Literature DB >> 21272746

Inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks: incidence, predictors, and impact on mortality.

Johannes B van Rees1, C Jan Willem Borleffs, Mihály K de Bie, Theo Stijnen, Lieselot van Erven, Jeroen J Bax, Martin J Schalij.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence, predictors, and outcome of inappropriate shocks in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) patients.
BACKGROUND: Despite the benefits of ICD therapy, inappropriate defibrillator shocks continue to be a significant drawback. The prognostic importance of inappropriate shocks outside the setting of a clinical trial remains unclear.
METHODS: From 1996 to 2006, all recipients of defibrillator devices equipped with intracardiac electrogram storage were included in the current analysis and clinically assessed at implantation. During follow-up, the occurrence of inappropriate ICD shocks and all-cause mortality was noted.
RESULTS: A total of 1,544 ICD patients (79% male, age 61 ± 13 years) were included in the analysis. During the follow-up period of 41 ± 18 months, 13% experienced ≥1 inappropriate shocks. The cumulative incidence steadily increased to 18% at 5-year follow-up. Independent predictors of the occurrence of inappropriate shocks included a history of atrial fibrillation (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.0, p < 0.01) and age younger than 70 years (HR: 1.8, p = 0.01). Experiencing a single inappropriate shock resulted in an increased risk of all-cause mortality (HR: 1.6, p = 0.01). Mortality risk increased with every subsequent shock, up to an HR of 3.7 after 5 inappropriate shocks.
CONCLUSIONS: In a large cohort of ICD patients, inappropriate shocks were common. The most important finding is the association between inappropriate shocks and mortality, independent of interim appropriate shocks. Copyright Â
© 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21272746     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.06.059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  95 in total

1.  [Annual report 2013 of the German Cardiac Pacemaker And Defibrillator Register--Part 2: implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Pacemaker and AQUA Institute for Applied Quality Improvement and Research in Health Care GmbH workgroup].

Authors:  A Markewitz
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2015-12

2.  Use and Abuse of Internal Cardioverter Defibrillators for Primary Prevention.

Authors:  Joshua R Silverstein; Demosthenes G Katritsis; Mark E Josephson
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2012-09

3.  [Annual Report 2011 of the German pacemaker and defibrillator register: Section pacemakers and AQUA-Institute for Applied Quality Improvement and Research in Health Care].

Authors:  A Markewitz
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2013-12

Review 4.  [What must intensive care physicians know about implantable cardioverter defibrillator?].

Authors:  E Gatterer
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 0.840

5.  Reduction of inappropriate ICD therapies in patients with primary prevention of sudden cardiac death: DECREASE study.

Authors:  Jörg Otto Schwab; Hendrik Bonnemeier; Thomas Kleemann; Johannes Brachmann; Sven Fischer; Frank Birkenhauer; Frank Eberhardt
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 6.  Korean Guidelines for Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Heart Failure.

Authors:  Min-Seok Kim; Ju-Hee Lee; Eung Ju Kim; Dae-Gyun Park; Sung-Ji Park; Jin Joo Park; Mi-Seung Shin; Byung Su Yoo; Jong-Chan Youn; Sang Eun Lee; Sang Hyun Ihm; Se Yong Jang; Sang-Ho Jo; Jae Yeong Cho; Hyun-Jai Cho; Seonghoon Choi; Jin-Oh Choi; Seong Woo Han; Kyung Kuk Hwang; Eun Seok Jeon; Myeong-Chan Cho; Shung Chull Chae; Dong-Ju Choi
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 3.243

Review 7.  Electrical Storm: Current Evidence, Clinical Implications, and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Christos Kontogiannis; Konstantinos Tampakis; Georgios Georgiopoulos; Stefano Bartoletti; Christos Papageorgiou; Hector Anninos; Alkistis Kapelouzou; Michael Spartalis; Ioannis Paraskevaidis; Sofia Chatzidou
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-07-27       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 8.  Electromagnetic interference between implantable cardiac devices and continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: a review.

Authors:  Jonathan S Gordon; Elizabeth J Maynes; Thomas J O'Malley; Behzad B Pavri; Vakhtang Tchantchaleishvili
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 9.  ICD programming to reduce shocks and improve outcomes.

Authors:  Valentina Kutyifa; Wojciech Zareba; Arthur J Moss
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.931

10.  Determinants of inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks: the German Device Registry perspective.

Authors:  Erdal Safak; Lars Eckardt; Werner Jung; Hüseyin Ince; Jochen Senges; Matthias Hochadel; Christian Perings; Stefan Spitzer; Johannes Brachmann; Karlheinz Seidl; Hans Ulrich Hink; Giuseppe D'Ancona
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 1.900

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.