Literature DB >> 21265447

Spatiotemporal exploratory models for broad-scale survey data.

Daniel Fink1, Wesley M Hochachka, Benjamin Zuckerberg, David W Winkler, Ben Shaby, M Arthur Munson, Giles Hooker, Mirek Riedewald, Daniel Sheldon, Steve Kelling.   

Abstract

The distributions of animal populations change and evolve through time. Migratory species exploit different habitats at different times of the year. Biotic and abiotic features that determine where a species lives vary due to natural and anthropogenic factors. This spatiotemporal variation needs to be accounted for in any modeling of species' distributions. In this paper we introduce a semiparametric model that provides a flexible framework for analyzing dynamic patterns of species occurrence and abundance from broad-scale survey data. The spatiotemporal exploratory model (STEM) adds essential spatiotemporal structure to existing techniques for developing species distribution models through a simple parametric structure without requiring a detailed understanding of the underlying dynamic processes. STEMs use a multi-scale strategy to differentiate between local and global-scale spatiotemporal structure. A user-specified species distribution model accounts for spatial and temporal patterning at the local level. These local patterns are then allowed to "scale up" via ensemble averaging to larger scales. This makes STEMs especially well suited for exploring distributional dynamics arising from a variety of processes. Using data from eBird, an online citizen science bird-monitoring project, we demonstrate that monthly changes in distribution of a migratory species, the Tree Swallow (Tachycineta bicolor), can be more accurately described with a STEM than a conventional bagged decision tree model in which spatiotemporal structure has not been imposed. We also demonstrate that there is no loss of model predictive power when a STEM is used to describe a spatiotemporal distribution with very little spatiotemporal variation; the distribution of a nonmigratory species, the Northern Cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21265447     DOI: 10.1890/09-1340.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  34 in total

1.  Migratory strategy drives species-level variation in bird sensitivity to vegetation green-up.

Authors:  Casey Youngflesh; Jacob Socolar; Bruna R Amaral; Ali Arab; Robert P Guralnick; Allen H Hurlbert; Raphael LaFrance; Stephen J Mayor; David A W Miller; Morgan W Tingley
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 15.460

2.  Changes in aquatic vegetation and floodplain land cover in the Upper Mississippi and Illinois rivers (1989-2000-2010).

Authors:  Nathan R De Jager; Jason J Rohweder
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Spring phenology of ecological productivity contributes to the use of looped migration strategies by birds.

Authors:  Frank A La Sorte; Daniel Fink; Wesley M Hochachka; John P DeLong; Steve Kelling
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Citizen science: best practices to remove observer bias in trend analysis.

Authors:  Alemu Gonsamo; Petra D'Odorico
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 3.787

5.  A Linked Science Investigation: Enhancing Climate Change Data Discovery with Semantic Technologies.

Authors:  Line C Pouchard; Marcia L Branstetter; Robert B Cook; Ranjeet Devarakonda; Jim Green; Giri Palanisamy; Paul Alexander; Natalya F Noy
Journal:  Earth Sci Inform       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.878

6.  Comparing N-mixture models and GLMMs for relative abundance estimation in a citizen science dataset.

Authors:  Benjamin R Goldstein; Perry de Valpine
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Spatiotemporal variation in avian migration phenology: citizen science reveals effects of climate change.

Authors:  Allen H Hurlbert; Zhongfei Liang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  eBird: engaging birders in science and conservation.

Authors:  Chris Wood; Brian Sullivan; Marshall Iliff; Daniel Fink; Steve Kelling
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  Both real-time and long-term environmental data perform well in predicting shorebird distributions in managed habitat.

Authors:  Erin E Conlisk; Gregory H Golet; Mark D Reynolds; Blake A Barbaree; Kristin A Sesser; Kristin B Byrd; Sam Veloz; Matthew E Reiter
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2022-04-24       Impact factor: 6.105

10.  Modeling the distribution of migratory bird stopovers to inform landscape-scale siting of wind development.

Authors:  Amy Pocewicz; Wendy A Estes-Zumpf; Mark D Andersen; Holly E Copeland; Douglas A Keinath; Hannah R Griscom
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.