OBJECTIVE: To determine whether parental periodontal disease history is a risk factor for periodontal disease in adult offspring. METHODS: Proband periodontal examination [combined attachment loss (CAL) at age 32, and incidence of CAL from ages 26 to 32] and interview data were collected during the age-32 assessments in the Dunedin Study. Parental data were also collected. The sample was divided into two familial-risk groups for periodontal disease (high- and low-risk) based on parents' self-reported periodontal disease. RESULTS: Periodontal risk analysis involved 625 proband-parent(s) groups. After controlling for confounding factors, the high-familial-risk periodontal group was more likely to have 1+ sites with 4+mm CAL [relative risk (RR) 1.45; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11-1.88], 2+ sites with 4+mm CAL (RR 1.45; 95% CI 1.03-2.05), 1+ sites with 5+mm CAL (RR 1.60; 95% CI 1.02-2.50), and 1+ sites with 3+mm incident CAL (RR 1.64; 95% CI 1.01-2.66) than the low-familial-risk group. Predictive validity was enhanced when information was available from both parents. CONCLUSIONS: Parents with poor periodontal health tend to have offspring with poor periodontal health. Family/parental history of oral health is a valid representation of the shared genetic and environmental factors that contribute to an individual's periodontal status, and may help to predict patient prognosis and preventive treatment need.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether parental periodontal disease history is a risk factor for periodontal disease in adult offspring. METHODS: Proband periodontal examination [combined attachment loss (CAL) at age 32, and incidence of CAL from ages 26 to 32] and interview data were collected during the age-32 assessments in the Dunedin Study. Parental data were also collected. The sample was divided into two familial-risk groups for periodontal disease (high- and low-risk) based on parents' self-reported periodontal disease. RESULTS: Periodontal risk analysis involved 625 proband-parent(s) groups. After controlling for confounding factors, the high-familial-risk periodontal group was more likely to have 1+ sites with 4+mm CAL [relative risk (RR) 1.45; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11-1.88], 2+ sites with 4+mm CAL (RR 1.45; 95% CI 1.03-2.05), 1+ sites with 5+mm CAL (RR 1.60; 95% CI 1.02-2.50), and 1+ sites with 3+mm incident CAL (RR 1.64; 95% CI 1.01-2.66) than the low-familial-risk group. Predictive validity was enhanced when information was available from both parents. CONCLUSIONS: Parents with poor periodontal health tend to have offspring with poor periodontal health. Family/parental history of oral health is a valid representation of the shared genetic and environmental factors that contribute to an individual's periodontal status, and may help to predict patient prognosis and preventive treatment need.
Authors: K R Merikangas; M Stolar; D E Stevens; J Goulet; M A Preisig; B Fenton; H Zhang; S S O'Malley; B J Rounsaville Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 1998-11
Authors: Paula W Yoon; Maren T Scheuner; Kris L Peterson-Oehlke; Marta Gwinn; Andrew Faucett; Muin J Khoury Journal: Genet Med Date: 2002 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Antonio Manuel Pérez Barrionuevo; Francisco Gómez Real; Jannicke Igland; Ane Johannessen; Ernst Omenaas; Karl A Franklin; Laura Pérez Barrionuevo; Anne Nordrehaug Åstrøm; Cecilie Svanes; Randi Jacobsen Bertelsen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-01-19 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Hong Chen; Rui Zhang; Ran Cheng; Ting Xu; Tao Zhang; Xiao Hong; Xing Zhao; Yunyun Wu; Li Cheng; Tao Hu Journal: BMC Oral Health Date: 2020-05-19 Impact factor: 2.757