PURPOSE: To develop a modular MR-compatible lower leg exercise device for muscle testing using a clinical 3 T MR scanner. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An exercise device to provide isotonic resistance to plantar- or dorsiflexion was constructed from nonferrous materials and designed for easy setup and use in a clinical environment. Validation tests were performed during dynamic MR acquisitions. For this purpose, the device was tested on the posterior lower leg musculature of five subjects during 3 min of exercise at 30% of maximum voluntary plantarflexion during 31-phosphorus MR spectroscopy ((31)P-MRS). Measures of muscle phosphocreatine (PCr), inorganic phosphate (Pi), and pH were obtained before, during, and after the exercise protocol. RESULTS: At the end of exercise regimen, muscle PCr showed a 28% decrease from resting levels (to 21.8 ± 3.9 from 30.4 ± 3.0 mM) and the average PCr recovery rate was 35.3 ± 8.3 s. Muscle Pi concentrations increased 123% (to 14.6 ± 4.7 from 6.5 ± 3.3 mM) and pH decreased 1.5% (to 7.06 ± 0.14 from 7.17 ± 0.07) from resting levels. CONCLUSION: The described MR-compatible lower leg exercise was an effective tool for data acquisition during dynamic MR acquisitions of the calf muscles. The modular design allows for adaptation to other whole-body MR scanners and incorporation of custom-built mechanical or electronic interfaces and can be used for any MR protocol requiring dynamic evaluation of calf muscles.
PURPOSE: To develop a modular MR-compatible lower leg exercise device for muscle testing using a clinical 3 T MR scanner. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An exercise device to provide isotonic resistance to plantar- or dorsiflexion was constructed from nonferrous materials and designed for easy setup and use in a clinical environment. Validation tests were performed during dynamic MR acquisitions. For this purpose, the device was tested on the posterior lower leg musculature of five subjects during 3 min of exercise at 30% of maximum voluntary plantarflexion during 31-phosphorus MR spectroscopy ((31)P-MRS). Measures of muscle phosphocreatine (PCr), inorganic phosphate (Pi), and pH were obtained before, during, and after the exercise protocol. RESULTS: At the end of exercise regimen, muscle PCr showed a 28% decrease from resting levels (to 21.8 ± 3.9 from 30.4 ± 3.0 mM) and the average PCr recovery rate was 35.3 ± 8.3 s. Muscle Pi concentrations increased 123% (to 14.6 ± 4.7 from 6.5 ± 3.3 mM) and pH decreased 1.5% (to 7.06 ± 0.14 from 7.17 ± 0.07) from resting levels. CONCLUSION: The described MR-compatible lower leg exercise was an effective tool for data acquisition during dynamic MR acquisitions of the calf muscles. The modular design allows for adaptation to other whole-body MR scanners and incorporation of custom-built mechanical or electronic interfaces and can be used for any MR protocol requiring dynamic evaluation of calf muscles.
Authors: V B Schrauwen-Hinderling; M E Kooi; M K C Hesselink; J A L Jeneson; W H Backes; C J A van Echteld; J M A van Engelshoven; M Mensink; P Schrauwen Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2006-11-09 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: David C Isbell; Frederick H Epstein; Xiaodong Zhong; Joseph M DiMaria; Stuart S Berr; Craig H Meyer; Walter J Rogers; Nancy L Harthun; Klaus D Hagspiel; Arthur Weltman; Christopher M Kramer Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Hideo Makimura; Takara L Stanley; Caroline Suresh; Ana Luisa De Sousa-Coelho; Walter R Frontera; Stephanie Syu; Laurie R Braun; Sara E Looby; Meghan N Feldpausch; Martin Torriani; Hang Lee; Mary-Elizabeth Patti; Steven K Grinspoon Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2015-12-21 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Miriam A Bredella; Anu V Gerweck; Eleanor Lin; Melissa G Landa; Martin Torriani; David A Schoenfeld; Linda C Hemphill; Karen K Miller Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2013-07-03 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Sulaiman R Hamarneh; Caitlin A Murphy; Cynthia W Shih; Walter Frontera; Martin Torriani; Javier E Irazoqui; Hideo Makimura Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2014-11-06 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Petr Sedivy; Monika Dezortova; Jan Rydlo; Miloslav Drobny; Martin Krssak; Ladislav Valkovic; Milan Hajek Journal: J Appl Biomed Date: 2019-04-15 Impact factor: 1.797
Authors: Suman Srinivasa; Caroline Suresh; Jay Mottla; Sulaiman R Hamarneh; Javier E Irazoqui; Walter Frontera; Martin Torriani; Takara Stanley; Hideo Makimura Journal: Growth Horm IGF Res Date: 2015-12-17 Impact factor: 2.372
Authors: Matthew D Muller; Zhijun Li; Christopher T Sica; J Carter Luck; Zhaohui Gao; Cheryl A Blaha; Aimee E Cauffman; Amanda J Ross; Nathan J R Winkler; Michael D Herr; Kristen Brandt; Jianli Wang; David C Gallagher; Prasanna Karunanayaka; Jeffrey Vesek; Urs A Leuenberger; Qing X Yang; Lawrence I Sinoway Journal: Physiol Rep Date: 2016-10-24
Authors: Alison Sleigh; Victoria Lupson; Ajay Thankamony; David B Dunger; David B Savage; T Adrian Carpenter; Graham J Kemp Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-01-11 Impact factor: 4.379