CONTEXT: Repeated patient education about skin cancer prevention is important to self-care after transplant. OBJECTIVE: Examine educational materials for kidney transplant recipients available on the Internet that address sun protection and skin self-examination for early detection of squamous cell carcinoma. DESIGN: Systematic review of Web sites for kidney transplant recipients endorsed by transplant physicians and dermatologists. PARTICIPANTS: An expert panel of 8 dermatologists providing care for kidney transplant recipients and 1 research medical anthropologist. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Reading grade level, inclusion of people with skin of color, sufficient content to support effective sun protection, and description of 4 sun-protection strategies and skin self-examination. Results-Of the 40 sites identified, 11 contained information about sun protection or increased risk of any type of cancer. The Web sites had a ninth-grade median reading level (range, seventh grade to college senior). Interrater reliability for the 25-item assessment tool was assessed by Fleiss' kappa (kappa = 0.87). Skin cancer risk was presented as relevant to those with fair skin. Sites recommended regular use of sunscreen with sun-protection factor of 15 or greater (n=3) to reduce the risk of skin cancer (n=4). Few sites recommended using protective clothing (n=5), seeking shade (n=4), and avoiding deliberate tanning with indoor or outdoor light (n=1). Five sites recommended skin self-examination. CONCLUSION: Because many patients seek self-management information from the Internet, Web sites must provide more thorough educational information about skin cancer prevention and health promotion at a lower reading grade level.
CONTEXT: Repeated patient education about skin cancer prevention is important to self-care after transplant. OBJECTIVE: Examine educational materials for kidney transplant recipients available on the Internet that address sun protection and skin self-examination for early detection of squamous cell carcinoma. DESIGN: Systematic review of Web sites for kidney transplant recipients endorsed by transplant physicians and dermatologists. PARTICIPANTS: An expert panel of 8 dermatologists providing care for kidney transplant recipients and 1 research medical anthropologist. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Reading grade level, inclusion of people with skin of color, sufficient content to support effective sun protection, and description of 4 sun-protection strategies and skin self-examination. Results-Of the 40 sites identified, 11 contained information about sun protection or increased risk of any type of cancer. The Web sites had a ninth-grade median reading level (range, seventh grade to college senior). Interrater reliability for the 25-item assessment tool was assessed by Fleiss' kappa (kappa = 0.87). Skin cancer risk was presented as relevant to those with fair skin. Sites recommended regular use of sunscreen with sun-protection factor of 15 or greater (n=3) to reduce the risk of skin cancer (n=4). Few sites recommended using protective clothing (n=5), seeking shade (n=4), and avoiding deliberate tanning with indoor or outdoor light (n=1). Five sites recommended skin self-examination. CONCLUSION: Because many patients seek self-management information from the Internet, Web sites must provide more thorough educational information about skin cancer prevention and health promotion at a lower reading grade level.
Authors: Daniela P Ladner; Estella M Alonso; Zeeshan Butt; Juan Carlos Caicedo; David Cella; Amna Daud; John J Friedewald; Elisa J Gordon; Gordon B Hazen; Bing T Ho; Kathleen R Hoke; Jane L Holl; Michael G Ison; Raymond Kang; Sanjay Mehrotra; Luke B Preczewski; Olivia A Ross; Pamela H Sharaf; Anton I Skaro; Edward Wang; Michael S Wolf; Donna M Woods; Michael M Abecassis Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Casey L Daniel; Gregory T Armstrong; Robyn R Keske; Jessica A Davine; Aaron J McDonald; Kim M Sprunck-Harrild; Catherine Coleman; Sebastien J Haneuse; Ann C Mertens; Karen M Emmons; Ashfaq A Marghoob; Elena B Elkin; Stephen W Dusza; Leslie L Robison; Alan C Geller Journal: Trials Date: 2015-03-24 Impact factor: 2.279