Literature DB >> 21281720

Human reversal learning under conditions of certain versus uncertain outcomes.

Anna-Maria D'Cruz1, Michael E Ragozzino, Matthew W Mosconi, Mani N Pavuluri, John A Sweeney.   

Abstract

Reversal learning tasks assess behavioral flexibility by requiring subjects to switch from one learned response choice to a different response choice when task contingencies change. This requires both the processing of negative feedback once a learned response is no longer reinforced, and the capacity for flexible response selection. In 2-choice reversal learning tasks, subjects switch between only two responses. Multiple choice reversal learning is qualitatively different in that at reversal, it requires subjects to respond to non-reinforcement of a learned response by selecting a new response from among several alternatives that have uncertain consequences. While activity in brain regions responsible for processing unexpected negative feedback is known to increase in relation to the hedonic value of the reward itself, it is not known whether the uncertainty of reinforcement for future response choices also modulates these responses. In an fMRI study, 15 participants performed 2- and 4-choice reversal learning tasks. Upon reversal in both tasks, activation was observed in brain regions associated with processing changing reinforcement contingencies (midbrain, ventral striatum, insula), as well as in neocortical regions that support cognitive control and behavioral planning (prefrontal, premotor, posterior parietal, and anterior cingulate cortices). Activation in both systems was greater in the 4- than in the 2-choice task. Therefore, reinforcement uncertainty for future responses enhanced activity in brain systems that process performance feedback, as well as in areas supporting behavioral planning of future response choices. A mutually facilitative integration of responses in motivational and cognitive brain systems might enhance behavioral flexibility and decision making in conditions for which outcomes for future response choices are uncertain.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21281720      PMCID: PMC3096874          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  55 in total

Review 1.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL.

Authors:  Stephen M Smith; Mark Jenkinson; Mark W Woolrich; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Peter R Bannister; Marilena De Luca; Ivana Drobnjak; David E Flitney; Rami K Niazy; James Saunders; John Vickers; Yongyue Zhang; Nicola De Stefano; J Michael Brady; Paul M Matthews
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Neural components underlying behavioral flexibility in human reversal learning.

Authors:  Dara G Ghahremani; John Monterosso; J David Jentsch; Robert M Bilder; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Changing directions of forthcoming arm movements: neuronal activity in the presupplementary and supplementary motor area of monkey cerebral cortex.

Authors:  Y Matsuzaka; J Tanji
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Primate analogue of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: effects of excitotoxic lesions of the prefrontal cortex in the marmoset.

Authors:  R Dias; T W Robbins; A C Roberts
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 5.  A neural substrate of prediction and reward.

Authors:  W Schultz; P Dayan; P R Montague
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-03-14       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  The involvement of the orbitofrontal cortex in learning under changing task contingencies.

Authors:  Jenna Kim; Michael E Ragozzino
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.877

7.  Oculomotor response inhibition abnormalities in pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Authors:  D R Rosenberg; D H Averbach; K M O'Hearn; A B Seymour; B Birmaher; J A Sweeney
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1997-09

8.  Role of the human anterior cingulate cortex in the control of oculomotor, manual, and speech responses: a positron emission tomography study.

Authors:  T Paus; M Petrides; A C Evans; E Meyer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 9.  Motor areas of the medial wall: a review of their location and functional activation.

Authors:  N Picard; P L Strick
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Responses of monkey dopamine neurons to reward and conditioned stimuli during successive steps of learning a delayed response task.

Authors:  W Schultz; P Apicella; T Ljungberg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  24 in total

1.  Juvenile mice show greater flexibility in multiple choice reversal learning than adults.

Authors:  Carolyn Johnson; Linda Wilbrecht
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 6.464

2.  Maternal immune activation impairs cognitive flexibility and alters transcription in frontal cortex.

Authors:  Dionisio A Amodeo; Chi-Yu Lai; Omron Hassan; Eran A Mukamel; M Margarita Behrens; Susan B Powell
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 5.996

3.  Cognitive set shifting deficits and their relationship to repetitive behaviors in autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Haylie L Miller; Michael E Ragozzino; Edwin H Cook; John A Sweeney; Matthew W Mosconi
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2015-03

4.  Animal Models for OCD Research.

Authors:  Brittany L Chamberlain; Susanne E Ahmari
Journal:  Curr Top Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021

5.  Neural correlates of reversal learning in severe mood dysregulation and pediatric bipolar disorder.

Authors:  Nancy E Adleman; Reilly Kayser; Daniel Dickstein; R James R Blair; Daniel Pine; Ellen Leibenluft
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 8.829

Review 6.  Dissecting impulsivity and its relationships to drug addictions.

Authors:  J David Jentsch; James R Ashenhurst; M Catalina Cervantes; Stephanie M Groman; Alexander S James; Zachary T Pennington
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 5.691

7.  Reduced behavioral flexibility in autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Anna-Maria D'Cruz; Michael E Ragozzino; Matthew W Mosconi; Sunil Shrestha; Edwin H Cook; John A Sweeney
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus lesions impair probabilistic reversal learning by reducing sensitivity to positive reward feedback.

Authors:  Anam Syed; Phillip M Baker; Michael E Ragozzino
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 2.877

9.  Regressing to Prior Response Preference After Set Switching Implicates Striatal Dysfunction Across Psychotic Disorders: Findings From the B-SNIP Study.

Authors:  S Kristian Hill; James L Reilly; Michael E Ragozzino; Leah H Rubin; Jeffrey R Bishop; Ruben C Gur; Elliot S Gershon; Carol A Tamminga; Godfrey D Pearlson; Matcheri S Keshavan; Richard S E Keefe; John A Sweeney
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 9.306

10.  Reversal Learning Deficits Associated with Increased Frontal Cortical Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Tyrosine Kinase B Signaling in a Prenatal Cocaine Exposure Mouse Model.

Authors:  Deirdre M McCarthy; Genevieve A Bell; Elisa N Cannon; Kaly A Mueller; Megan N Huizenga; Ghazaleh Sadri-Vakili; Debra A Fadool; Pradeep G Bhide
Journal:  Dev Neurosci       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.