Literature DB >> 21274108

Organizing the office for effective detection and management of hypertension.

M J Bass.   

Abstract

An effective office organization for screening and follow-up of hypertensives can be simple. The physician must first adopt a policy of regularly taking blood pressures of patients who attend for any reason. Notations on the outside of the chart are a visible record and reminder. A tickler file with 12 monthly divisions provides an efficient follow-up system. There are no ethical barriers to instituting this approach.

Entities:  

Year:  1985        PMID: 21274108      PMCID: PMC2327690     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN: 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


  7 in total

1.  A critical review of periodic health screening using specific screening criteria. Part 1: Selected diseases of respiratory, cardiovascular, and central nervous systems.

Authors:  P S Frame; S J Carlson
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 0.493

2.  Effectiveness of the family physician in hypertension screening and management.

Authors:  M J Bass; A Donner; I R McWhinney
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  The hypertensive patient: 2. Finding and linking to clinical care.

Authors:  D L Sackett
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1979-06-23       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Computer use by family physicians in the United States.

Authors:  G Schmittling
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 0.493

5.  Diagnosis and management of hypertension: the stated practices of family physicians.

Authors:  E Dunn; J Hilditch; M Chipman; G Hardacre; M Morrison
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1984-04-15       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Controversy in the detection of disease.

Authors:  D L Sackett; W W Holland
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1975-08-23       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  A long-term controlled trial of screening for hypertension in general practice.

Authors:  M F D'Souza; A V Swan; D J Shannon
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1976-06-05       Impact factor: 79.321

  7 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Do our patients receive maximum benefit from preventive care? A North American perspective.

Authors:  W W Rosser; H Lamberts
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  [Not Available].

Authors:  P E Hoogewerf
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Screening for squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix.

Authors:  G Owen
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 3.275

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.