PURPOSE: To introduce and evaluate a method of prospective motion correction for localized proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) using a single-camera optical tracking system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five healthy participants were scanned at 3T using a point-resolved spectroscopic sequence (PRESS) with a motion-tracking module and phase navigator. Head motion in six degrees was tracked with a Retro-Grate Reflector (RGR) tracking system and target via a mirror mounted inside the bore. Participants performed a series of three predetermined motion patterns during scanning. RESULTS: Left-right rotation (Rz) (average 12°) resulted in an increase in the total choline to total creatine ratio (Cho/Cr) of +14.6 ± 1.5% (P = 0.0009) for scans without correction, but no change for scans with correction (+1.1 ± 1.5%; P = 0.76). Spectra with uncorrected Z-translations showed large lipid peaks (skull) with changes in Cho/Cr of -13.2 ± 1.6% (P = 0.02, no motion correction) and -2.2 ± 2.4% (P = 0.51) with correction enabled. There were no significant changes in the ratios of N-acetylaspartate, glutamate+glutamine, or myo-inositol to creatine compared to baseline scans for all experiments. CONCLUSION: Prospective motion correction for 1H-MRS, using single-camera RGR tracking, can reduce spectral artifacts and quantitation errors in Cho/Cr ratios due to head motion and promises improved spectral quality and reproducibility.
PURPOSE: To introduce and evaluate a method of prospective motion correction for localized proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) using a single-camera optical tracking system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five healthy participants were scanned at 3T using a point-resolved spectroscopic sequence (PRESS) with a motion-tracking module and phase navigator. Head motion in six degrees was tracked with a Retro-Grate Reflector (RGR) tracking system and target via a mirror mounted inside the bore. Participants performed a series of three predetermined motion patterns during scanning. RESULTS:Left-right rotation (Rz) (average 12°) resulted in an increase in the total choline to total creatine ratio (Cho/Cr) of +14.6 ± 1.5% (P = 0.0009) for scans without correction, but no change for scans with correction (+1.1 ± 1.5%; P = 0.76). Spectra with uncorrected Z-translations showed large lipid peaks (skull) with changes in Cho/Cr of -13.2 ± 1.6% (P = 0.02, no motion correction) and -2.2 ± 2.4% (P = 0.51) with correction enabled. There were no significant changes in the ratios of N-acetylaspartate, glutamate+glutamine, or myo-inositol to creatine compared to baseline scans for all experiments. CONCLUSION: Prospective motion correction for 1H-MRS, using single-camera RGR tracking, can reduce spectral artifacts and quantitation errors in Cho/Cr ratios due to head motion and promises improved spectral quality and reproducibility.
Authors: Nathan White; Cooper Roddey; Ajit Shankaranarayanan; Eric Han; Dan Rettmann; Juan Santos; Josh Kuperman; Anders Dale Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Brian Keating; Weiran Deng; J Cooper Roddey; Nathan White; Anders Dale; V Andrew Stenger; Thomas Ernst Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Lei Qin; Peter van Gelderen; John Andrew Derbyshire; Fenghua Jin; Jongho Lee; Jacco A de Zwart; Yang Tao; Jeff H Duyn Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Jessica Schulz; Thomas Siegert; Enrico Reimer; Christian Labadie; Julian Maclaren; Michael Herbst; Maxim Zaitsev; Robert Turner Journal: MAGMA Date: 2012-06-13 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Gizeaddis L Simegn; Andre J W Van der Kouwe; Frances C Robertson; Ernesta M Meintjes; Ali Alhamud Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2018-12-02 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Kazim Gumus; Brian Keating; Nathan White; Brian Andrews-Shigaki; Brian Armstrong; Julian Maclaren; Maxim Zaitsev; Anders Dale; Thomas Ernst Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2014-09-24 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: James M Joers; Dinesh K Deelchand; Anjali Kumar; Amir Moheet; Elizabeth Seaquist; Pierre-Gilles Henry; Gülin Öz Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2016-07-12 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Aditya Singh; Benjamin Zahneisen; Brian Keating; Michael Herbst; Linda Chang; Maxim Zaitsev; Thomas Ernst Journal: MAGMA Date: 2015-06-30 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: F Godenschweger; U Kägebein; D Stucht; U Yarach; A Sciarra; R Yakupov; F Lüsebrink; P Schulze; O Speck Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2016-02-11 Impact factor: 3.609