BACKGROUND: Penile fracture usually results from direct trauma to the erected penis. We evaluate the outcomes of surgical and conservative treatment. METHODS: Between February 2000 and February 2007, 77 patients with mean age 29 ± 2.5 years (range, 20-57 years) with penile fracture were evaluated retrospectively. A total of 56 patients (group A) were treated with immediate surgical repair and 21 patients (group B) were treated conservatively as they refused surgical intervention. Data on erectile function and any penile sequel were obtained during follow-up using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-15) questionnaire, local examination, and color Doppler ultrasonography reports. RESULTS: Only 69 patients were available for median follow-up period of 20.8 months (range, 17-30 months), 51 patients of the group A and 18 of the group B. Injury involved unilateral and bilateral corporeal rupture in 50 and 6 cases, respectively. Concomitant urethral injury was detected in three cases. During follow-up, 49 cases (96%) of the surgical group (A) and 9 cases (50%) of the conservative group (B) reported erection adequate for intercourse, with no voiding dysfunction and no penile curvature. However, the remaining nine patients (50%) from the conservative group (B) reported erectile dysfunction and penile deviation. CONCLUSIONS: Immediate surgical repair of the penile fracture gave good results and is superior to conservative treatment; however, we cannot distinguish false from true penile fracture accurately to determine on whom we can use the conservative treatment.
BACKGROUND:Penile fracture usually results from direct trauma to the erected penis. We evaluate the outcomes of surgical and conservative treatment. METHODS: Between February 2000 and February 2007, 77 patients with mean age 29 ± 2.5 years (range, 20-57 years) with penile fracture were evaluated retrospectively. A total of 56 patients (group A) were treated with immediate surgical repair and 21 patients (group B) were treated conservatively as they refused surgical intervention. Data on erectile function and any penile sequel were obtained during follow-up using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-15) questionnaire, local examination, and color Doppler ultrasonography reports. RESULTS: Only 69 patients were available for median follow-up period of 20.8 months (range, 17-30 months), 51 patients of the group A and 18 of the group B. Injury involved unilateral and bilateral corporeal rupture in 50 and 6 cases, respectively. Concomitant urethral injury was detected in three cases. During follow-up, 49 cases (96%) of the surgical group (A) and 9 cases (50%) of the conservative group (B) reported erection adequate for intercourse, with no voiding dysfunction and no penile curvature. However, the remaining nine patients (50%) from the conservative group (B) reported erectile dysfunction and penile deviation. CONCLUSIONS: Immediate surgical repair of the penile fracture gave good results and is superior to conservative treatment; however, we cannot distinguish false from true penile fracture accurately to determine on whom we can use the conservative treatment.
Authors: Allen F Morey; Steve Brandes; Daniel David Dugi; John H Armstrong; Benjamin N Breyer; Joshua A Broghammer; Bradley A Erickson; Jeff Holzbeierlein; Steven J Hudak; Jeffrey H Pruitt; James T Reston; Richard A Santucci; Thomas G Smith; Hunter Wessells Journal: J Urol Date: 2014-05-20 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Gregory J Nason; Barry B McGuire; Stephen Liddy; Aisling Looney; Gerald M Lennon; David W Mulvin; David J Galvin; David M Quinlan Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2013 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.862