| Literature DB >> 21272319 |
Heather Ann Brauer1, Tanya E Libby, Breeana L Mitchell, Lin Li, Chu Chen, Timothy W Randolph, Yutaka Y Yasui, Johanna W Lampe, Paul D Lampe.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cruciferous vegetable intake is inversely associated with the risk of several cancers. Isothiocyanates (ITC) are hypothesized to be the major bioactive constituents contributing to these cancer-preventive effects. The polymorphic glutathione-S-transferase (GST) gene family encodes several enzymes which catalyze ITC degradation in vivo.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21272319 PMCID: PMC3042379 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2891-10-11
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutr J ISSN: 1475-2891 Impact factor: 3.271
Gender and genotype distribution of participants for EAT and 2EAT1
| Men | Women | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 9 | 4 | 13 | |
| 10 | 15 | 10 | 7 | |
1GSTM1 genotypes (i.e., GSTM1+ or GSTM1- null) by gender are presented for both dietary studies; all participants were used for analysis.
Figure 1Processed MALDI-TOF MS spectra. (A) The 2500-10000 m/z range of the log mean spectrum from each study (all spectra from EAT in red, 2EAT in black) showing the consistency of the data between the two studies and the peak at 7600; (B) A close-up of 2EAT mean spectrum (in black) with peak-location density histograms from all spectra in each study (EAT in gray, 2EAT in blue) shows there are approximately 30 peaks in the 9300-10000 range and the ZAG fragment at 9560 m/z appears consistently on the shoulder of the peak at 9520 m/z.
Selection of significant peaks affected by diet and/or GSTM1 genotype1
| Peak ( | EAT | 2EAT | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALL | ALL | ALL | ||||||||
| 4813 | 0.043 | 0.370 | 0.005 | 0.188 | 0.254 | 0.140 | 0.062 | 0.478 | 0.062 | |
| 0.047* | 0.619 | 0.031* | 0.168 | 0.427 | 0.240 | 0.022* | 0.664 | 0.005* | ||
| 4905 | 1.509 | 1.214 | 1.877 | 1.183 | 0.920 | 1.521 | 1.789 | 1.436 | 1.789 | |
| 0.020* | 0.384 | 0.022* | 0.520 | 0.823 | 0.248 | 0.028* | 0.326 | 0.033* | ||
| 6500 | 0.870 | 0.975 | 0.776 | 0.823 | 0.959 | 0.708 | 0.527 | 0.629 | 0.527 | |
| 0.319 | 0.887 | 0.242 | 0.502 | 0.919 | 0.391 | 0.028* | 0.248 | 0.048* | ||
| 6700 | 0.782 | 0.933 | 0.655 | 0.712 | 0.878 | 0.577 | 0.574 | 0.876 | 0.575 | |
| 0.123 | 0.732 | 0.087 | 0.276 | 0.767 | 0.207 | 0.076 | 0.760 | 0.029* | ||
| 9565 | 0.744 | 1.229 | 0.451 | 0.745 | 0.966 | 0.575 | 0.569 | 0.629 | 0.569 | |
| 0.044* | 0.267 | 0.001* | 0.064 | 0.879 | 0.012* | 0.000* | 0.038* | 0.004* | ||
| 9812 | 1.218 | 1.131 | 1.312 | 1.167 | 0.870 | 1.565 | 1.494 | 1.458 | 1.494 | |
| 0.036* | 0.297 | 0.062 | 0.323 | 0.529 | 0.041* | 0.011* | 0.083 | 0.058* | ||
11X cruciferous diet (basal diet supplemented with 436 g/day cruciferous vegetables) compared to EAT basal diet (fruit- and vegetable-free).
21X cruciferous diet (basal diet supplemented with 7 g/kg body weight/day cruciferous vegetables) compared to 2EAT basal diet.
32X cruciferous diet (basal diet supplemented with 14 g/kg body weight/day cruciferous vegetables) compared to 2EAT basal diet.
4IR denotes the cruciferous vegetable-to-basal diet peak intensity ratio in the unit of square root of estimand of between-subject variance.
* P < 0.05
Figure 2Box plots comparing peak intensities (normalized to the peak with the highest intensity) of 6700 (A) cruciferous vegetable response among GSTM1-null individuals in EAT. (B) cruciferous vegetable response among GSTM1+ individuals in EAT. (C) cruciferous vegetable response among GSTM1-null individuals in 2EAT. (D) Cruciferous vegetable response among GSTM1+ individuals in 2EAT.
Figure 3Box plots comparing peak intensities (normalized to the peak with the highest intensity) of 9565 (A) cruciferous vegetable response among GSTM1-null individuals in EAT. (B) cruciferous vegetable response among GSTM1+ individuals in EAT. (C) cruciferous vegetable response among GSTM1-null individuals in 2EAT. (D) Cruciferous vegetable response among GSTM1+ individuals in 2EAT.
Figure 4Diet-genotype regulation of mean TTR level differences via dot blot. Levels of TTR are calculated as a ratio of cruciferous diet over basal diet for each individual. The values shown are mean ratio ± SD. Samples analyzed include: EAT N = 36 (14 GSTM1+ and 22 GSTM1-null) and 2EAT N = 42 (20 GSTM1+ and 22 GSTM1-null).
Figure 5Diet-genotype regulation of mean TTR level differences via dot blot. Diet-genotype regulation of mean ZAG level differences via dot blot. Levels of ZAG are calculated as a ratio of cruciferous diet over basal diet for each individual. The values shown are mean ratio ± SD. Samples analyzed include: EAT N = 36 (14 GSTM1+ and 22 GSTM1-null) and 2EAT N = 42 (20 GSTM1+ and 22 GSTM1-null).