Literature DB >> 21270851

Of course scientists can communicate.

Tim Radford1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2011        PMID： 21270851     DOI： 10.1038/469445a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN： 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  Science Communication to the General Public: Why We Need to Teach Undergraduate and Graduate Students this Skill as Part of Their Formal Scientific Training.

Authors:  Sara E Brownell; Jordan V Price; Lawrence Steinman
Journal:  J Undergrad Neurosci Educ       Date:  2013-10-15

2.  Communicating chemistry for public engagement.

Authors:  Matthew R Hartings; Declan Fahy
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 24.427

3.  On being a (modern) scientist: risks of public engagement in the UK interspecies embryo debate.

Authors:  James Porter; Clare Williams; Steven Wainwright; Alan Cribb
Journal:  New Genet Soc       Date:  2012-05-22

4.  Beyond Journals-Visual Abstracts Promote Wider Suicide Prevention Research Dissemination and Engagement: A Randomized Crossover Trial.

Authors:  Adam S Hoffberg; Joe Huggins; Audrey Cobb; Jeri E Forster; Nazanin Bahraini
Journal:  Front Res Metr Anal       Date:  2020-10-14

5.  How to Put It Plainly? Findings From Two Randomized Controlled Studies on Writing Plain Language Summaries for Psychological Meta-Analyses.

Authors:  Martin Kerwer; Marlene Stoll; Mark Jonas; Gesa Benz; Anita Chasiotis
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-12-16
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.