous potential for improving the detection and management of chronic disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21282142      PMCID: PMC3619717          DOI: 10.1136/jech.2009.087304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  14 in total

Review 1.  Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-01-10       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Prevalence of diabetes and impaired fasting glucose in adults in the U.S. population: National Health And Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2002.

Authors:  Catherine C Cowie; Keith F Rust; Danita D Byrd-Holt; Mark S Eberhardt; Katherine M Flegal; Michael M Engelgau; Sharon H Saydah; Desmond E Williams; Linda S Geiss; Edward W Gregg
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  Nature and causes of trends in male diabetes prevalence, undiagnosed diabetes, and the socioeconomic status health gradient.

Authors:  James P Smith
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-08-14       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  What explains the American disadvantage in health compared with the English? The case of diabetes.

Authors:  James Banks; Meena Kumari; James P Smith; Paola Zaninotto
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  Trends in the prevalence and ratio of diagnosed to undiagnosed diabetes according to obesity levels in the U.S.

Authors:  Edward W Gregg; Betsy L Cadwell; Yiling J Cheng; Catherine C Cowie; Desmond E Williams; Linda Geiss; Michael M Engelgau; Frank Vinicor
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Waist circumference of healthy men and women in the United States.

Authors:  K M Flegal
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 5.095

7.  Waist circumference as a measure for indicating need for weight management.

Authors:  M E Lean; T S Han; C E Morrison
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-07-15

8.  Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030.

Authors:  Sarah Wild; Gojka Roglic; Anders Green; Richard Sicree; Hilary King
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  Can patient self-management help explain the SES health gradient?

Authors:  Dana P Goldman; James P Smith
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-07-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Type 2 diabetes mellitus and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chun Chao; John H Page
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 4.897

View more
  6 in total

1.  Socioeconomic gradients of cardiovascular risk factors in China and India: results from the China health and retirement longitudinal study and longitudinal aging study in India.

Authors:  Peifeng Hu; Serena Wang; Jinkook Lee
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.380

Review 2.  Nonpharmacological interventions for the prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Peter E Schwarz; Colin J Greaves; Jaana Lindström; Thomas Yates; Melanie J Davies
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 43.330

3.  Trends in adherence to dietary recommendations among Korean type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.

Authors:  Kyong Park
Journal:  Nutr Res Pract       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 1.926

4.  Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Knowledge Assessment among Saudi Women.

Authors:  Ahmad S Alharthi; Khalid A Althobaiti; Khaled A Alswat
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2018-08-19

5.  Level of and factors associated with awareness of gestational diabetes mellitus among pregnant women attending antenatal care at Kawempe National Referral Hospital: a cross sectional study.

Authors:  Elizabeth Byakwaga; Musa Sekikubo; Annettee Nakimuli
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  International Comparisons in Health Economics: Evidence from Aging Studies.

Authors:  James Banks; James P Smith
Journal:  Annu Rev Econom       Date:  2012-04-05
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.