Literature DB >> 21281275

Kernel machine approach to testing the significance of multiple genetic markers for risk prediction.

Tianxi Cai1, Giulia Tonini, Xihong Lin.   

Abstract

There is growing evidence that genomic and proteomic research holds great potential for changing irrevocably the practice of medicine. The ability to identify important genomic and biological markers for risk assessment can have a great impact in public health from disease prevention, to detection, to treatment selection. However, the potentially large number of markers and the complexity in the relationship between the markers and the outcome of interest impose a grand challenge in developing accurate risk prediction models. The standard approach to identifying important markers often assesses the marginal effects of individual markers on a phenotype of interest. When multiple markers relate to the phenotype simultaneously via a complex structure, such a type of marginal analysis may not be effective. To overcome such difficulties, we employ a kernel machine Cox regression framework and propose an efficient score test to assess the overall effect of a set of markers, such as genes within a pathway or a network, on survival outcomes. The proposed test has the advantage of capturing the potentially nonlinear effects without explicitly specifying a particular nonlinear functional form. To approximate the null distribution of the score statistic, we propose a simple resampling procedure that can be easily implemented in practice. Numerical studies suggest that the test performs well with respect to both empirical size and power even when the number of variables in a gene set is not small compared to the sample size.
© 2011, The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21281275      PMCID: PMC3165098          DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2010.01544.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  23 in total

1.  Knowledge-based analysis of microarray gene expression data by using support vector machines.

Authors:  M P Brown; W N Grundy; D Lin; N Cristianini; C W Sugnet; T S Furey; M Ares; D Haussler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-01-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Learning eigenfunctions links spectral embedding and kernel PCA.

Authors:  Yoshua Bengio; Olivier Delalleau; Nicolas Le Roux; Jean-François Paiement; Pascal Vincent; Marie Ouimet
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.026

3.  Testing association of a pathway with survival using gene expression data.

Authors:  Jelle J Goeman; Jan Oosting; Anne-Marie Cleton-Jansen; Jakob K Anninga; Hans C van Houwelingen
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-01-18       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Comparison of maximum statistics for hypothesis testing when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative.

Authors:  Gang Zheng; Zehua Chen
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Reproducibility of differential gene detection across multiple microarray studies.

Authors:  Tan M Vo; John H Phan; Kiet N T Huynh; May D Wang
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2007

6.  Semiparametric regression of multidimensional genetic pathway data: least-squares kernel machines and linear mixed models.

Authors:  Dawei Liu; Xihong Lin; Debashis Ghosh
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Association of genetic variants in the Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor AKAP13 with familial breast cancer.

Authors:  Michael Wirtenberger; Sandrine Tchatchou; Kari Hemminki; Rüdiger Klaes; Rita K Schmutzler; Justo L Bermejo; Bowang Chen; Barbara Wappenschmidt; Alfons Meindl; Claus R Bartram; Barbara Burwinkel
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2005-10-18       Impact factor: 4.944

8.  Antitumor activity of gefitinib in malignant rhabdoid tumor cells in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Yasumichi Kuwahara; Hajime Hosoi; Shinya Osone; Masakazu Kita; Tomoko Iehara; Hiroshi Kuroda; Tohru Sugimoto
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 9.  Advances in breast cancer: pathways to personalized medicine.

Authors:  Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Tatyana A Grushko; Rita Nanda; Dezheng Huo
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Estimation and testing for the effect of a genetic pathway on a disease outcome using logistic kernel machine regression via logistic mixed models.

Authors:  Dawei Liu; Debashis Ghosh; Xihong Lin
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-06-24       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  26 in total

1.  Calcium intake, polymorphisms of the calcium-sensing receptor, and recurrent/aggressive prostate cancer.

Authors:  Moritz Binder; Irene M Shui; Kathryn M Wilson; Kathryn L Penney; Lorelei A Mucci; Adam S Kibel
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  Kernel machine SNP-set analysis for censored survival outcomes in genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Xinyi Lin; Tianxi Cai; Michael C Wu; Qian Zhou; Geoffrey Liu; David C Christiani; Xihong Lin
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 2.135

Review 3.  Kernel methods for large-scale genomic data analysis.

Authors:  Xuefeng Wang; Eric P Xing; Daniel J Schaid
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 11.622

4.  Boosting the Power of the Sequence Kernel Association Test by Properly Estimating Its Null Distribution.

Authors:  Kai Wang
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Gene-Based Association Analysis for Censored Traits Via Fixed Effect Functional Regressions.

Authors:  Ruzong Fan; Yifan Wang; Qi Yan; Ying Ding; Daniel E Weeks; Zhaohui Lu; Haobo Ren; Richard J Cook; Momiao Xiong; Anand Swaroop; Emily Y Chew; Wei Chen
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 2.135

6.  Omnibus risk assessment via accelerated failure time kernel machine modeling.

Authors:  Jennifer A Sinnott; Tianxi Cai
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  FLCRM: Functional linear cox regression model.

Authors:  Dehan Kong; Joseph G Ibrahim; Eunjee Lee; Hongtu Zhu
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Sequence kernel association test for survival traits.

Authors:  Han Chen; Thomas Lumley; Jennifer Brody; Nancy L Heard-Costa; Caroline S Fox; L Adrienne Cupples; Josée Dupuis
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2014-01-26       Impact factor: 2.135

9.  Kernel machine SNP-set testing under multiple candidate kernels.

Authors:  Michael C Wu; Arnab Maity; Seunggeun Lee; Elizabeth M Simmons; Quaker E Harmon; Xinyi Lin; Stephanie M Engel; Jeffrey J Molldrem; Paul M Armistead
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 2.135

10.  Identifying predictive markers for personalized treatment selection.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Shen; Tianxi Cai
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.