Literature DB >> 21277872

XRCC1 and ERCC1 variants modify malignant mesothelioma risk: a case-control study.

M Betti1, D Ferrante, M Padoan, S Guarrera, M Giordano, A Aspesi, D Mirabelli, C Casadio, F Ardissone, E Ruffini, P G Betta, R Libener, R Guaschino, G Matullo, E Piccolini, C Magnani, I Dianzani.   

Abstract

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare aggressive tumor associated with asbestos exposure. The possible role of genetic factors has also been suggested and MPM has been associated with single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of xenobiotic and oxidative metabolism enzymes. We have identified an association of the DNA repair gene XRCC1 with MPM in the population of Casale Monferrato, a town exposed to high asbestos pollution. To extend this observation we examined 35 SNPs in 15 genes that could be involved in MPM carcinogenicity in 220 MPM patients and 296 controls from two case-control studies conducted in Casale (151 patients, 252 controls) and Turin (69 patients, 44 controls), respectively. Unconditional multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Two DNA repair genes were associated with MPM, i.e. XRCC1 and ERCC1. Considering asbestos-exposed only, the risk increased with the increasing number of XRCC1-399Q alleles (Casale: OR=1.44, 95%CI 1.02-2.03; Casale+Turin: OR=1.34, 95%CI 0.98-1.84) or XRCC1 -77T alleles (Casale+Turin: OR=1.33, 95%CI 0.97-1.81). The XRCC1-TGGGGGAACAGA haplotype was significantly associated with MPM (Casale: OR=1.76, 95%CI 1.04-2.96). Patients heterozygotes for ERCC1 N118N showed an increased OR in all subjects (OR=1.66, 95%CI 1.06-2.60) and in asbestos-exposed only (OR=1.59, 95%CI 1.01-2.50). When the dominant model was considered (i.e. ERCC1 heterozygotes CT plus homozygotes CC versus homozygotes TT) the risk was statistically significant both in all subjects (OR=1.61, 95%CI 1.06-2.47) and in asbestos-exposed only (OR=1.56, 95%CI 1.02-2.40). The combination of ERCC1 N118N and XRCC1 R399Q was statistically significant (Casale: OR=2.02, 95%CI 1.01-4.05; Casale+Turin: OR=2.39, 95%CI 1.29-4.43). The association of MPM with DNA repair genes support the hypothesis that an increased susceptibility to DNA damage may favour asbestos carcinogenicity.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21277872     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2011.01.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  9 in total

Review 1.  The genetic susceptibility in the development of malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  Ombretta Melaiu; Federica Gemignani; Stefano Landi
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Reduced expression of DNA repair genes (XRCC1, XPD, and OGG1) in squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck in North India.

Authors:  Anil Kumar; Mohan Chand Pant; Hirdya Shanker Singh; Shashi Khandelwal
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2011-11-15

3.  The polymorphisms in the MGMT gene and the risk of cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Liang Du; Haichuan Wang; Tianyuan Xiong; Yaxian Ma; Jiqiao Yang; Jichong Huang; Dong Zeng; Xiaoze Wang; He Huang; Jin Huang
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2013-06-13

4.  Genetic variants associated with increased risk of malignant pleural mesothelioma: a genome-wide association study.

Authors:  Giuseppe Matullo; Simonetta Guarrera; Marta Betti; Giovanni Fiorito; Daniela Ferrante; Floriana Voglino; Gemma Cadby; Cornelia Di Gaetano; Fabio Rosa; Alessia Russo; Ari Hirvonen; Elisabetta Casalone; Sara Tunesi; Marina Padoan; Mara Giordano; Anna Aspesi; Caterina Casadio; Francesco Ardissone; Enrico Ruffini; Pier Giacomo Betta; Roberta Libener; Roberto Guaschino; Ezio Piccolini; Monica Neri; Arthur W B Musk; Nicholas H de Klerk; Jennie Hui; John Beilby; Alan L James; Jenette Creaney; Bruce W Robinson; Sutapa Mukherjee; Lyle J Palmer; Dario Mirabelli; Donatella Ugolini; Stefano Bonassi; Corrado Magnani; Irma Dianzani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Prevalence of at-risk genotypes for genotoxic effects decreases with age in a randomly selected population in Flanders: a cross sectional study.

Authors:  Hans B Ketelslegers; Roger W L Godschalk; Ralph W H Gottschalk; Ad M Knaapen; Gudrun Koppen; Greet Schoeters; Willy F Baeyens; Vera Nelen; Joep P M Geraedts; Joost H M van Delft; Jos C S Kleinjans; Nicolas A van Larebeke
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 5.984

Review 6.  DNA repair and damage pathways in mesothelioma development and therapy.

Authors:  Faezeh Malakoti; Niloufar Targhazeh; Erfan Abadifard; Reza Zarezadeh; Sahar Samemaleki; Zatollah Asemi; Simin Younesi; Reza Mohammadnejad; Seyed Hadi Hossini; Ansar Karimian; Forough Alemi; Bahman Yousefi
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 6.429

7.  The influence of genetic variability of DNA repair mechanisms on the risk of malignant mesothelioma.

Authors:  Kristina Levpuscek; Katja Goricar; Viljem Kovac; Vita Dolzan; Alenka Franko
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 2.991

8.  New DNA Methylation Signals for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Giovanni Cugliari; Alessandra Allione; Alessia Russo; Chiara Catalano; Elisabetta Casalone; Simonetta Guarrera; Federica Grosso; Daniela Ferrante; Marika Sculco; Marta La Vecchia; Chiara Pirazzini; Roberta Libener; Dario Mirabelli; Corrado Magnani; Irma Dianzani; Giuseppe Matullo
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 9.  Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Genetic and Microenviromental Heterogeneity as an Unexpected Reading Frame and Therapeutic Challenge.

Authors:  David Michael Abbott; Chandra Bortolotto; Silvia Benvenuti; Andrea Lancia; Andrea Riccardo Filippi; Giulia Maria Stella
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 6.639

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.