S Charalampidou1, J Nolan, G O Ormonde, S Beatty. 1. Institute of Eye Surgery and Institute of Vision Research, Whitfield Clinic, Butlerstown North, Waterford, Ireland. sonia.sofia1@gmail.com
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to conduct a questionnaire-based survey of subjective visual perceptions induced by intravitreous (IVT) injections of therapeutic agents. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing an IVT injection of ranibizumab, pegaptanib sodium, or triamcinolone acetonide were administered a questionnaire in the immediate post-injection period and at 2 weeks of follow-up. RESULTS: In the immediate post-injection period (75 IVT injections, 75 eyes, 75 patients), lights and floaters were reported after 20 (27%) and 24 (32%) IVT injections, respectively. In comparison, at the 2-week follow-up, the incidence of reported lights (11; 15%) was similar (P>0.05), but the incidence of reported floaters was higher (48; 64%; P=0.00). Subgroup analysis for various injection subgroups (no previous injection vs previous injection(s) in the study eye; injections in study eyes with good VA (logarithm of minimal angle of resolution [logMAR] ≤ 0.3) vs moderate VA (0.7 <logMAR>0.3) vs poor VA (logMAR ≥ 0.7); injections according to pharmacological agent (ranibizumab vs pegaptanib vs triamcinolone acetonide); injections in study eyes with choroidal neovascularization (of various causes) vs study eyes with macular edema (of various causes); and injections in phakic vs pseudophakic eyes) did not reveal any statistically significant associations. Visual perceptions experienced following 15% of IVT injections gave cause for concern to the patient (mean visual analog scale score (± SD): 4.5 (± 1.7)), and in 64% of cases, the patients believed that preoperative counseling would have averted the concern. CONCLUSIONS: Lights and floaters are frequent visual perceptions following IVT injections of therapeutic agents. They can give rise to concern that could be alleviated with preinjection counseling.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to conduct a questionnaire-based survey of subjective visual perceptions induced by intravitreous (IVT) injections of therapeutic agents. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing an IVT injection of ranibizumab, pegaptanib sodium, or triamcinolone acetonide were administered a questionnaire in the immediate post-injection period and at 2 weeks of follow-up. RESULTS: In the immediate post-injection period (75 IVT injections, 75 eyes, 75 patients), lights and floaters were reported after 20 (27%) and 24 (32%) IVT injections, respectively. In comparison, at the 2-week follow-up, the incidence of reported lights (11; 15%) was similar (P>0.05), but the incidence of reported floaters was higher (48; 64%; P=0.00). Subgroup analysis for various injection subgroups (no previous injection vs previous injection(s) in the study eye; injections in study eyes with good VA (logarithm of minimal angle of resolution [logMAR] ≤ 0.3) vs moderate VA (0.7 <logMAR>0.3) vs poor VA (logMAR ≥ 0.7); injections according to pharmacological agent (ranibizumab vs pegaptanib vs triamcinolone acetonide); injections in study eyes with choroidal neovascularization (of various causes) vs study eyes with macular edema (of various causes); and injections in phakic vs pseudophakic eyes) did not reveal any statistically significant associations. Visual perceptions experienced following 15% of IVT injections gave cause for concern to the patient (mean visual analog scale score (± SD): 4.5 (± 1.7)), and in 64% of cases, the patients believed that preoperative counseling would have averted the concern. CONCLUSIONS: Lights and floaters are frequent visual perceptions following IVT injections of therapeutic agents. They can give rise to concern that could be alleviated with preinjection counseling.
Authors: David M Brown; Mark Michels; Peter K Kaiser; Jeffrey S Heier; Judy P Sy; Tsontcho Ianchulev Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Eduardo B Rodrigues; Carsten H Meyer; Astor Grumann; Helio Shiroma; Jonathan S Aguni; Michel E Farah Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Rene A Cervantes-Castañeda; Gian Paolo Giuliari; Michael J Gallagher; Taygan Yilmaz; Rebecca E MacDonell; Karina Quinones; Charles S Foster Journal: Eur J Ophthalmol Date: 2009 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.597
Authors: Suresh Mekala; Pankaja Dhoble; C R Vishwaraj; Ashish M Khodifad; Olivia M Hess; G S Lavanya Journal: Indian J Ophthalmol Date: 2021-04 Impact factor: 1.848