Literature DB >> 21264755

Gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma of young patients who underwent curative surgery: a comparative analysis with older group.

Ho Young Yoon1, Choong Bai Kim.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Adenocarcinoma of the stomach at a young age has a poor prognosis, but there are few reports describing gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. This study aimed to compare the clinicopathological characteristics between the young and old patients who underwent curative surgery.
METHODS: One thousand three hundred and sixty-one patients with gastric adenocarcinoma underwent a curative gastrectomy between January 1, 1992 and December 31, 2006. Of these, 141 (10.4%) cases were gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma according to the Siewert's classification, and the data were collected prospectively for the analysis of the young age group (under 44 years old), in comparison to the older age group, with factors such as pathological characteristics, recurrence, and survival.
RESULTS: The sex ratio was near 1:1 in the younger group while it was predominantly male in the older group. There were no significant differences in the clinicopathological characteristics, such as the recurrence and survival rate, between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The factor of young age does not critically affect the clinical course of gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. This may be attributed to curative surgery and multimodality therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21264755     DOI: 10.1007/s00595-009-4228-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  13 in total

1.  Gastric carcinoma in young adults.

Authors:  H Katai; M Sasako; T Sano; K Maruyama
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Gastric carcinoma in young adults.

Authors:  P J Matley; D M Dent; M V Madden; S K Price
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Oestrogen receptor D5 antibody is an independent negative prognostic factor in gastric cancer.

Authors:  J D Harrison; J A Jones; I O Ellis; D L Morris
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Gastric cancer in the young.

Authors:  I R Lai; W J Lee; C N Chen; P H Lee; K J Chang; S Chang-Yu; K M Chen
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec

5.  Gastric adenocarcinoma in patients 40 years of age or younger.

Authors:  C P Theuer; C de Virgilio; G Keese; S French; T Arnell; J Tolmos; S Klein; W Powers; T Oh; B E Stabile
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Clinicopathologic study of advanced gastric cancer without serosal invasion in young and old patients.

Authors:  J Y Wang; J S Hsieh; C J Huang; Y S Huang; T J Huang
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.454

7.  Gastric carcinoma in the young.

Authors:  P L Tso; W L Bringaze; A H Dauterive; P Correa; I Cohn
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1987-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Menstrual and reproductive factors and gastric-cancer risk in women.

Authors:  C La Vecchia; B D'Avanzo; S Franceschi; E Negri; F Parazzini; A Decarli
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1994-12-15       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  Relationship between age and clinical characteristics of patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  S S Lo; C W Wu; M C Hsieh; H S Kuo; W Y Lui; F K P'Eng
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.029

10.  Comparative study of gastric cancer in young and aged patients.

Authors:  T Okamoto; M Makino; H Kawasumi; O Kimura; H Nishidoi; N Kaibara; S Koga
Journal:  Eur Surg Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.745

View more
  5 in total

1.  Influence of young age on outcome after esophagectomy for cancer.

Authors:  Anna M J van Nistelrooij; Elrozy R Andrinopoulou; Jan J B van Lanschot; Hugo W Tilanus; Bas P L Wijnhoven
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Lymph node metastasis in gastric cardiac adenocarcinoma in male patients.

Authors:  Gang Ren; Ying-Wei Chen; Rong Cai; Wen-Jie Zhang; Xiang-Ru Wu; Ye-Ning Jin
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Higher clinical suspicion is needed for prompt diagnosis of esophageal adenocarcinoma in young patients.

Authors:  Tamar B Nobel; Michael Curry; Renee Gennarelli; David R Jones; Daniela Molena
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 4.  Primary esophageal adenocarcinoma arising from heterotopic gastric mucosa: report of a case.

Authors:  Naoki Akanuma; Isamu Hoshino; Yasunori Akutsu; Kiyohiko Shuto; Toru Shiratori; Tsuguaki Kono; Masaya Uesato; Asami Sato; Yuka Isozaki; Tetsuro Maruyama; Nobuyoshi Takeshita; Hisahiro Matsubara
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-06-17       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Predictors of Lymph Node Metastasis in Siewert Type II T1 Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction: A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Liubo Chen; Kejun Tang; Sihan Wang; Dongdong Chen; Kefeng Ding
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.302

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.