Literature DB >> 21268669

The continuity illusion does not depend on attentional state: FMRI evidence from illusory vowels.

Antje Heinrich1, Robert P Carlyon, Matthew H Davis, Ingrid S Johnsrude.   

Abstract

We investigate whether the neural correlates of the continuity illusion, as measured using fMRI, are modulated by attention. As we have shown previously, when two formants of a synthetic vowel are presented in an alternating pattern, the vowel can be identified if the gaps in each formant are filled with bursts of plausible masking noise, causing the illusory percept of a continuous vowel ("Illusion" condition). When the formant-to-noise ratio is increased so that noise no longer plausibly masks the formants, the formants are heard as interrupted ("Illusion Break" condition) and vowels are not identifiable. A region of the left middle temporal gyrus (MTG) is sensitive both to intact synthetic vowels (two formants present simultaneously) and to Illusion stimuli, compared to Illusion Break stimuli. Here, we compared these conditions in the presence and absence of attention. We examined fMRI signal for different sound types under three attentional conditions: full attention to the vowels; attention to a visual distracter; or attention to an auditory distracter. Crucially, although a robust main effect of attentional state was observed in many regions, the effect of attention did not differ systematically for the illusory vowels compared to either intact vowels or to the Illusion Break stimuli in the left STG/MTG vowel-sensitive region. This result suggests that illusory continuity of vowels is an obligatory perceptual process, and operates independently of attentional state. An additional finding was that the sensitivity of primary auditory cortex to the number of sound onsets in the stimulus was modulated by attention.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21268669     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2011.21627

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  12 in total

1.  Female túngara frogs do not experience the continuity illusion.

Authors:  Alexander T Baugh; Michael J Ryan; Ximena E Bernal; A Stanley Rand; Mark A Bee
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 1.912

2.  Getting the Cocktail Party Started: Masking Effects in Speech Perception.

Authors:  Samuel Evans; Carolyn McGettigan; Zarinah K Agnew; Stuart Rosen; Sophie K Scott
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Neural restoration of degraded audiovisual speech.

Authors:  Antoine J Shahin; Jess R Kerlin; Jyoti Bhat; Lee M Miller
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-12-10       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Hearing an illusory vowel in noise: suppression of auditory cortical activity.

Authors:  Lars Riecke; Mieke Vanbussel; Lars Hausfeld; Deniz Başkent; Elia Formisano; Fabrizio Esposito
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Perceptual asymmetry induced by the auditory continuity illusion.

Authors:  Dorea R Ruggles; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Tolerance for audiovisual asynchrony is enhanced by the spectrotemporal fidelity of the speaker's mouth movements and speech.

Authors:  Antoine J Shahin; Stanley Shen; Jess R Kerlin
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 2.331

7.  Individual differences in sound-in-noise perception are related to the strength of short-latency neural responses to noise.

Authors:  Ekaterina Vinnik; Pavel M Itskov; Evan Balaban
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Effortful listening: the processing of degraded speech depends critically on attention.

Authors:  Conor J Wild; Afiqah Yusuf; Daryl E Wilson; Jonathan E Peelle; Matthew H Davis; Ingrid S Johnsrude
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Effect of flanking sounds on the auditory continuity illusion.

Authors:  Maori Kobayashi; Makio Kashino
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Visual context due to speech-reading suppresses the auditory response to acoustic interruptions in speech.

Authors:  Jyoti Bhat; Mark A Pitt; Antoine J Shahin
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.