Literature DB >> 21273398

Predictors of measurement error in energy intake during pregnancy.

Eric Nowicki1, Anna-Maria Siega-Riz, Amy Herring, Ka He, Alison Stuebe, Andy Olshan.   

Abstract

Nutrition plays a critical role in maternal and fetal health; however, research on error in the measurement of energy intake during pregnancy is limited. The authors analyzed data on 998 women living in central North Carolina with singleton pregnancies during 2001-2005. Second-trimester diet was assessed by food frequency questionnaire. Estimated energy requirements were calculated using Institute of Medicine prediction equations, with adjustment for energy costs during the second trimester. Implausible values for daily energy intake were determined using confidence limits of agreement for energy intake/estimated energy requirements. Prevalences of low energy reporting (LER) and high energy reporting (HER) were 32.8% and 12.9%, respectively. In a multivariable analysis, pregravid body mass index was related to both LER and HER; LER was higher in both overweight (odds ratio = 1.96, 95% confidence interval: 1.26, 3.02; P = 0.031) and obese (odds ratio = 3.29, 95% confidence interval: 2.33, 4.65; P < 0.001) women than in normal-weight counterparts. Other predictors of LER included marriage and higher levels of physical activity. HER was higher among subjects who were underweight, African-American, and less educated and subjects who had higher depressive symptom scores. LER and HER are prevalent during pregnancy. Identifying their predictors may improve data collection and analytic methods for reducing systematic bias in the study of diet and reproductive outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21273398      PMCID: PMC3105438          DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwq402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  57 in total

1.  Dietary reference intakes for energy, carbohydrate, fiber, fat, fatty acids, cholesterol, protein and amino acids.

Authors:  Paula Trumbo; Sandra Schlicker; Allison A Yates; Mary Poos
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2002-11

2.  The sensitivity and specificity of the Goldberg cut-off for EI:BMR for identifying diet reports of poor validity.

Authors:  A E Black
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Longitudinal assessment of energy expenditure in pregnancy by the doubly labeled water method.

Authors:  G R Goldberg; A M Prentice; W A Coward; H L Davies; P R Murgatroyd; C Wensing; A E Black; M Harding; M Sawyer
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 7.045

4.  Evaluation of four methods for determining energy intake in young and older women: comparison with doubly labeled water measurements of total energy expenditure.

Authors:  A L Sawaya; K Tucker; R Tsay; W Willett; E Saltzman; G E Dallal; S B Roberts
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  Use of a multicultural food-frequency questionnaire with pregnant and lactating women.

Authors:  H E Forsythe; B Gage
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 7.045

6.  Internal and external components of emotionality in restrained and unrestrained eaters.

Authors:  J Polivy; C P Herman; S Warsh
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1978-10

7.  Metabolic syndrome in childhood: association with birth weight, maternal obesity, and gestational diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Charlotte M Boney; Anila Verma; Richard Tucker; Betty R Vohr
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Total daily energy expenditure among middle-aged men and women: the OPEN Study.

Authors:  Janet A Tooze; Dale A Schoeller; Amy F Subar; Victor Kipnis; Arthur Schatzkin; Richard P Troiano
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 7.045

9.  Social desirability bias in dietary self-report may compromise the validity of dietary intake measures.

Authors:  J R Hebert; L Clemow; L Pbert; I S Ockene; J K Ockene
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 7.196

10.  Use of a food frequency questionnaire in American Indian and Caucasian pregnant women: a validation study.

Authors:  Heather J Baer; Robin E Blum; Helaine R H Rockett; Jill Leppert; Jane D Gardner; Carol W Suitor; Graham A Colditz
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  10 in total

1.  Misreport of energy intake assessed with food records and 24-h recalls compared with total energy expenditure estimated with DLW.

Authors:  T S Lopes; R R Luiz; D J Hoffman; E Ferriolli; K Pfrimer; A S Moura; R Sichieri; R A Pereira
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Poorer maternal diet quality and increased birth weight.

Authors:  Madeline Grandy; Jonathan M Snowden; Janne Boone-Heinonen; Jonathan Q Purnell; Kent L Thornburg; Nicole E Marshall
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2017-05-18

3.  System Identification Approaches For Energy Intake Estimation: Enhancing Interventions For Managing Gestational Weight Gain.

Authors:  Penghong Guo; Daniel E Rivera; Jennifer S Savage; Emily E Hohman; Abigail M Pauley; Krista S Leonard; Danielle Symons Downs
Journal:  IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 5.485

4.  Changes in Dietary Intake in Pregnant Women from Periconception to Pregnancy in the Japan Environment and Children's Study: A Nationwide Japanese Birth Cohort Study.

Authors:  Kazue Ishitsuka; Satoshi Sasaki; Kiwako Yamamoto-Hanada; Hidetoshi Mezawa; Mizuho Konishi; Yukihiro Ohya
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2020-03

5.  Periconceptional bread intakes indicate New Zealand's proposed mandatory folic acid fortification program may be outdated: results from a postpartum survey.

Authors:  Simonette R Mallard; Andrew R Gray; Lisa A Houghton
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Low maternal adherence to a Mediterranean diet is associated with increase in methylation at the MEG3-IG differentially methylated region in female infants.

Authors:  Sarah Gonzalez-Nahm; Michelle Mendez; Whitney Robinson; Susan K Murphy; Cathrine Hoyo; Vijaya Hogan; Diane Rowley
Journal:  Environ Epigenet       Date:  2017-05-06

7.  Pre-pregnancy BMI, gestational weight gain and body image are associated with dietary under-reporting in pregnant Japanese women.

Authors:  Mie Shiraishi; Megumi Haruna; Masayo Matsuzaki; Ryoko Murayama; Satoshi Sasaki
Journal:  J Nutr Sci       Date:  2018-04-02

8.  The characterisation of overweight and obese women who are under reporting energy intake during pregnancy.

Authors:  L J Moran; S A McNaughton; Z Sui; C Cramp; A R Deussen; R M Grivell; J M Dodd
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Gestational Health Outcomes Among Pregnant Women in the United States by Level of Dairy Consumption and Quality of Diet, NHANES 2003-2016.

Authors:  Benjamin J K Davis; Xiaoyu Bi; Kelly A Higgins; Carolyn G Scrafford
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2022-08-08

10.  Pregnant mothers have limited knowledge and poor dietary diversity practices, but favorable attitude towards nutritional recommendations in rural Ethiopia: evidence from community-based study.

Authors:  Taddese Alemu Zerfu; Sibhatu Biadgilign
Journal:  BMC Nutr       Date:  2018-12-20
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.